ipl-logo

Incompatibilism Vs Libertarianism

1006 Words5 Pages

Andrew LaCombe
12/15/16
Mind and Reality 11:00am-12:15pm
Catherine Sutton

Short paper

The purpose of this paper is to explore an objection to the libertarian view on the topic of free will, as well as proposing the libertarian rebuttal to said objections. When discussing free will it is important to understand the various differing views as some are rather similar. To start off, Libertarianism is grounded in the incompatibilist position, which argues that determinism is false due to it’s logical incompatibility with the thought that agents have free will. Free will can be defined as the idiosyncratic ability of an individual to exercise control over oneself in a manner necessary for moral responsibility. A person is considered a morally …show more content…

Semi-compatibilism is a view proposed by John Martin Fischer which only differs from compatibilism in the area of regulative control and moral responsibility. Fischer states that regulative control stems from the view of moral responsibility and is summarized as an agent who has alternative actions available to them. Agents can have guidance control even when they have no alternate possibilities available, and that moral responsibility is a product of the actual events in the causal sequence. The difference in semi-compatibilism from compatibilism is shown through the throwing out of regulative control in order to replace it with guidance control. Semi-compatibilism allows us to confidently attribute moral responsibility even if we are unsure about determinism. This sets Fischer aside from most philosophers of his time because they were all very interested in how free will and determinism are related (compatible) while Fischer glosses over the aspect of free will and states that moral responsibility and determinism are compatible regardless. Guidance control is comprised of two elements, the first being that one has to be a morally responsible agent whose actions must be the agents own, and secondly the crucial capacities used by a morally responsible agent are capacities for recognizing and responding to reasons for …show more content…

The consequence argument revolves around power necessity, which concerns facts that an individual does not have power over. Mathematics is a common example because no person has power over the truths of mathematics (i.e., no person can act in such a way that the truths of mathematics would be false). The argument itself requires that determinism is true and that facts of the past are fixed as well as the laws of nature. The argument goes roughly as such: 1) No person can have power over past facts or the laws of

Show More
Related
760 Words | 4 Pages

The case of Robert Alton Harris, a convicted murderer who was executed in 1992 for his crimes, raises profound questions about free will and moral responsibility. In this essay, I will argue that Harris did not exercise free agency when committing the crimes, that he could not have done otherwise, and that he is morally responsible for his actions despite his background. Moreover, I will show how this scenario can be used to shed light on the possibility of free will and moral responsibility in a deterministic universe. First, let us consider the facts of the case.

Read More
1508 Words | 7 Pages

In the paper “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility”, Susan Wolf discusses her ideas on what is necessary for an individual to be responsible for their actions. She argues that in order for the person to be held morally responsible for their actions, they need to be morally sane. To consider one to be morally sane, this individual must have an ideology that is able for them to distinguish right from wrong. Hence, a morally sane person must be able to reason and have a sound mind. Furthermore, Wolf establishes the sane deep-self view by applying other philosopher’s ideas.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

Lucy Bichakhchyan Introduction to Philosophy Second Short Written Assignment GALEN STRAWSON THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF MORAL RESPONSIBILITY Galen Strawson is a British philosopher, who is famous for his philosophical works on free will, panpsychism, causality, determinism etc. This paper is about his article “The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility”. The title of the article already gives away the stand that Strawson has considering Moral Responsibility..

Read More
1573 Words | 7 Pages

John Galt is the moral safeguard of society, the last vestige of rationality in a world of hopelessness and apathy. The use of John Galt’s identity as a rhetorical question demonstrates how rare rationality is in a world full of ‘looters’, Free will, too, is a direct result of rational thought. “That which you call your soul or spirit is your consciousness, and that which you call ‘free will’ is your mind’s freedom to think or not, the only will you have, your only freedom, the choice that controls all the choices you make and determines your life and your character.” If this is true, then free will is truly the safeguard of

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

This connects to Rand’s idea of freedom because in the beginning, one thinking for themself is unacceptable, while in the end, one living for their own sake is true

Read More
1445 Words | 6 Pages

In "Human Freedom and the Self", Roderick Chisholm has taken a libertarian approach on the issue of free will and determinism. Libertarians believe that humans have free will and make a distinction that free will and determinism are incompatible. Chisholm has the same opinion. On the problem of human freedom, Chisholm thinks that “Human beings are responsible agents; but this fact appears to conflict with a deterministic view of human action (the view that every event that is involved in an act is caused by some other event); and it also appears to conflict with an indeterministic view of human action (the view that the act, or some event that is essential to the act, is not caused at all).”(Page 3). He does not agree that determinism or indeterminism

Read More
1270 Words | 6 Pages

“The only person you are destined to become is the person you decide to be.” — Ralph Waldo Emerson. The decisions humans make determine who they are: the past is not a factor that determines who they become. Humans continually deceive themselves when trying to avoid taking responsibility for their actions and the idea that humans are liable for their own actions is the school of thought called Libertarianism. Past experiences do not influence future decisions because the future is not fixed.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

A philosopher named John Locke believed that people should be free to do what they want, but if their choices are poor, then they should be ready to face the consequences. In his justification, he asserts that “We must consider what state men are naturally in... a state of perfect freedom to order their actions and dispose

Read More
165 Words | 1 Pages

The three positions on free Will that van Inwagen discusses in his paper all lead him to feel they include a mystery. Determinists say we have absolutely NO free Will ever, but van Inwagen says if there is no such thing as free Will than no human can be responsible for their actions. Compatibilists say we do have some free Will but it is determined by prior events in our life, events we can analyze and say “well if A is true , B must also be true” . But van Inwagen says how can we claim to have free Will when we know from our past there is a connection between A & B. The Libertarian believes our Will is free when a choice can be made that is not determined or necessitated by prior events.

Read More
189 Words | 1 Pages

Out of all the characters from Outsiders the one that appealed to me the most was two-bit because of how silly he is throughout the story. Two-bit was always the one to cheer people up when they were down and he could also get tough when he needed to be tough. Compared to two-bit my least favorite character is dally cause of how violent he is throughout the story he was always either tormenting or threatening someone and that just never appealed to me. In outsiders I have always felt like i related to Ponyboy the most cause of his love for books and sports.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

How do I Make Moral choices, in a World of Moral Ambiguity? A desire for meaning would also include obtaining some kind of “identity,” or individualism. Yet, society or someone will try to force their “ideal” moral system onto everyone else. “Thinking may be “good for nothing” in the world, but in the mind it is good for guidance—not legislation, but guidance” (Bruehl 193).

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

The main philosophy of John Locke, a famous and well-known Enlightenment philosopher, involves his theory of natural law and natural rights given to mankind. In this particular article, entitled “The Consent of the Governed”, part of his work Two Treatises of Government, Locke addresses importance of man’s natural state and its main characteristics, the forming of a government and what it offers and the relationship between a government and its subjects. According to Locke, man’s natural state is a state of equality, with no man being of higher power than another and all are welcome to have complete control over their own lives. He states that, by nature, men are “all free, equal, and independent, no one can be put out of this estate,

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

“I believe the freedom to choose my course in life but I do not believe I am free to choose the consequences of my

Read More
1777 Words | 8 Pages

Taylor’s philosophy and view on determinism, free will and moral responsibility reflects the libertarian philosophic position. He attaches large importance to free will and free choice of a person. Taylor asserts that “certain events (namely, human choices) are not completely determined by preceding events; rather, they are caused by the agent of the choice (the person doing the choosing)” (Free Will). This view differs from that of Blatchford, Schlick and Hospers who deny free choice concluding that everything is determined in our decisions and actions.

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

Prompt 2 Question 1 Compatibilists believe that free will is compatible with determinism and an act can be both free and determined at the same time. They identify free will with freedom of action and to act freely simply means to be free from external coercion. Determinism is the idea that every event including human decisions and actions are completely predetermined by previous causes. Once the causes occur, the effects must follow. These effects include moral choices.

Read More

More about Incompatibilism Vs Libertarianism

Related Topics

Open Document