ipl-logo

Inductive Arguments Of Statistical And Casual Generalization

652 Words3 Pages

The first concept I learned in when it comes to inductive arguments statistical and causal generalizations is that induction the process of drawing generalizations from unknown facts or research to give strength and support to conclusions. Stated in coded form, we offer proof that most A’s and B’s. Therefore, if I encounter an A, it is probably a B. However, I realize that there are expectations (Diestler 2012). When it comes to induction it begins with some data and then it determines what the general conclusion can come from a logical be resulting from the data. Basically, it can be determined by the theory or theories, which can be explained from the data. For example, Kimberly leaves for school at 8:00 am. Kimberly is always on time. …show more content…

Also when it comes to statistical generalizations refers to data collected by polling and research studies. Pollsters and researchers use systemic methods to get results with great predictive value that is they can tell us what probably will happen in a given situation. Statistical generalization is inferences drawn from statistical evidence that are used to give strength to inductive arguments (Diestler 2012). When it comes to an inductive argument one premise of which a statistical generalization about a group. So therefore this information about the group, the arguer can obtain a conclusion about the specific member of that group. When it comes to generalizations that are the most common form of reasoning. I think statistical generalizations contain challenges to classify overall arrangements, what is representative of a normal or communicate broad-spectrum of rules. Basically statistical generalization is a very important concept without it so much knowledge would be yielded as broken and fragmented. Lastly, statistical generalization is a risk without there would be deceptive stereotypes being

Show More
Related

Analysis Of Why We Should Keep The Confederate Monuments Right Where They Are By John Daniel Davidson

520 Words | 3 Pages

In the text, there are many instances where statistical evidence is used to help back Davidson’s point. Using this method of evidence gains the readers by presenting interesting findings. The use of statistics

Read More

Review Of Nate Silver's The Signal And The Noise

1067 Words | 5 Pages

Silver efficiently uses many different examples in order to illustrate the central point of that statistics is all about context, without context the data means nothing. A particularly poignant example is the entire situation of terrorism. In the book, Silver points that terrorism is quite similar to the logarithmic scale of seismology (logarithmic means that each value after each previous value is ten times higher than the previous value). This is particularly striking because it makes an example of saying that if the events of 9/11 were an 8 on the scale, what would a 9 be? Silver’s usage of all these examples such as poker, baseball, climate change, and financial markets gives it a universal appeal as almost all of the U.S. population can relate to the examples he presents in the book.

Read More

Psy 315 Week 3 Study

676 Words | 3 Pages

investigating the difference in results of using two different types of plant food Ans: identification of Relationship because trying to identify difference between two types of food. h. calculating the mean score on a final exam for a class of 100 students Ans: data reduction because trying to reduce everything and shows meaningful part. i. studying whether exposure to a certain type of chemical results in more frequent cancer diagnoses Ans: Inference because it tries to conclude how certain types of chemical results in more frequent cancer diagnoses. 3. Tell which type of sampling is used (random, cluster, systematic, convenience, and stratified and give clear reasons to support your answer.

Read More

How Does Linetta Gilbert Use Inductive Reasoning

703 Words | 3 Pages

In both of the article the authors used inductive reasoning. The article Dismantling the Poverty Trap appeals more to logic, and the other One Family 's Story Shows How The Cycle Of Poverty Is Hard To Break appeals to emotion. Inductive reasoning is when the author states the problem first, and then gives solutions to the problem. In Dismantling the Poverty Trap, Linetta Gilbert says that people in poverty have higher birth rates and maternal mortality rates than wealthy americans. ”Those caught in the poverty trap have rates of infant and maternal mortality that are nearly twice as high as those of wealthy Americans.”

Read More

John Galbraith's Conventional Wisdom

920 Words | 4 Pages

2. The argument is introduced at the beginning of chapter three when John Kenneth Galbraith produces the phrase “conventional wisdom” (86). He says that people are instinctively drawn to manipulate statistical information in order to conveniently benefit themselves. The introduction to chapter three is effective and grabs a reader's attention because it asks prospective questions, causing one to do a double take. The authors says “If you can question something that people really care about and find and answer that may surprise them- that is, if you can overturn the conventional

Read More

Hasty Generalization Fallacy

192 Words | 1 Pages

I agree with your example of pathos in this essay. There is possibly an example of the hasty generalization fallacy in this essay. I cannot with certainty say that this statement is 100% accurate, “In our excessive involvement in the affairs of other countries, we are not only living off our assets and denying our own people the proper enjoyment of their resources; we are also denying the world the example of a free society enjoying its freedom to the fullest” (Fulbright). Actually, the entire fourth paragraph also seems like a fallacy to me? How can the Senator truly know this information?

Read More

Examples Of Hasty Generalization

681 Words | 3 Pages

Hasty Generalization/ Conclusion (Dicto Secundum) The first fallacy is an example of a Hasty Generalization. A Hasty Generalization is when there is not enough information to draw a conclusion but one is inappropriately found anyway.

Read More

I Have A Dream Speech Rhetorical Devices

787 Words | 4 Pages

The usage of statistics ensures that the reader knows who the speaker is and who the speaker is talking to, creating a sort of nonexistent

Read More

Examples Of Hasty Generalization

231 Words | 1 Pages

I think we may all be guilty of hasty generalization at one time or another. I know I am guilty of jumping to conclusions without having all the facts. One of my pet peeves is that I don’t like to participate in surveys because I believe that they are a perfect example of hasty generalization because a lot of time key decision can be made based off of these same survey that only take sample for a small percentage of people. At my job it seems as if there is a survey that is sent out at least once a month for something and I delete them as soon as they hit my in box.

Read More

NAEP And Common Core Of Data

552 Words | 3 Pages

The tone is pragmatic because the author lets the report rely the information instead of the author’s opinion on the data and format being easy to skim by the use of bullet points and table of content. The tone is didactic because the purpose and content provide the topics or question that will be answer by the statistical report and pathos evokes the emotion of curiosity. The elements of style in statistical reports shows that the discourse community of statistics focuses on information rather than opinion and teaches the reader of real world problem that need to be looked at over

Read More

Counter Inductivism Research Paper

1524 Words | 7 Pages

The Validity of Inductive Reasoning Knowingly or not, just about all humans live their lives under the Inductivist presumption, using their past experiences and observations to navigate the future, assuming the regularities which have always held true will continue to do so. Skeptics of this are the Counter-inductivists, who point out that using the past to predict the future is not a logically sound method by offering an opposite conclusion. Counter-inductivism seems somewhat silly at first glance, after all, what reason do we have to believe things should radically change from this point forward? This viewpoint arises from an observation on how we construct theories from the data we have collected.

Read More

Inductivism Vs Falsification Theory

1172 Words | 5 Pages

In inductivism, a finite number of specific facts leads to a general conclusion. In falsificationism, definite claims about the world make a law or a theory falsifiable. The more falsifiable a theory is, the better, but not yet being falsified. For falsificationism scientific progress is possible via trial and error. While inductivism is applied to mathematics for instance where generalization is more possible, falsificationism is really common in biology, physics or social sciences, where there is not a general pattern, but many exceptions to the laws or theories.

Read More

Inductive Argument

154 Words | 1 Pages

Every inductive argument must assume that nature is uniform. There is no justification for the assumption that nature is uniform. Therefore, none of our beliefs about the world are justified”(class lecture). Knowledge about the world is still possible because we believe that the nature is uniform. We assume that similar

Read More

Deductive Argument

513 Words | 3 Pages

Culturally, for the sake of arguing I am expected to accept my social status, however going to school changes that status. Inductive argument provide reasoning that supports the conclusion as being true. Whereas, deductive arguments guarantees the truth of a conclusion providing supporting premises. Examples, I operate in the inductive world by hold the door open for

Read More

An Example Of Conductive Reasoning In A Democratic Society

115 Words | 1 Pages

Inductive reasoning is the use of paradigm examples that leads to a general conclusion. Deductive reasoning includes enthymemes (syllogism) composed with three parts: major premise, minor premise and conclusion. For example, if I use all men are mortal as a major premise and Gil is a man as a minor premise, then the conclusion will be Gil is mortal. These rhetorical techniques help speakers to defeat themselves when the decisions of judges are not what they ought to be. As a result, since people are free to use rhetoric to express what they believe is right, democratic society can be formed where issues are resolved by a free exchange of views among members of public.

Read More

More about Inductive Arguments Of Statistical And Casual Generalization

Related Topics

Open Document