“Black Code: Surveillance, Privacy, and the Dark Side of the Internet,” written by Ronald J. Deibert, outlines different issues and benefits that have arised due to the growing use of the internet. Deibert begins his essay providing information about the internet such as the rapid growth of smartphones, how the internet has taken over most of societies lives, and key differences between previous technological innovations compared to the internet. He continues his essay by discussing the U.S.A. Patriot Act and how this law should be retracted based on the fact that various companies, like Google, can give the government our personal searches if they ask. Then, he talks about various types of cyber crimes and how we need stronger regulations to control the internet so these crimes would not be possible. Deibert concludes his essay explaining how the internet has provided many benefits in today’s nation, but the internet needs stricter regulations for our own protection.
In the world today it is alarming the amount of information that can be traced back to an individual. This isn’t a hacker in the dead of night, this is tiny bits of information that can be acquired in broad daylight by unsuspecting characters. No, it’s not the neighborhood weirdo. The pride of American capitalism, the private companies, have been at the heart of the issue of the individual's privacy. In a world of exponentially advancing technology, the concern of the violation of citizen’s privacy is the in the forefront of everyone’s minds.
In the article written by Nicholas Carr, Tracking is an Assault on Liberty, he divulges the ideas that our civil liberties on the internet are under attack which leaves an imminent danger on our individual privacies. The article covers topics pertaining to the urgent awareness of the violation to citizens privacy online, the obtainment of our personal information being recorded through our IP addresses and computers, and the idea that the retainment of our personal information can withhold an influence on our behaviors and thoughts. The article holds a more negative stance on the violation of people privacy with warning and educating people to take prerogative to preserve their privacy. This article further educates the audience
The internet, government, and corporations are all out to get you, or at least that is what Bruce Schneier would like convince you of in his work titled “The Internet Is a Surveillance State”. Schneier identifies many reasons as to why a surveillance state is a negative, such as constant tracking, habit profiling, and lack of privacy both in public and in the comfort of your own home. What Schneier fails to address, however, is that a surveillance state isn’t always a negative, and quite possibly it is a necessary evil to prevent bad things from happening around the globe. As Whitney Cramer states in her essay titled “Giving up Our Privacy: Is it Worth It?” , Schneier “fails to acknowledge” that the “loss of privacy to protect the innocent
"Internet privacy has recently been a hotly debated issue. If the government does not have probable cause or a warrant to monitor internet activity, then they are not permitted to do so. I base this off of the Fourth Amendment: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ” Making this claim, I believe that the Patriot Act, the National Security Agency’s surveillance, and practices like these are illegal.
Though it does not say that the states, nor do local government has the luxury of this right. So a federal agency such as the FBI, or the CIA will, and should have access to what us Americans have been doing via the internet.
Technology and Privacy Online In today’s world of technology, being connected to the Internet is a part of everyday life. With that said, users have valid concerns about online privacy and their right to privacy. Though, after the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks the United States citizens looked to their government for answers and security. For instance, at the demands of the its citizens, the United States government enacted “The War on Terror,” which took away certain civil liberties of the citizens, including their right to privacy in the name of national security.
The government has many tools in looking into people's information but the government doesn't realize that it is violating the 4th amendment by using the resources they have in looking into suspected people and that's the reason why we cannot trust our information to be safe with the government either way. David Cole, a lawyer who teaches constitutional law and national security at Georgetown University, and other legal analysts says that, “The world of computers has weakened the Fourth Amendment. " In the modern digital age, it means very, very little. "(citation). The reason why he says this is because, before we had computers, no one knew who we were seeing or where we were going throughout the day, but if someone were to know they would have to wiretap our things to know.
Despite the benefits governmental surveillance could possess, the laws that prevent invasion of privacy or manipulation simply do not exist. Perhaps if laws such as those were passed, than internet surveillance could be considered justified, however, considering the current situation of the United States, it currently is not. As of now, an Orwellian world seems a too close for comfort, and internet surveillance would only worsen the
The internet is a big part of our lives. It can change our lives and ruin them at the same time, that’s why you have to be careful. Many students are using it for school and parents use it for work. Internet access can change your life by giving you a chance to learn new things and explore and view different things that you’ve never heard or seen before. The internet
By introduction, upon reading Chapter 2 titled “Examining written arguments” I have end up resulting into considering one of short argumentative essay in helping carrying out article analysis described there as, “The internet is a surveillance state” written by Bruce Shinier who put forward the case of how internet has resulted and will continue ruining our lives especially on privacy matters of individuals in the globe, how efforts towards curbing cases of internet tracking without warrant have failed or will never be implemented and also has shown incidences under which internet tracking is promoted globally. Therefore this essay has called for analysis due to weightage of concern it’s trying to bring to the public that is effects of internet use globally, hence an important essay to analyze globally (Schneier, Bruce 2013). Basically the essay was written on March 16 2013 and posted on CNN. In other words the essay was published during the periods when level of technology started becoming evidenced in most nations globally.
This is partly true as recently Google has been more open to discussing that they have provided investigators -- with a warrant of course -- with data results of potential suspects, but protections are in place to prevent this on a large scale. Whereas when discussing local government, it is most likely that local police are not sifting through your emails and internet searches as they do not have the technology to do so. The government may not monitor the internet of average people, but it is totally capable for it to be done on a personal
In order to determine the extent to which the U.S. government has the duty to monitor internet content, it is imperative to first understand that this is a complex issue. With complex issues, there is never a simple answer that is purely black or white. The answer lies in a grey area where the government must protect the safety and well being of its constituents while also guaranteeing their right to privacy. The Preamble of the Constitution outlines the goals that the founding fathers had for the United States, which are still very relevant to contemporary issues of the United States.
“Once you’ve lost your privacy, you realize you’ve lost an extremely valuable thing” - Billy Graham. “Invasion of privacy is a legal term. It is used to describe a circumstance where an individual or organization knowingly intrudes upon a person. The intrusion occurs when the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as in a bathroom or locker room”(Winston). There are many factors that help with the loss of privacy these days.
Many people hold strong on the belief that internet should be a place where information and data flows freely. Yet, from the government point of view, freedom isn’t always a good thing. There is also a point of view to counter and protect against child pornography or hate speech. Others include religious factor, terrorism as well as other sensitive information for different group of people in terms of age, countries and parties.
