In this article the researchers make it aware to the audience that with all of the wrongfully convicted cases in the United States, 16% have been a result of false confessions. With that being said, 22% of these trials have led to individuals being sentenced to death. People who confess to crimes that they did not commit do it for multiple reasons. In this article they talk about a few. In Canada they did a study and found that interrogators that used minimization and maximization techniques during the interrogation were more successful at getting a confession than those who did not use those techniques. This study examines the relationship between interrogative compliance and false confession. The researchers wanted to see how this information …show more content…
During this process, 33 participants didn’t finish all of the measurement, so the sample size fell down to 607. The sample consisted of 156 males and 483 females in which there were 388 Caucasians, 105 Biracial, 79 Asians, 31 African Americans, 31 Middle Easterners, and 6 Aboriginals. They merged the data from two different studies together. Both of these studies had to do with personality traits, taking the blame, and compliance. For the first study they contacted students through the Internet and had them fill out the questionnaire online. For the second sample they also contacted the participants online but had them come in and do the questionnaire in person with the researchers there. In this study they used the Self-Report Psychopathy-Short Form (SRP-SF), which is used to measure psychopathic traits, the Gudjonsson Compliance Scale (GCS), which measures levels of compliance in a person, the Antisocial Behavior Scale/False Confession-Modified (ABS) which measures false confessions, and finally the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) which measures the five factor model of personality