ipl-logo

Is Edward Snowden A Hero Or A Villain

487 Words2 Pages

Edward Snowden, a former Central Intelligence Agency employee, recently exposed the National Security Agency's program "PRISM" and is now hiding in another country. This outbreak of events spurred a concerning debate between having better security or having more privacy. On one half of the government spectrum lies the supporters of government surveillance, who are convinced that having better security is far more important than having more privacy. Notably, according to the supporters of government surveillance these programs allow the government to stop any form of terrorism before it occurs. Unfortunately, Edward Snowden became a villain that betrayed the country to those who believed in what the National Security Agency was doing. On the other half of …show more content…

Utilizing the concept of consequentialism, an individual could label Snowden as a villain or a hero by understanding not only the benefits of government surveillance, but the costs of government surveillance as well. After weighing the costs and benefits of government surveillance, he or she can decide whether or not Snowden is a hero or a villain. An individual who gains happiness or utilities/services from Edward Snowden's actions would most likely consider him a hero. In contrast, an individual who loses happiness or utilities/services from Edward Snowden's actions would most likely consider him a villain. In essence, the consequentialist viewpoint can not provide enough evidence on the identity of Snowden as a hero or a villain because not everyone is benefited or hurt by government surveillance programs. Ultimately, each individual would be effected by government surveillance programs differently; therefore, depending on the individual, Snowden can be considered either a hero or a

Open Document