ipl-logo

Is This Document, What Kind Of Leader Was Augustus?

752 Words4 Pages

What kind of leader was Augustus?

Round 1

Document Based on this document, what kind of leader was Augustus? Evidence from document to support these reasons Is this document reliable? Why or why not?
A& B: Map and Coins He was a leader that was determined to expand his kingdom and his empire grew significantly. He also influenced future expansion. He was a great military leader. He wanted fame and was prideful, but he also respected Julius Caesar. There is a large amount of dark area in the map but there was also a great part of the light colored area. The dark color shows the empire before his death and the light colored shows the empire after his death. He has Caesar’s name on the front of the coin and his face, associating himself with …show more content…

Evidence from document to support these reasons Is this document reliable? Why or why not?
C: Augustus Augustus is a humble, good and peaceful ruler, who was trying to achieve Pax Romana by bringing all provinces and colonies together. He really cared about his He brought peace to the sea, Gaul, Spain and Germany. He gave out grains and money to men when taxes fell short. I don’t think this document is reliable as I may have been biased as he is writing about himself. Anybody would say nice things about themselves.
D: Soldier Augustus is a good leader; he brought peace and treated everyone equally. He brought prosperity. He changed laws, and agriculture was brought back. Augustus also didn’t have a desire for power but for empire and people (citizens). Augustus respected religion and each person had their own freedom. It is unreliable and he is under Augustus’s rule and he wouldn’t say anything about bad about his leader or he might get killed.

Round 3

Document Based on this document, what kind of leader was Augustus? Evidence from document to support these reasons Is this document reliable? Why or why …show more content…

He was also a kind and good leader. Augustus didn’t let anyone call him a “Sire” even by accident. He also left and entered towns at night, so no one felt that they needed to give him special treatment. He also comforts his subjects when they are having problems. This document is reliable as he was born around the time of Octavian, just the generation after him. He is a not person of a different country that opposes him or a government official, so he might be informing his readers the real thing. He is not pressurized to right good things like the solider or Augustus

Show More
Related
654 Words | 3 Pages

Also it seems that the late politicians of the Roman empire had lost sight of what was most important: their empire. However, they only cared about how much power they had. Many of them plotted on how they could overthrow the emperor. They even fought each other over it when the time and energy could have been put toward fighting their enemies. They had only cared about power and money, even though that was something the Romans were running low

Read More
2227 Words | 9 Pages

From the rise to the fall of Rome, Scholars have been interpreting the historical documents of Rome for centuries. “753 the first Roman king, Romulus, founded an advisory council of 100 men. This body would become the Senate” (Muscato , 2016). The establishment

Read More
1270 Words | 6 Pages

Augustus Caesar impacted the development of the Roman Empire by gaining popularity as a powerful dictator, bringing a period of Pax Romana (Roman Peace), and creating a Hellenistic Culture. One aspect of Augustus Caesar was that he had gained popularity and was seen as a great leader/dictator by the community and the government

Read More
461 Words | 2 Pages

He had made Rome safer with police and fire brigades. He also did not make himself a selfish dictator like most rulers in the last millennium. Augustus's life had many twists and turns but he was one who could see how being a good and unselfish ruler could change an entire century of people. His life took a turn and had ended up in a twisted ditch and had died in A.D

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Augustus was the ruler of the Roman empire from 27 BC to his death in AD 14. Documents throughout history describes Augustus from the author's perspective. Even though, people alive can't tell from their knowledge of what kind of leader Augustus was, documents can help us determine this. Augustus was portrayed with a positive image from some articles and with bad qualities from other articles. From a self written list about events that happened in his life to a soldiers thoughts, to historians' research, Augustus is portrayed in many ways.

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

He managed to hold up Rome with his strength and character for his lifetime. The senate felt threatened by him so they killed him. There was a wide range of emotions and it started many civil wars. This completely caused a change in the government, and borught about the Roman Empire. Afterwards Octavian became the emperor that the new Roman Empire needed.

Read More
546 Words | 3 Pages

This corresponding perception can be acknowledged as according to Suetonius, Augustus “…could neither satisfy the veterans nor the landowners, since… they were not being treated as their services had led them to hope.” This same issue was also further addressed and revealed throughout Tacitus’s works as he exclaimed that in order to keep the veterans and landowners quiet, to consequently maintain his impeccable appearance, “Augustus won over the soldiers with gifts, the populace with cheap corn.” On the other hand, although Tacitus and Suetonius’s viewpoint could be perceived as bribery or enticement another individual, such as that in favour of Augustus, could of seen it as generous and substantial, in hand showing a pure demonstration of how alternate perspectives may be predisposed by the early judgment of an individual such as

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

He supported the arts and sciences, patronizing artists, writers, and philosophers. Caesar also encouraged the expansion of public education, making it more accessible to all citizens. His support for intellectual pursuits helped to foster a climate of creativity and innovation in Roman society. Overall, Julius Caesar's rule of Rome had many positive aspects that contributed to the prosperity and stability of the empire. His military conquests, social and economic reforms, legal and governance reforms, and support for the arts and sciences all had a lasting impact on Roman society.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

Augustus vs. Sergio Simon Sinek once said, “ great leaders are willing to sacrifice the numbers to save the people.” Augustus Caesar has been a great leader throughout history, he has lead his armies to great victories and has shown his loyalty to his people. Sergio Mattarella recently became the president of Italy and already has done great things like making Italy a better place and wanting to help fix the budget.

Read More
1096 Words | 5 Pages

This proved his worthiness to being ruler by justifying his abilities to provide for and protect his empire. Since the Romans did not like that title of king, “he received the title Augustus by decree of the senate.” During his reign, Caesar accomplish countless things, which is why he is still talked highly about to this day. He repaired the conduits of aqueducts, dozens of temples, and completed the Julian forum and the basilica. He did these things because, like Qin, he loved and truly cared about his empire and wanted to see it flourish and restored; not broken and destroyed.

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

Historians have been able to learn a lot about the Roman government. Two common themes in Cicero’s writings were “duty to country” and “duty to man.” Throughout his career, Cicero delivered over 100 speeches on topics including philosophy, rhetoric, ethics, law and religion. Many were written in the Latin language of which Cicero was a master. The texts of fifty-seven of these speeches has survived.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
1487 Words | 6 Pages

The causes that created the Civil war between Octavian and Marcus Antonius Manisha Minhas 3009802 The civil war between Octavian and Mark Antony had lasted fourteen years that transformed the collapsing Imperial era into the Roman Empire. The conflicts that had created the war between Octavian and Mark Antony could have been avoidable. These conflicts had been about the control over not only the government but also the hold of military power.

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

Emperor Charles V ruled over a vast amount of land for a little less than 40 years. However, he faced many challenges that ultimately prevented him from unifying Europe under one ruler. When he first gained authority, He had control over places including Germany, Bohemia, Switzerland, and parts of Northern Italy. This also included land in Austria and Spain, as well as the colonies Spain controlled in other parts of the world. Even though Charles V ruled over a vast amount of land, he never established lasting control over the area.

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

Augustus had made many important reforms in his rule, by having to control everything in Rome and making the senators work for him to build and do the thing for him. The senates were an advisory body whose advice becomes law via the consuls, praetors, and by confirmation by the assemblies of the citizens in Rome. Augustus had mad the laws so strongly that if women or a man do anything behind his back, he willpower send them to a different region, and get them killed by putting them with the animals to die. When Augustus made the laws across he directly made his plans to the people to present his Tribunician

Read More

More about Is This Document, What Kind Of Leader Was Augustus?

Related Topics

Open Document