Isolation In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

791 Words4 Pages

In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelly, many themes motifs and symbols appear throughout the duration of the novel including themes of isolation,rejection revenge and dark romanticism, motifs such as letters, abortion, and retrospection and symbols of the moon, light and fire and god. However the most important theme, isolation, seems to be the backbone behind it all. Isolation has a remarkable effect on the way both,Victor and the Monster act and participate in society.
Frankenstein is a story full of murder, despair and tragedy, all of which follow a path back to the main characters lack of social interaction and skills to function normally in society due to isolation. For instance, while Victor spent many days and long hours working …show more content…

Victor was all the monster had so once rejected and isolated by his creator, the Monster escaped out on his own. He became vengeful because the isolation fueled hatred and anger within him drove him to …show more content…

The novel is deeply concerned with communication between the characters and people of the story. As such, proof of communication between people is often shown in the form of letters, both within the story such as when the monster shows letters from his upbringing to Victor Frankenstein and the fact that the narrative is the collection of Walton's letters to his sister. The letters also help bring in different viewpoints of the story. The letters at the end of the story have a major impact on Frankenstein’s overall appeal. Similar to the letters in the beginning, the reader gets Robert Walton’s personal experiences with Frankenstein. This time, however, Frankenstein reveals his less heroic self as he tells Walton that “he would not recognize frankenstein in this state of degradation.” If the entire novel was in narration by Frankenstein, the reader would only know him as a glorified scientist but through the letters we discover that he is a “miserable wretch.” The readers have these letters to see the scientist in a different way than he would have portrayed himself to