More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare the articles of confederation with the constitution
Federalist no. 10
Comparing the articles of confederation and constitution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Madison’s essay reflects the fear many had of a tyrannical government and the desire to ensure that the country didn’t revert back to that which it had just escaped from. He notes the necessity to prevent any one faction or group from gaining too much power and oppressing those in the minority. The separation of powers was set in place to ensure that this could not happen. Even if one group decides they want something, the other two have the equal authority to prevent it should it not represent the country as a whole.
James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.
Federalist No. 10 was the first of Madison’s contribution to the Federalist Papers and many argue that it is one of the most famous, and Federalist No. 1 was by Hamilton and became the first of many essays to be written. Madison emphasis in No. 10 that factions arise from divisions in the community because of diversity and movement of people, and that they can cause damage and violence. He is arguing in favor of the Constitution because it establishes a government that is able to control the damage caused by factions. And in Federalist No. 1, Hamilton talks about how the people are in a very rare position to decide if “societies of men” are able to establish good government. He believed that the nation could become one and have a strong foundation
10 in an attempt to ratify the Constitution, the new form of government for the United States. In the Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison analyzed the way to deal with facts, made a comparison between a pure democracy and a republic, and made another comparison on whether a small government or a large government would be the best for America. He informed the people that there is not a way to completely get rid of factions, but there are ways to deal with them. One great way to deal with factions is by having a government that knows how to control and deal with their effects. Madison believes that a republic can do that job better than a democracy, because a democracy is a small society of people who can not admit there is a cure to factions.
1787 was a time of change for government, and everyone had an opinion for how things should be ran. When James Madison wrote the Federalist Papers, Number 10 was about parties in government, or as he called them, “factions”. Madison says that an advantage of a “well constructed Union” would be the ability to “break and control the violence of faction”, yet he goes on to say that you cannot remove factions without removing liberty, and that will never happen. He said the only option was to try and control faction’s effects. In paragraph 8, he says that “the most powerful faction must be expected to prevail”; in other words, the most popular party with the majority of people and influence is expected to prevail over the minority party.
what Madison is talking about with this form is from my understanding is that the people should be the ones with the power, so they don’t go back to how it was before winning the revolutionary war. I would have to say that I agree with Madison’s
In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton lays out his vision for how the Supreme Court of the United States should function. In it, he assures that one of the key roles of the Supreme Court will be to check the constitutionality of congressional legislation in order to protect the individual rights of the people. However, in his opinion for the Marbury v. Madison case in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall interprets the power of judicial review from Article III of the constitution, in a way in which the court becomes a powerful branch of government. With Marshall’s interpretation, the court is able to “strike down” legislation by the command of the people which is embedded in the Constitution (O’Brien 173). Hamilton intended for the court to
Federalist #10 Synthesis and Analysis The article titled "Federalist 10" by James Madison means to me that equality means everything. James Madison is trying to say in this article that you cannot dodge factions; they are going to be in every society because different people have different options, but what you can fix is making sure everyone is balanced. The balance will help one side not get all the power; consequently, the other side barely gets any. " Federalist 10" can be used in different ways besides government matters.
Duvalois1 Kaitlyn Duvalois Professor Jorgensen PLS 135 September 25, 2015 Madison The United States Constitution is every Americans structured guideline to the rights and wrongs. We all basically go hand-in-hand everyday with the constitution whether we notice it or not.
As previously talked about in The Federalist 10, the majority group most often threatens the rights of the minorities. Madison believes that there are only two ways to avoid the wrongs brought about by citizens. The first solution is to create a powerful government. This solution would be chancy because a government of this type may place power behind a certain group that is working against the common good. Ultimately if this occurred, the purpose for creating a powerful government would be overlooked.
As stated in The Federalist No. 10, James Madison explains the arguments occurring between those who possess property of land and those who are not. The unfair distribution of property brings a conflict between classes, explaining a common cause of factions. In fact, the antagonism between the “creditors” and “debtors”, defined by James Madison, was impacted strongly by their opinions. Additionally, their opinion on certain topics such as religion and the Government are naturally influenced by their diversity. Therefore, different perceptions based on their “different degree of activity” plummet high into the category of creating their own distinguished groups of what they favor known as factions.
This reflection paper involves my insights by responding to questions on Excerpts from the Federalist No.1, written on October 27, 1787. which is one of many essays by Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton tried desperately to defend the constitution for the good of the people even though he had certain doubts and wanted to ratify it. The questions I will be answering are related to what he has written and what my opinions are. I will answer to the best of my knowledge and my thoughts.
James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.
Madison’s audience for this discussion would have been the people. The essays were written to persuade the New York delegation to the Constitutional Convention to vote for the Constitution. The purpose of this paper is to determine whether or not the framers established a republican form of government. In this essay Madison starts by defining and describing a republican government. A republican form of government is one which drives all powers directly or indirectly from the great body of people and administered by people holding their offices during good behavior.
According to federalist 10 suggested by Madison, he identifies the chief danger to a collapse of the Republican government as factionalism where the most numerically strong factions will be able to advance their self-interests at the expense of the minorities and the common good. He fears that the majority factions with different interests would constantly fight with each other that will lead to the eventual collapse of the collective self-government. He recognized that the effects of factions can be controlled through the structure of government which is federalism. The proposed Constitution will minimize the Effects of Factions where the effects are better controlled in larger size of the republic under a representative form of government.
