John Locke And The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights

1689 Words7 Pages

Human rights means equal basic rights for life, dignity, equal opportunity to learn and develop their full potential and creativity. It is the right to be born with the right to be with that person forever whether in any jurisdiction or race, language, religion according to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, "All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” The existence, validity and content of human rights. It is a topic that is constantly debated in both the philosophical and the political. By law, human rights are enshrined in international law and agreements and in the domestic law of many states. The principles …show more content…

This belief of the Locke has been extended by the renewal that everyone has one thing in common since birth. This is the natural right to claim ownership of what God has given. Everyone has the right and equality where there is no one more than the other. Everyone is born with the same natural rights as well as the benefits of intelligence are equal. However, in my perspective, even god has given us to have equal natural rights, human beings are different in perseverance. Some people prefer to be simple. When it is simple, they does not have to do much work to satisfy their needs but just enough to live in the society. In contrast, some people are not happy to be like that. This type of people will work harder than the first type of people. When working hard, the effects of hard work make him more productive as a result of his labor than the first. This is why we have a difference in wealth states although, by nature, everyone has the right to what God has imparted at birth. Apart from the view of Locke, even though other religions do not believe that God created the human world, it has the same belief that everyone has equal rights with such a Buddhist belief that all people are equal because they are under the same natural law. Everybody must be born …show more content…

Locke is considered to be the nature that has been preserved and preserved for the common good of mankind. So man has the right to own these things righteously. These are part of human life. Every human being has a property in his own, because the property is an inalienable right or a right that can not be taken away from human beings as it is a property that belongs to mankind since pre-political society is established. In contrast, Liao's perspective, the fundamental conditions for pursuing a good life are various goods, capacities, and options that human being qua human being needs, whatever they might need in order to pursue the basic activities. These human needs allow human to choose act freely and act fully in their own