Hobbes believed that people do not have the the right to alter a government. Locke believed that people do have the right to alter a government.
He believe in freedom of religion. He became an influential philosopher writing of political philosophy, epistemology and education. His writing helped found modern Western philosophy. In the year 1690 he publish an essay on human understanding which became a very good impact in his career.
He had a large influence on King James I of England. In a speech to the parliament, King James I said “First, that you do not meddle with the main points of government; that is my craft” (doc 1). King James is basically telling the parliament that he is the king and it is his job to rule and they can't tell him what to do. This supports Hobbes philosophy because Hobbes said only one person should rule with very little interference. Locke had an influence on the United States Constitution.
Locke believed that the basic human right is property which went against Hobbe's belief. His two treatises completely changed how Enlightenment thinkers saw everything. One of many important quotes from the second treatise of government that had a major influence on others
As Hobbes believed that each person should be controlled by a ruler that has been provided with absolute power, Locke believed in natural rights. The time that John Locke made his beliefs public was an eventful time in England, especially having to deal with politics. During the time of John Locke, he was able to see the Civil War, Interregnum, Restoration, Exclusion Crisis, and the Glorious Revolution. John Locke still managed to make himself known in a time of incredibly important changing in history. Locke was known for holding administrative positions in government and paying a great deal of attention to contemporary debates in political theory.
He was an English philosopher that made an impact which changed the people’s point of view on government. His contributions were small but frequent. “People are selfish. They are moved chiefly by the desire for power and by fear of others. Thus, without an all-powerful sovereign to rule them, their lives would be "poor, nasty, brutish, and short.
In contrast to John Locke 's successes , Baron de Montesquieu also had an impact on our government. Originally named Charles Louis de Secondat, Montesquieu was born in Bordeaux France in 1689. Montesquieu did a lot of thinking about how a government was to be created and then maintained. The term liberty to him meant "a peace of mind that comes from being safe", with this in mind he came to believe that safety could only exist if laws were followed. If the government was able to to enforce laws,that could be easily followed, then that would increase "liberty" and improve our world.
He was an inspiration to many people including Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Immanuel Kant, he helped figure out the way the american government runs today. He modified the more radical teachings of Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli. His politics, appear from the involvement of underlying radical, modern premises about religion and morality. Locke presents his case for what we would call modern liberal democracy. He created the modern strength on the constitution that defines, in part, the
In Tim Burton's cold classic film titled Edward Scissorhands, he explores the idea that to understand the reality of a situation, you need to look farther and deeper into a person rather than judge their character at first sight just by their appearances. He is able to distribute and convey this idea through the film's directed lighting, leveled and precise camera angles as well as the use of framing, and the use of mixing loud and soft music and diegetic sounds. Burton’s intended purpose of the film is to educate and persuade the audience into reaching an emotional level of understanding among their peers and be able to emphasize one's character and true intentions through expressions. Lastly, in order for Burton to make his film of relevance
John Locke, a great philosopher, made a great contribution to the Enlightenment ideology for both society and government. His ideas were contradictory to the ideas of Hobbes. Since, they were complete opposites. Locke believed that human nature was good while Hobbes believed that human nature was bad. Hobbes argued that his idea was right, and that for people to escape that horrible way of living, they had to give their rights away to a strong absolute leader or ruler and in return they got law and order.
Locke truly believed that citizens are capable of reasoning and governing themselves. He gravely warned that if people were continuously mistreated and denied their natural rights, they would rebel against the
They began to see that people have rights that must be protected even from government” (iCivics 1). On the other hand, Hobbes thought that the whole purpose of the government was to have one ruler that would have total authority over everyone. The author explains, “Hobbes believed a single sovereign, or ruler, should have total authority over the people. He believed in a monarchy led by a king. That’s because he thought that government would work best if all the power rested in one place” (iCivics 1).
In the Thomas Hobbes mindset the world was bellum omnium contraomnes or a war of all against all. Hobbes believed that absolute government was the best and that this government needed a powerful ruler who was beyond challenge. In his book Leviathan published in 1651, it shows a giant in power over everyone and everything to keep the peace. Hobbes thought that an absolute government kept people from destroying each other because life before government was solitary,brutish,nasty, poor and short.
He believed that all people are born with three natural rightslife, liberty, and property. Hobbes and Locke: Views on Government Hobbes The only way to create a government is to give the power and strength to one man… men will give up their right of governing oneself to this man. This is more than just giving up their individuality; it is the real unity of them all. This done, so united in one person, is called a commonwealth.
When comparing the two different accounts of English philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke we must take into consideration a number of things such as the age in which they lived and the time in which they produced their philosophical writings. We will however find out that these two philosophers actually have a couple of things in which agree on even though most of their opinions clash. On one side we have Thomas Hobbes who lived in the time of the English Civil War (1642-1651) who provides a negative framework for his philosophical opinions in his masterpiece Leviathan and who advocates for philosophical absolutism . On the other side we have John Locke, living during the glorious revolution (1688-1689) he presents a positive attitude in his book The Second Treatise of Government and advocates for philosophical and biblical constitutionalism. It is important that we know that the state of nature describes a pre- political society prior to the social contract.
