More handpicked essays just for you.
Identify a discourse community and state reasons why it is a discourse community
Paper on discourse communities
Paper on discourse communities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Leonardo Muro-Garcia Professor Benjamin Dally English 5 (Section 2) October 23rd, 2015 Sacramento High School Baseball Baseball History: The first organized game was played in Hoboken, New Jersey, on June 19, 1846. The Knickerbockers faced a team called the New York Nines, who won the game 23 to 1.The baseball we play today still follows many of the rules Cartwright thought up in 1845. (Creative Classroom April/May 1990) According to Erik Borg, a “discourse community” is a community where the “members actively share goals and communicate with other members to pursue those goals” (398).
For me, the logos, pathos and ethos perspective of joining a discourse community I had been part of, taught me a lesson about interpersonal skills, organizational systems and professionalism. My aim of this paper is to share my experience of joining Chitwan Pharmacy Student Association (CPSA) via use of rhetorical skills that we have discussed in class of English 1301.
In an article discussing the concepts of discourse communities John Swales says that, “A discourse community has a broadly agreed set of common public goals… mechanisms of
A discourse community has a broadly agreed set of common public goals. A discourse community has mechanisms of intercommunication among its members. A discourse community uses its participatory mechanisms primarily to provide information and feedback. A discourse community utilizes and hence possess on
What I believe Swales is trying to convey is that there needs to be a mix of novices, and experts in a discourse community. There also should be members who hold more power when compared to other members who might be inexperienced in the community. In Swales’ article “The Concept of Discourse Community” he goes on to convey six defining characteristics a discourse community possesses, however Swales’ article is similar to other scholars as he does not breakdown what gives the more powerful members authority other than stating that they have more experience. If you explore James Porter’s article “Intertextuality and the Discourse Community” you can discern a unique example of a discourse community’s hierarchy that gives fair insight on possible
In the article "The Concept of a Discourse Community" by John Swales (1990). He aimed to define the meaning of a discourse community; then he carefully deconstructs discourse community into six fundamental attributes that are important for recognizing a discourse community. Swales’ definition of a discourse community is a group that has objectives or purposes, and utilize communication to accomplish those objectives. He states that a discourse community is presented as a more practical and purposeful gathering than speech fraternity or speech group. The six essential characteristics that Swales (1990) belief to be the core of a discourse community are its goals, intercommunication, participation, genres, Lexis, and expertise.
A discourse community is a group of people that share a set of values and goals. Members of a discourse community have their own way of communicating within the group and with the public. Although the communities may differ in subject matter and appearance, they do share varying levels of similarities. The three-discourse communities that we will be focusing on are: art, research biology and finance: specifically, the financial service sector. Furthermore, we will be comparing the three-discourse communities on: similarities among all the groups, similarities between each group and the differences among all three.
For instances, in the second project of ‘Definition argument’, Swales’ second characteristics states, “A discourse community has mechanism of intercommunication among its members” (Swales, 471) and I interpreted as, “In other words, the only way to be part of a discourse community is to interact with each other. A community in which members share the same goals, but do not connect with other community members is not a discourse community” (Pandya 10). This helped me not only to understand the academic writing, but also to analyze it critically and interpret it into simple
Genres to communicatively further the discourse community goals Firms in the financial service industry perform the following tasks: investing, lending, insurance, securities trading, and securities issuance. To provide the best service to its clients’ firms utilize several channels of communication they include publications, Podcasts to discuss general trends that shape financial markets, online platforms that makes it easier for clients to be engaged and stay on top of their financial affairs. Level of members with relevant discourse expertise Within the financial service industry, there are levels of expertise an employee might require, this includes: an undergraduate college degree at minimum. Additionally, an employee develops level of
We communicate in many ways, either by email, telephone, text, face to face, social media or letters and the language we use allows us to get things done, nonetheless the language and communication method in which we chose to use can vary depending on the discourse community. Much like John Swales suggests a discourse community involves a group of people who share the same common public goals, such as shared interests, rules, structure, and vocabulary. When thinking about the several discourse communities I am evolved in, which include family, coaching football, college student, and a few friends. These discourse communities have influenced me, given me insight of where I come from and tell who I am as a person. I also believe much like Swales,
Creations, like most things in life, are improvable. Ideas and theories are always evolving into different ideas or more sophisticated ones. Discourse communities is a term that has been debated over the years. Three of those debaters are James Paul Gee, James P. Porter, and John Swales. In this essay I will analyze what each of these writers see as the definition of a discourse community while comparing specific points that each of them have regarding their personal view on the subject.
Mirabelli helped me decide what discourse community I want to study. Like Mirabelli, I am going to study a discourse community that I was a part of. After reading the extensive knowledge Mirabelli had on the community, I realized it aided his ethnographic study. Without prior knowledge of the community, an ethnographic study is harder to complete. I also noticed the passion Mirabelli had for the discourse community he studied.
An important discourse community that was a part of my life was my volleyball team during my four years of high school. I started playing my first year going into high school and continued until I graduated. Until now I wasn’t even aware that would even be considered a discourse community, but it fits all of the qualifications of Swales’ definition of a discourse community. Goals
When I created the hubs within the concept map, it became evident that there were foundational pieces that built upon each other and as such I will seek to explore the different concepts through a building of ideas. The bottom and most fundamental piece of the concept map is discourse. According to Gee, discourse is “a socially accepted association among ways of using language, of thinking, and of acting that can be used to identify oneself as a member of a socially meaningful group or “social network” (1992, pp. 21). This is the umbrella term of which the rest of the concepts within this particular layer relate.
In addition, the external function or purpose is not determined unless the context and participant are taken into account (i.e., all the pertaining situational, social and cultural factors) in which a fraction of discourse appears (Marianne Celce-murcia & Elite Olshtain, 2000). Cook (1989 regards discourse as “the language in use” (p. 6). According to Firth (1930) speech is produced in a social situation nurtured and nourished by cultural context. Carter and Nunan propound (2001) that “Discourse analysts deal with speeches( i.e. sequences of words written or spoken in certain situations) rather than with sentences (sequence of words conforming , or not, to the rules of grammar for the construction of phrase , clauses, etc.) ”
