ipl-logo

Jonathan Glover Abortion

624 Words3 Pages

The controversy of the ethics of abortion is more complex than it seems, as pro-life supporters want the freedom of the fetus and the pro-choice supporters freedom of women. In the book review titled “Matters of Life and Death”, Jonathan Glover uses the analysis of three books to discuss the debate of abortion. Glover takes a more pro-choice stance in the matter, concluding that a fetus has the right to life only when he or she develops a minimal level of self-consciousness; in the process, he promotes the freedom of women to make their own decisions. Freedom is seen as an essential part in society, especially to Americans. Abortion arises so much debate due to social issues ranging from feminism to the potential parenthood of an infant. …show more content…

After establishing the difficulty of creating boundaries regarding the status of a fetus, Glover argues that one must be self-conscious in order to be considered a person. With this in mind, infants will not be considered human beings until the age of two or three years of age. It appears to be a horrifying thought that infanticide can be justified when denying the right to life. Only during rare cases where the infant has abnormalities can infanticide be defended (2, Glover, CC 2015 p. 0162). Glover believes that a person has a right to life only when one becomes self-aware, but infanticide can never happen due to moral judgement and the emotions that develop. Infanticide has a dehumanizing effect in people; moral feelings develop between the parent and infant. Once the infant is out of the womb, he or she cannot be morally considered as disposable material (3, Glover, CC 2015 p. 0164). However, with the definition of personhood explained by Glover, no person actually dies in an act of abortion. Glover concludes that the act of forcing women to endure pregnancy and restricting women of their freedom to choose not only involves a degree of misery, but can be seen as morally evil (4, Glover, CC 2015 p.

Show More
Related

Summary Of Defense Of Abortion By Judith Jarvis Thomson

565 Words | 3 Pages

Analysis Perhaps the most popular argument made against abortion is that the fetus is a person. Based on this assertion, the fetus has a moral right to life. The problem that Thomson identifies is that most of the anti-abortionist and pro-life supporters rely solely on this aspect for their argument and do not rationalize any other matter.

Read More

Review Of Don Marquis's Argument 'Future-Like-Ours'

943 Words | 4 Pages

Abortion is a topic that has been debated for decades, with arguments coming from sides of “pro-life” or “pro-choice”. However, it has also been discussed and debated of the morality of abortion and the moral obligations mothers do, or do not, hold as carriers of these fetuses. Philosopher Don Marquis develops a clear argument in relation to the morality of abortion, to which he expresses the idea that abortion is almost always seriously immoral with rare exceptions allowed for specific scenarios. While his argument eludes the question of at what point a fetus becomes a fully developed member of the wider moral community, he bases this idea on,”...the view that an aborted fetus loses the future goods of consciousness, such as the pursuit of

Read More

Don Marquis's 'Why Abortion Is Immoral'

1431 Words | 6 Pages

By failing to define the terms ‘fetus’ and ‘standard fetus’, he leaves open for interpretation not only the moral significance of the terms, but also their strength in relation to his argument. Marquis assumes that the fetus has a future that is just as valuable as that of an adult yet fails to grant the fetus the same moral status as an adult. This lack of consistency along with the falsity of his claims weakens his argument and leaves a large piece of the abortion question unanswered. Because many of his premises are false, I altered them to be correct which in turn resulted in an illogical sequence of evidence for Marquis’ original conclusion; rendering his argument invalid. After altering the conclusion to follow the revised premises, it only gave a suitable claim for some abortions, rather than the overwhelming majority of abortions.

Read More

Mary Anne Warren's On The Moral Permissibility Of Infanticide

625 Words | 3 Pages

Even today, there are many moral and philosophical issues that divide the United States because they create very polarized opinions and beliefs. One such philosophical issue is the moral permissibility of infanticide. Mary Anne Warren, a philosopher, presents her liberal yet controversial views on the issue of infanticide in the postscript of her article, On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion. However, the anti-infanticide arguments pose problems for Warren’s position because they justify the immorality of infanticide through the physical similarity in resemblance of neonates to human beings. These arguments also claim that the destruction of a viable infant is needless because even if the infant’s biological parents reject the infant, there are many other parents who are willing to adopt and nurture that infant.

Read More

Summary Of Marquis Arguments On Abortion

598 Words | 3 Pages

Marquis’ argument on abortion solely rests on the claim that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to live. Thomson, on the other hand, tries to convey the point that this type of argument against abortion is an inadequate account of the morality of abortion. To begin with, Thomson explains her points through a series of thought experiments that she used as analogies to different situations where a woman could be pregnant but wishes to terminate her pregnancy. Thomson’s analogies are unique because she does not mention the personhood-factor—argument on which antiabortion is entirely based. Even though throughout her arguments she never does agree that a fetus is in fact a person, she still grants the probability that they are a person and

Read More

Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion Thomson

802 Words | 4 Pages

In “A Defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson, she argues for the claim that even if a fetus is a person from conception (and has a full right to life), a pregnant woman still has the right to have an abortion even if she is characterized as self-centered. There is a case where she should not choose to have an abortion because it is seen as morally wrong (435). The opposition to abortion relies on the idea that a fetus is a human being from the moment they are conceived, instead of explaining how that makes abortion wrong. The opposition to abortion would argue that everyone has a right to life, including a fetus, and the mother does have a right to her body, but a person’s right to life is more important, so the fetus should not be killed

Read More

Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion Thomson

1530 Words | 7 Pages

In “A Defense of Abortion” Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is not always immoral, even when we assume for the sake of argument that a fetus is an innocent person. In cases of rape and even some cases of protected consensual sex, Thomson says it is not immoral for a woman to kill a fetus by denying it use of her body. There are two pieces to Thompson’s argument. First, she rejects the common assumption that to kill an innocent person is always morally wrong. And she uses a clever counterexample (the violinist) to show that even aside from the case where you would need to kill an innocent person to save your own life, it is not always morally wrong to kill someone by denying him use of your body when he needs it to live.

Read More

Why Don Marquis's Essay 'Why Abortion Is Immoral'

3011 Words | 13 Pages

Anthony Miller Dr. Shane Duarte Philosophy University Seminar March 23, 2024 The Permissibility of Abortion I, Anthony Miller, did not use any sort of AI to write this paper. In Don Marquis’s paper, “Why Abortion is Immoral,” he carefully explains why he considers abortion to be wrong and morally impermissible. His first claim is that if we believe that killing an adult is impermissible, then we have no way to prove that killing a fetus is permissible. Marquis claims that killing a fetus is seriously wrong and is only considered permissible in a few circumstances.

Read More

Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion Judith Thomson

1070 Words | 5 Pages

In “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Thomson argues with a unique approach regarding the topic of abortion. For the purpose of the argument, Thomas agrees to go against her belief and constructs an argument based on the idea that the fetus is a person at conception. She then formulates her arguments concerning that the right to life is not an absolute right. There are certain situations where abortion is morally permissible. She believes that the fetus’s right to life does not outweigh the right for the woman to control what happens to her own body.

Read More

Abortion: Don Marquis And Judith Jarvis Thomson

496 Words | 2 Pages

In his article titled “Why Abortion is Immoral,” Don Marquis argues that the sustenance of human life is a moral obligation that every individual should uphold. He states that abortion is immoral, except in rare cases, and that it is the same as killing an innocent person (RT, 99). Marquis demonstrates that abortion is the same as killing an adult. Marquis comes up with a new strategy to identify what makes killing wrong. He states that first, one must identify why killing a human is wrong and then applying that response to abortion (RT, 101).

Read More

Thomson Arguments Against Abortion

461 Words | 2 Pages

Judith Jarvis Thomson, the author of this article, provides several defenses for abortion, but makes it crystal clear that possessing the right to abort does not equal to the right to kill. A fetus may be seen as an innocent human being with the right to live, but there are plenty of reasons why abortion may be justified. This is an issue that anti-abortion protestors seem to overlook. Pro-life advocates seem to sympathize and empathize with a pregnant woman’s right to decide whether motherhood is just for herself and just for society. Human development is the premise for Pro-Life advocates.

Read More

Pathos On Abortion

353 Words | 2 Pages

Controversy surrounds almost every modern issue we face. One of the most controversial topics is abortion. Some believe that women should get the choice to abort their baby and others believe that abortion should be outlawed as they see it as a form of murder. In the article “Government had no role in my late-term abortion struggle. Let's keep it that way” by Brie Loskota, she discusses her perspective on abortion.

Read More

Abortion Rhetorical Analysis

1261 Words | 6 Pages

Abortion is not only a fluctuating concept in our society, but an ethical and emotional debate, as well. The image I have chosen presents concepts from a cultural and historical background, as well as presents an ethical, emotional, and logical appeal to the audience. The debate about abortion has simply been overblown and exhausted. The truth of the matter is, abortion is murder. Ending a life, whether innocent or guilty, is murder.

Read More

The Responsibility Of Abortion In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

1047 Words | 5 Pages

(67). Me, your child, your creation, is a burden that you have to bear and take responsibility for. To add further grievance to this burden, I have been designed with a countenance that is displeasing to the rest of humanity, and you must bear this as well. Addressing the opposing argument: “One perspective argues that abortion is a uniquely traumatic experience because it involves a human death experience, specifically, the intentional destruction of one’s unborn child and the witnessing of a violent death, as well as a violation of parental instinct and responsibility…” (Brenda Major

Read More

Is Abortion Morally Permissible

632 Words | 3 Pages

The debate whether abortion is morally permissible or not permissible is commonly discussed between the considerations of the status of a fetus and ones virtue theory. A widely recognized theory of pro-choice advocates can be thought to be that their ethical view is that fetus’s merely are not humans because they lack the right to life since they believe a fetus does not obtain any sort of mental functions or capability of feelings. Although this may be true in some cases it is not in all so explaining the wrongness of killing, between the common debates whether a fetus does or does not obtain human hood, should be illustrated in a way of a virtuous theory. The wrongness of killing is explained by what the person or fetus is deprived of, such as their right to life; not by means of a heart beat or function of one’s body, but by the fact that it takes their ability of potentially growing into a person to have the same human characteristics as we do.

Read More

More about Jonathan Glover Abortion

Related Topics

Open Document