ipl-logo

Judges Vs Federal Judges Essay

509 Words3 Pages

Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices

The process for electing a federal judge is both a simple, yet complicated one. A number of things take place between the need for a nominee and the appointment to a position. The basis for the nomination and appointment of federal judges and Supreme Court Justices is the Appointments Clause (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2) of the United States Constitution:

“The President...shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law....”

First a vacancy must be present at which time the President can make a nomination. Once the nomination is made, the Senate Judiciary Committee performs a background investigation with the FBI to review public record and professional credentials along with an investigation of the nominee’s private background to include financial affairs by the Justice Department. Next they hold a confirmation hearing in order to hear testimony about the nominee and for the members of the committee to ask any questions they may have. Once all the …show more content…

The confirmation hearings and process is significantly more public and invasive for someone being nominated to the Supreme Court. One of the main reasons is that the Justices of the Supreme Court will likely shape the way the Constitution is interpreted for 10-20 years after they are appointed. Like all other federal judges, they are appointed to their position for life terms. There have been 154 nominees and 120 appointments in the history of our country to the Supreme Court. The two most recent Justices were appointed by President Obama in 2009 (Sotomayor) and 2010

Show More
Related
1121 Words | 5 Pages

Supreme Court. On that same day, President Washington Sent a letter to congress, with the names of a chief and five justice associates and one of those associates was John Blair. The appointment came as a surprise to John Blair when he heard that he was an associate pick for the U.S. Supreme Court. But John Blair accepted it and resigned from the Virginia Supreme Court, to join the U.S. Supreme Court. Later Washington explained to Attorney General Edmund Randolph why he chose those people and said that the establishment of the New Supreme Court required “the selection of the fittest characters that would be able to expound law and the dispense of justice.”

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

Sonia Sotomayor was the first Latina Supreme Court Justice in U.S. history. She was nominated by president Barack Obama on May 26, 2009. Sotomayor is a women who got nominated by Barack Obama. She graduated from Yale Law School and passed the bar in 1980. She became a U.S. District Court Judge in 1992 and was elevated to the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 1998.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

In the year 1803, an ambivalent, undetermined principle lingered within the governing minds. The government and its “justified” Constitution were thought to be fully explained, until a notion occurred that would bring individuals to question the authority and their limit for empowerment. To end his days as president, John Adams named fifty-eight people from his political party to be federal judges, filing positions created by the Judiciary Act of 1800, under the frequently listed Organic Act. His secretary John Marshall delivered and sealed most of the commissions, however seventeen of them had not yet been delivered before Adams’s departure in 1801. On top of that, Thomas Jefferson refused to appoint those seventeen people because they were

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The quality of judges would without a doubt increase if they were appointed. However, I do not agree with the idea of judges being appointed. When looking at the partisan aspect you notice several possible issues with one issue being, is that individual the right person to do the job. Partisan election of judges allows for an individual that may not be as qualified for the job to be elected into the position. Nevertheless the partisan election of judges gives the voters what they want based on party affiliation along with qualifications.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

On March 3, Adams, in an attempt to prevent the incoming Democratic-Republican Congress and administration, appointed 16 Federalist circuit judges and 42 Federalist justices of the peace to offices created by the Judiciary Act of 1801. There

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

Upon the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a liberal justice, McConnell saw an opportunity to put in another conservative justice, even though it was closer to the election. This hypocrisy from the Republican party is a political move for them to gain more power across the government. The Constitution does not state the number of SCOTUS justices there can be. If the President wanted, he could nominate dozens of liberal justices and have most of the Senate confirm them so that their political party could be benefited. SCOTUS was never meant to be politicized, and if it continues to be, this will create massive swings on what the law is for our country.

Read More
1054 Words | 5 Pages

The candidate must give a speech to the people, proving his or her qualifications for the job, and then be voted into office by using the "majority rules" way of voting from the American

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

In addition to judicial selection methods, at the federal level, the president and senate get to appoint seats to judges, in which they will have for life. In my opinion, I think this selection method is good to some extent because I trust that the president and senate have good judgment when it comes to picking judges that will be independent, fair, and accountable. At the state level, electing judges varies from state to state. In

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court priorities from the time period of 1790 to 1865 were establishing the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was instrumental in founding the Federal Court System. The framers believed that establishing a National Judiciary was an urgent and important task. After the installation of Chief Justice John Marshall who “used his dominance to strengthen the court 's position and advance the policies he favored” (Baum 20). However, in the decision of the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803 was an example of the power he exuded “in which the Court struck down a Federal statute for the first time” (Baum 20). This created some internal conflict between Marshall and President Thomas Jefferson, however Marshall was able to diffuse this with

Read More
317 Words | 2 Pages

The Honorable Ramona Salvarez Devin Hardin P.3 1. Question: How is your role in government different from an elected official? Answer: My position is a federal circuit judge. My role isn 't different from an elected official since I was appointed by a democratic president.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

After the nomination process is finished, members must vote on the newly proposed candidates, which is done by ballet voting with a slate of all officers appearing on one ballet that each member is given. Once ballets are all in and counted by the committee than the new officer is appointed into office

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

The three levels within the federal courts are: the U.S. Magistrate Courts, the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court. The magistrate courts are the lowest level and as such are limited to trying misdemeanors, setting bail amounts and assisting the district courts. The U.S. District Courts are the federal branch of original jurisdiction courts. These are responsible for criminal trials and giving guilty or not guilty verdicts. The U.S. Courts of Appeals are responsible for all the appeals from U.S. district courts.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

“There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right. ”(Martin Luther King, Jr.) Most people were racist but now since the civil rights have been established most have stopped being racist and moved on. Three supreme court case decisions influenced the civil rights movements by letting more and more poeple know what the Supreme Court was doing to African Americans,and of the unfair him crow laws:(Dred Scott v. Sanford,Plessy v. Ferguson,Brown v. Board of Education). Dred Scott v. Sanford Is a case that most people felt that Dred Scott had an unfair charge against him.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

We enjoy our ability to exercise our rights in the voting booth. With that in mind, electing judges serves the will of the people and makes us feel as though we have a measured amount of control over the judicial system. This requires judicial candidates to expose their lives to public scrutiny and represent their voting pool. Conversely, appointed judges would have an easier time concealing truths about themselves that they would prefer the public not see. Favors among close circles of officials are likely easier to be traded in secret.

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

The book of Judges is one of the most profound stories in the Bible. The chapters in this book consists of so many interesting topics such as riddles, jokes, poems, and even some narrative history. The book of Judges was created for us to understand what exactly happened in a time where Israel needed God the most. Israel had fallen into utter despair and chaos. Then had lost touch with God and prayed for him to have mercy on them and to help them see the light once more.

Read More

More about Judges Vs Federal Judges Essay

Related Topics

Open Document