ipl-logo

Judicial Diversity Report

1003 Words5 Pages

This coursework will be discussing and comparing, the Report of the Advisory Panel on Judicial Diversity 2010, making reference to the role of the judiciary, their selection and training. The report argues about the diverse judiciary, how there is a strong case and a debate of how there should be an equality of opportunity for those who are suitable to apply.
The judiciary is the part of government who is accountable for the settlement of law, they examine lots of dissimilar cases where people are accused of breaking the law and making judgement on whether they have broken it or not. The role of the Judiciary also gives them the power to apply the law and interpret it as it stands. The Judges will have no bias for either sides of the case. It is important that judges are independent and neutral so they can defend the civil freedom from the executive and legislature powers. This can be achieved in the UK by a combination of statute, common law, the parliamentary rules, conventions, judicial and government restraint. The role of the Judiciary is to control the conduct of a trail, sole arbiter of legal issues, civil cases adopt the result, criminal cases sum up to the Jury and pass …show more content…

Some people believe that judiciary is not for them because of some misconceptions; like the you need to be part of the club, isolation from the under-represented groups, the circuit system and the High court which is currently a fundamental part of the organisation of the courts, flexible working. Judicial terms and conditions reflect the needs of a modern diverse judiciary. The return to practice where it talks about having no change to the current policy. The judicial conduct and discipline can be found in the Judicial Conduct

Show More
Related

What Is R V Lopez Case Brief

1757 Words | 8 Pages

Role of the Courts Firstly, the coroner’s court investigated the deaths of the accused’s family. The case was then heard in the local court. Due to the fact that the case was an indictable offence, the local court could not finalise the verdict. Therefore, the local court conducted a committal hearing, where the magistrate was to determine whether the prosecution evidence is capable of satisfying a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused committed the offence.

Read More

Judicial Appointments: Checks And Balances In Practice By Rachel Brand

96 Words | 1 Pages

The executive branch includes and is led by the President of the United States of America. Furthermore, this branch also includes the cabinet, executive, and independent agency departments. The President is able to veto the proposition of a new law and designate federal judges and federal posts. The President is also given the power to grant forgiveness to a crime that has been committed. As well as negotiate with foreign countries and treaties about situations and certain topics.

Read More

Racial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case

852 Words | 4 Pages

On the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Judicial Selection Methods

462 Words | 2 Pages

When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.

Read More

Florida Supreme Court Standing Committee On Fairness And Diversity

620 Words | 3 Pages

Public Trust in the Supreme Court 50 Hence, even the judges in courts can be biased to circumstances as well. In fact, the Florida Supreme Court Standing Committee on Fairness and Diversity (n.d.) contends that bias cannot be prohibited especially in the realm of politics.

Read More

Charles Le Brun Influence

491 Words | 2 Pages

by his predecessors. Murillo’s soft, sweet, and mischievous works offered a comic relief to the dark and stern artists’ works preceding him. Antione Watteau was famous for his ornate and airy style encouraged his individuality from other artists during his time. He mastered the technique of “trois-crayons” or the three chalks technique as seen in Seated Woman (1975). Antione Watteau influenced costume, film, poetry, and music in the art world during his time and after.

Read More

Summary Of The Buffalo Creek Disaster By Gerald M. Stern

1521 Words | 7 Pages

Our legal system allows judges to make important decisions on their own, which is a huge responsibility, and if it falls into the wrong hands, there could be severe

Read More

The Constrained Court

429 Words | 2 Pages

The Court’s effectiveness relies on the institutional capacities as well as the ruling’s popularity. When lower-court judges comply with Supreme Court decisions, rulings can have a substantial effect on social policies, as in the case

Read More

Why Do Judges Have Far Too Much Power In Making Laws

175 Words | 1 Pages

The claim “Judges have far too much power in making laws in this country” I believe, is not true & not accurate. I believe that in most cases it is necessary for judges to have power over certain laws made in this country for a number of reasons. There are many instances where courts need to make laws, as the government can’t always be responsible for making new laws, as they don’t have the time & need to focus on more important issues. Courts are also known as the centre for fairness, justice & the home of law across the country since they were introduced into society. Whether you are settling a dispute, fighting a parking fine or appearing on trial for murder, the place that you will end up in is one of the many courts across our country.

Read More

Supreme Court Justice Research Paper

517 Words | 3 Pages

1. The supreme court is the highest federal court in the United States. It consists of nine supreme court justices. Federal judges are nominated by the president and approved by the senate. Once appointed the justices will serve on the supreme court for the rest of their lives, unless they are impeached.

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

The Canadian Judicial System

1155 Words | 5 Pages

Judges has various roles and2 duties in the constitutional democracy of Canada. They interpret the law, assess the evidence presented, and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all, judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. (Canadian Superior Courts Judges Association, n.d.). The Canadian Judiciary is an adversarial system of justice and the legal cases are challenged between opposing sides, which assures that evidences and legal disputes will be completely and forcefully presented.

Read More

Diversity In Criminal Justice

1577 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction Theoretical assumptions about diversity and contact theory inform the view that a more ethnically diverse criminal justice system will reveal a broader range of voices that can shape and influence policy and attitudinal changes for the better. The focal point of this essay is on the law enforcement branch of the criminal justice system. It makes the argument that diversity in the police force can help reduce levels of racial and ethnic bias as well as disproportionality to the extent that diversity is able to change or influence the occupational and institutional structures that create these disproportionalities. To make this claim, this essay will first show that there are indeed disproportionate outcomes in policing and attempt

Read More

Trial By Jury Advantages And Disadvantages

1472 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

Read More

Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Common Law System

1268 Words | 6 Pages

[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law

Read More

More about Judicial Diversity Report

Related Topics

Open Document