Likelyhood of Julius Caesar, one of Romes most feared leaders, and Abraham Lincoln, one of Americas greatest presidents having much in common, wasn't much I thought. With more research I realized they had more in common like, they both had statues erected in their honor, there empires say a civil war close to there rain there's more I became fascinated on. In 60 BC, Caesar, Crassus and Pompey formed a political alliance that dominated Roman politics for several years. Their attempts to amass power as Populares were opposed by the Optimates within Romes Senate, among them Cato the Younger with the frequent support of Cicero.
The assassination of Julius Caesar differed from Abraham Lincoln in many ways some of which were the motives of the assassinators. The motive of Abraham Lincoln’s assassin was civil rights. John Wilkes Booth was a white supremacist and believed blacks people were not equal. Based on these motives Booth felt that it was right to kill the president.
People’s choices decide if history will view them as a martyr or a murder. Both Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are considered martyrs by history. As Lincoln had just won the Civil War and Caesar had just defeated Pompey, they were well liked at the time. But almost immediately after these events Brutus and J.W Booth subsequently killed them due to their belief that they were doing what was right for the nation and because they felt pressure from their past, therefore while some differences between Brutus and Booth are evident, the similarities are prominent.
He commanded the Senate to make himself dictator for life. Typically, dictators served for a short amount of time, but the Senate feared death if they did not follow through. Therefore, the Senate feared Caesar even more, thus making him a dangerous person and fearful dictator who controlled Rome. Last, in the years between 49 BCE to 44 BCE, Caesar made reforms and laws which made his power over the Senate even greater. Caesar ordered the Senate to make selfish reforms and laws.
Due the human nature, the pursuits of liberty, justice, and happiness have always been major concerns of humans throughout the history regardless of the way individuals connected and organized. Before phones or emails were even invented, the underprivileged individuals or groups congregated through “close ties”. In the recent years, individuals with “weak ties” adopt a different approach on similar activism with the help of various social media. Although these events are meant for similar intentions, their different communication methods induce an enormous distinction on their impacts, says Malcolm Gladwell in “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted”. He depicts that the movements by people bonding with “strong-ties”(Gladwell 405) tend to impact the society with substantial advancement through “high-risk activism”.
Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass were two very influential figures in American history, both with a shared dedication to the abolition of slavery. While Lincoln was a white politician and Douglass was a black former slave, they both recognized the moral and practical imperative of ending the institution of slavery in the United States. Lincoln is known for his role as President during the Civil War and the Emancipation Proclamation, while Douglass was a prominent abolitionist, orator, and writer. Despite their different backgrounds and paths, both men played significant roles in shaping the country's political and social landscape.
This election was almost as confused and complex as the 1796 election Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, both Republicans, tied in the Electoral vote because Republican electors failed to follow the prescription of ensuring that Jefferson would receive more votes (and the presidency) than Burr. Burr is accused of violating the agreement. This result threw the election to the House of Representatives for a final decision, an interesting situation given the fact that the House continued to be dominated by Federalists.
Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton are two of the Founding Fathers that were committed to a successful government. Although having some in common, they also had some incompatibilities. Thomas Jefferson was a privileged person growing up with many activities and jobs to do, while Alexander Hamilton grew up as a poor child and was an orphan, who made his way up to wealth and success. The conflicting idea of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton created the U.S government.
Both Franklin D. Roosevelt and Adolph Hitler were great alternatives during a time of crisis for both America and Germany. Common people were desperate for assistance, hope, and change. Roosevelt was the answer for America and Hitler for Germany, two men who ran for office offering real hope to the desperate that were jobless, homeless, and starving. Although both men are similar in ways they yielded starkly different outcomes of political challenges that left two starkly different legacies. Franklin D. Roosevelt, democrat, would win the 1932 Presidential election.
Coming from humble beginnings to being the head of state, Abraham Lincoln showed leadership in ways that many other presidents before and after him did not. Lincoln was a man of principle.(Barton) Lincoln won over the people by acting as their equal and leveling with them, getting on a personal scale with his people showing no superiority but treating them as if he was there equal. He showed many qualities to his fellow man that made him admirable. He was one of the first presidents to show sympathy for his fellow man no matter what the cause.
did I choose to compare these two men? Well, I already knew that Abraham Lincoln was the 16 th president of the United States. Using that knowledge I linked it with the fact that Julius Caesar was the dictator of Rome. They both were in charge but obviously approached their roles in two different ways as well. The more I researched on these two fellows, I distinguished the similarities and differences between them and thought they’d be perfect to compare.
This caused the Senate and other political members to start getting concerned that Julius Caesar was obtaining too much power. In consequence
He was always courageous and persistent in battle, which made many individuals admire him. Similarly, Julius Caesar was a leader of Ancient Rome. In the beginning of Caesar’s reign, he
Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln were similar in a lot of ways. Both were very famous political figures known for dealing with civil wars amongst their countries. They also both supported the common people and wanted to advance their countries to be more modern. Caesar updated the Roman Calendar and contributed to many reforms that helped the common people of his empire. Lincoln was a supporter of stopping the expansion of slavery which won him the popularity of the northern states.
Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.
