ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Conspirators Actions Essay

1473 Words6 Pages

In the greatness of ancient Rome, an evil act took place that destroyed the balance of power and changed the course of history. Even though some have praised Julius Caesar's assassination as a courageous attempt to protect the Republic, it is clear that it was a planned murderous act that called for legal consequences. Senators became irritated with Julius Caesar as he made changes and grew in power. On March 44 BCE, a group of conspirators assassinated Caesar within the Senate walls. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a determined act of violence that should be punished under the law, despite political motives and noble intentions. The conspirators' actions were against Roman law and justice, which was based on fairness and equity. Their …show more content…

The actions of the conspirators went against the essential principles of Roman law and justice, which were focused on the concepts of fairness and equity. The conspirators' actions were in direct violation of the Roman legal system, which aimed to ensure equal treatment and justice for all individuals within the empire. Throughout the 450-year republic, the Senate and the Roman people governed Rome, with the emperor acting as the primary ruler of the empire. Both the Roman legal and judicial systems and the conspirators' motives to defend the Roman Republic from Caesar's potential tyranny failed to justify what they did. Laws and justice were used to govern the Roman Republic, and the conspirators' actions broke these rules. ( Introduction to Ancient Rome, 2017) The conspirators' actions violated Roman law and justice rules, which emphasized fairness and equity. This violation contrasted with the essential principles of fairness and equity that the Roman legal system aimed to maintain, reinforcing the claim that they went against the core rules of Roman law and justice. Throughout the 450-year republic, the Senate and the Roman people governed Rome, with the emperor acting as the primary ruler of the empire. Both the Roman legal and judicial systems and the conspirators' motives to defend the Roman Republic from Caesar's potential tyranny failed to justify what they did. The …show more content…

The imperial system's dependence on powerful and secure leadership was harmed when the conspirators assassinated Caesar and replaced him with an unpopular emperor, setting in motion a chain of events that would ultimately contribute to the decline and collapse of the system. The emperor was the highest authority in the empire, and as such, his or her role and personality had a significant impact on the empire's stability and success. Weak or unimportant emperors frequently caused economic crises, huge barbarian invasions, and chaos. As a result, the Roman Empire's dependence on the emperor's status and character contributed to its decline and eventual collapse. This decline would not have happened if Caesar hadn't been killed. “The imperial system of the Roman Empire depended heavily on the personality and standing of the emperor himself.” (Introduction to Ancient Rome, 2017) The evidence supports the claim that the assassination of Julius Caesar and the shift in power to an unpopular emperor led to the decline and collapse of the imperial system. The emperor held the highest authority in the empire, and their role and personality played an essential role in maintaining stability and ensuring the success of the empire. Weaker or less significant emperors often resulted in economic crises, barbarian invasions, and overall chaos. Therefore, the Roman Empire's

Show More
Related
706 Words | 3 Pages

The two factors that most contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire were greatly impactful in Ancient History. Before the fall of the Empire, during the Pax Romana, Emperors ruled longer and most likely died of natural causes. During the decline, the reign was much shorter and they were most likely to be murdered. Thanks to Dioclectian’s reign, the New Empire was introduced, giving people more rights and protection. However, this resulted in great consequences as it became harder to govern and harder to manage.

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

As a Roman citizen, watching the decline of the Roman Empire was frightening because of the constant worry. The Roman Empire lost its power due to simultaneous external and internal factors such as the lack of political stability, deterioration of the military, and constant invasions from outsiders. The first internal factor that led to the fall of the Roman Empire was the lack of political stability. This was due to the constant change of emperors, causing haphazard leadership. “The soldiers in various parts of the empire proclaimed fifty emperors in about the same number of years” (Lines 8-10, Document 3a, Third Century Crisis of the Roman Empire).

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The fall of the Roman Empire, where every leader gets murdered along with the military. Rome was the most powerful empire in the ancient world until it fell. The three primary reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire are weakened military and invasions, too much territory to govern, and faulty leadership. One of the primary reasons why Rome fell was that it suffered from a weakened military and invasions.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

“A wealthy lawbreaker is not punished for his injustice. The laws and constitution of Romans were not fair.” (Fall of Rome, Doc E) The governors were harming the people. In fact, there was a civil war going on between the people for the emperor's position.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

However, it is important to note that the rule of Romulus Augustus

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

As the empire grew the government became very unstable and people started to fight for power. As seen in document A, over a 50 year time period the empire had 22 different emperors. The constant change of power caused the empire to become very unstable and also led to the citizens not trusting the government, instead they started trusting the various military generals. The military generals would then try to

Read More
1162 Words | 5 Pages

The Roman Empire: The Survival From Republic to Empire. Fiona Reilley World History Apr 18, 2024. In times of empires, one of the most important and difficult things for a major power to do was to build a strong government that could hold authority over the people. A strong government must please the people and keep the empire running smoothly.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Did Julius Caesar destroy the Roman Republic? By Zoe Fewtrell Introduction: Gaius Julius Caesar is generally regarded as a controversial figure who is commonly held accountable for the collapse of the Roman Republic. This perspective is highly contested, as Caesar instituted numerous substantial and long-lasting reforms that benefited Rome, yet these reforms were frequently perceived as “politically dishonest” and “power-hungry” behind his actions and ambitions, calling his legacy into question. While some view him as a significant reformer, others perceive him as an irredeemable dictator whose actions triggered the Republic's collapse. His complex legacy continues to be contested in our modern-day world by historians and individuals, globally.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

Caesar's actions were blamed for the diminishing of the Republic as they significantly altered the political situation of Rome and did not abide by the institutions. Caesars centralised power and inability to abide by these institutions was unseen before, and was deemed disrespectful for republican

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

The Fall of the Roman Empire Michael C. Pinto World History Mr. Rodio 29 October 2015 Michael C. Pinto 1 Mr. Rodio World History 29 October 2015 The Fall of the Roman Empire The Roman Empire was one of the largest empires in the world and spanned over fifty-four countries.

Read More
89 Words | 1 Pages

It was very corruptible for a time, due to the fact that none of the laws were written and most citizens (mostly the lower classes) didn’t even know their own laws properly (up until the 12 tables were inscribed) so there was a lot of misinterpretation and bias, and there would have been some roman citizens committing small crimes unknowingly. Sentences could have been swayed to be in ones favour, or be biased towards the accused because their legal system wasn’t clear enough and was therefore taken advantage of.

Read More
164 Words | 1 Pages

During the Roman Republic, justice was a fundamental aspect of Roman culture. The Romans believed that justice was essential for maintaining order and stability within society. One of the primary ways in which justice shone was in Rome's legal system. The Roman legal system was highly structured and included many laws and regulations that governed every aspect of Roman life. A series of magistrates responsible for enforcing the law and ensuring justice oversaw the legal system.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

The Fall of the Roman Empire is one of the most memorable setbacks of one of the greatest civilizations to ever exist. Many theories have been said as to the cause of the empire’s fall but, even today, there are still unanswered discussions on what the specific factors were. There are numerous of factors that contributed to the empire’s fall such as the effectiveness of their army, the health of its citizens, the strength of the economy, the capability of the successors, the continuous battle for power, religion and the regulation of their administration. The Fall of Rome was started with the decline in Western Roman Empire where the emperors failed to maintain their rule. The lost of power of the West let alone East was a great threat to the empire but the theme of the decline has been discussed and changed through a much bigger time frame from year 376.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

The Roman Republic was a major political and economic achievement in human history, lasting more than 500 years and achieving many major political and military successes. However, the republic did not last long and lost many of its achievements as a result of the transition to imperial power. Many factors contributed to this, corruption perhaps being the most important. Corruption was one of the main factors causing the decline of the Roman Republic, affecting all aspects of political and economic life. Corruption included bribery, forgery, secret influence, and violation of rights and property, “The poor and veterans of Rome were discontent with how the Roman Senate dealt with the Republic.

Read More
1663 Words | 7 Pages

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely.” This is a quote from Lord Acton and is a perfect example of what happened to a young fourteen year old boy known as Heliogabalus or Elagabalus, who owned the title of Roman Emperor. To this day, Emperor Heliogabalus is known to be one of the most unusual characters to ever sit on the Roman throne. Emperor Heliogabalus abused his power by disrespecting the Roman Culture and doing whatever he wanted, which caused him to become hated by a large group of people who ultimately killed him.

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Conspirators Actions Essay

Related Topics

Open Document