Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most successful and outstanding leaders. The question of whether or not he deserved to die is very simple. No, Julius Caesar did not deserve to be assassinated for the good of Rome because he was the good of Rome. Politically, militaristically, and economically he benefited Rome. Did the conspirators kill Caesar for the good of Rome or for their own personal motives?
Julius Caesar Julius Caesar was a very good leader, he did so much for Ancient Rome. He was one of the greatest leaders of all time There were so many things that happened after the death of him that changed Rome, he was part of the first Triumvirate, and changed the Roman Government. These are the reasons why he was the greatest of Rome. First of all, what happened after his death was the most horrifying death that has ever happened.
But his rule would be brief. A few years later Caesar was founded murder. The Senators kill Julius Caesar because they was tired of him and all his power, they thought that Caesar had too much power and that all the power would go to his head and destroy Rome. Augustus, was Julius Caesar’s
As he led his men, “He also moved fast to strengthen the northern borders of the empire and tackle its enemies in the east” (PBS, Public Broadcasting Service). As a result, Rome was out of harm's’ reach for the next 2 years. To put an end to his successful reign, Caesar was brutally murdered by 23 men, one of which he considered his closest friend. And for doing what? By simply protecting the empire that he helped raise and prosper.
There is a possibility that Caesar could turn out to be one of the best leaders Rome has ever seen especially with how he leads his armies. Also Rome would never be the empire it is right now in the story without Caesar being such a great leader this entire time. Caesar has also not shown any signs of being crazy of having or wanting power. He has denied the crown several times and hasn't gone crazy has a high power general. One last reason Brutus should not join the conspiracy is Brutus could still be in high power under Caesar.
Consequently, Antony develops an inductive argument to prove the two propositions he established through juxtaposition; however, Antony’s argument is fallible as he relies on insufficient examples. Through the lens of the third intellect, taking a mere four examples in Caesar’s entire life to prove that he is unambitious is a fallacious line of reasoning. While the first example is sufficient, as it claims that Caesar was “faithful and just” for the duration of Antony and Caesar’s friendship, the other three examples are each one specific instance in the wide swath of Caesar’s life. From filling the “general coffers” with “ransoms” he brought home from war to weeping when the “poors have cried”, to rejecting the crown “on the Lupercal”. To prove that Caesar was not an ambitious man, these examples are far too specific, and their numbers are inadequate.
The Death of Julius Caesar: Not Justified. Although Julius Caesar had started to become very powerful and could have done whatever he chose to, he did not deserve to die. Julius Caesar was a Roman general and politician; he named himself dictator of the Roman Empire. According to (Julius Caesar) ‘Throughout his eight-year governorship, he increased his military power and, more importantly, acquired plunder from Gaul.’
Do you regularly want to have a peaceful world where there no fights going on or wars happened between your own country? Well this shall not happen anytime soon with the condition as Caesar still lives! Caesar must die as a result of destroying the republic of Rome, remaining two by disrespectful to others, and most importantly was always causing trouble. CAESAR MUST DIE! Caesar must die because he is destroying the roman republic.
Should Caesar have been assassinated? The people of Rome liked him and chose him as dictator and the only reason it happened was because the senate thought he wanted to be king when he was barely a dictator. Think about it if the people of Rome chose he isn't he more like a president. Therefore the assassination of Caesar was not justified for these and the other reasons that he was compassionate, helpful, and grew Rome.
He killed caesar for the better of his country and not for the better of himself. He has respect and was a honerable
This should not have happened to Julius Caesar after all he did for Rome and its
When many hear of the author Edgar Allan Poe, they instantly start thinking about the famous poetry writer, who mostly wrote about American Gothic. In each of Poe’s stories, there are always specific techniques that he uses to create a sort of “Poe exclusive” tale. While Poe was growing up, he didn’t have such an easy life, but his stories allowed him to showcase his many different techniques and styles. Edgar Allan Poe was born in Boston, Massachusetts, on January 19th, in the year of 1809. Even though he was born in Boston, he grew up in Baltimore, which was where his father was born.
Caesar should live. Consider what would happen if he did not. There would be Chaos in the streets. Do not kill Caesar. The republic could fall.
Senators, We are gathered here today to discuss a exceedingly pressing matter. Men among us desire to kill Caesar. I strongly believe that Caesar should be spared because he is an intelligent leader, one who thinks for the people below him and a man who is not afraid to defy authority. First of all Julius is a leader who is able to make smart decisions for the good of everyone.
Caesar’s father had achieved an average position in politics due to which the family was allowed certain traditional entitlements and offices. Caesar
