ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

685 Words3 Pages

Julius Caesar Lit Essay

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play by Shakspeare, there is a king who is ruled as a tyrant who does not care about his people, he is subjected to be killed, his death is not justified in the end. Specifically in Act lll, scene 2, Brutus is trying to convince the people of Rome that he is justified for killing Caesar, Mark Antony is there to change the people’s opinion and turn them against Brutus. Mark Antony attempts to convince his audience to go against Brutus by using apostrophe, antithesis, and rhetorical questions. One rhetorical device Mark Antony uses is antithesis to break down Brutus’ argument on why he killed Caesar. One piece of evidence is in Act lll, scene, ii, lines 31, Mark Antony says, “ Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;”. Here, Mark Antony is turning Brutus’ speech/claim against him. In using antithesis in the quote, Mark …show more content…

For example, in Act lll, scene ii, lines 31, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me”. When Mark Antony says this, the audience is more persuaded with his speech because of how intense his emotions are, they are more likely to feel sympathy for Antony and also feel a sadness growing in them because their to be crowned king is dead. In using the apostrophe in the quote, Mark Antony persuades the audience by the sympathy the audience begins to feel. The audience now sees how they have betrayedCaesar someone who was beloved by all of Rome, who was said to be selfish and was said to be the fall of Rome when really was looking out his his people; when Caesar's will was read he had left his belongings to the people for their lives to flourish when he is gone. Accordingly, Mark Antony shows apostrophe by showing how his heart still mourns the loss of Caesar, someone beloved and close to all of

Show More
Related

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

1498 Words | 6 Pages

Antony’s speech paints Brutus as a hypocrite, when, ironically, it is Antony who is the true deceiver. Throughout his speech, Antony

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

850 Words | 4 Pages

In Antony´s speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral, had a hidden, alternate motive. Antony uses rhetoric all throughout his speech, the rhetoric being used are pathos, ethos, and logos. He uses pathos when he is addressing the crowd about how Caesar has compassion for all the people in Rome. Antony also uses logos and ethos to undermine the conspirators. Antony is the speech giver and his target audience are those who admired, and adored Caesar.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

911 Words | 4 Pages

Antony, through the use rhetorical devices of diction and verbal irony, develops an argumentation in order to turn the Plebeians against the conspirators and persuade them to avenge Caesar. Specifically, Antony declares, “Have patience, gentle friends, I must not read it; / It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you. / You are not wood, you are not stone, but men; / And, being men, bearing the will of Caesar, / It will inflame you, it will make you mad: / ‘Tis good you know not that you are his heirs; / For, if you should, O, what would come of it!”

Read More

Ethos In Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

668 Words | 3 Pages

He does this in an almost sarcastic manner, in an attempt to persuade the crowd. “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, But here I am to speak what I do know.” (3.2.97-98). Antony states this to prove that he is to be trusted. He wants the crowd to think that they can trust his judgment on the assassination.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

691 Words | 3 Pages

At his funeral, Antony gives a speech in which addresses the mob siding with Brutus that is celebrating his death. In his speech, Antony uses a variety of appeals in order to convince the mob that Brutus should be held accountable for the death of Caesar. Antony’s

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

833 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony uses rhetorical devices such as paralipsis, rhetorical questions, and verbal irony in his speech to the plebeians in order to plot them against the conspirators. During his speech to the plebians, Antony uses paralipsis in order to kindle curiosity and interest in the audience. Antony mentions to the plebians that he had Caesar’s will with him but tells them, “Have patience, gentle friends, I must not read it; It is not meet you know how much Caesar loved you” (3.2.152-153). By drawing attention to Caesar’s will, something Antony desperately wants to show the plebeians, but then dismissing the idea of reading it, Antony uses a type of verbal irony called paralipsis. Antony is aware that the contents

Read More

Connotation In Julius Caesar

240 Words | 1 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s tragic play “Julius Caesar,” Mark Anthony remarkably masters oratorical manipulation through employing anaphora and connotative diction to foster dissent amongst the Romans. As Anthony reminisces on Caesar’s valiant actions, he empathetically repeats that the conspirators are “honorable men” while subtly insinuating that they are the “traitors [and] villains” who killed Caesar (3.2.137, 103, 108). Unable to speak ill of Brutus, Mark Anthony utilizes ambiguous connotations to disguise his true intention of avenging Caesar. Moreover, the anaphoric repetition’s variance in diction emphasizes Brutus’ reputation becoming increasingly deceitful and nearly comical, casting doubt on the true motives and credibility of the

Read More

Pathos In Julius Caesar

663 Words | 3 Pages

The play by shakespeare called julius caesar was about the story of julius caesar. The story of Julius caesar was that he was stabbed to death by the whole senate. At one part in the play two people named Mark Antony and Brutus started to argue and try to persuade the people in some way by using different rhetorical techniques. Brutus used pathos to persuade the people that he chose right and he was still honorable and caesar deserved to die, but brutus mourned for his death just like the people. Antony used a logos and pathos technique to persuade the people that brutus was bad and that julius did nothing wrong, by using examples Antony made a valid point.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

506 Words | 3 Pages

In the Shakespeare play, “Julius Caesar” many types of rhetorical devices are used by numerous characters to persuade the audience. Marc Antony uses all these rhetorical devices to their fullest when talking to a crowd about the murder of Caesar and how these conspirators should be held accountable. The devices that Antony effortlessly crafts into his argument are irony, in the first half of his speech, and the props he uses, in the second half of his speech. Marc Antony uses verbal irony to indirectly led the crowd to new conclusions about the conspirators.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

296 Words | 2 Pages

In Shakespeare's historical play, Julius Caesar, Antony devised this soliloquy subsequent to Caesar's assassination to divulge the tempestuous emotions he is experiencing to the audience. To express his feelings, Anthony pathologically uses the rhetorical devices of an apostrophe and a synecdoche. Primarily, Antony's usage of an apostrophe unveils his turbulent inclinations as he is alone with Caesar's post-mortal corpse. Anthony utters "O, pardon [him], thou bleeding piece of earth" for being "meek and gentle" to the "butchers" as he grieves over "the ruins of the noblest man" who is now dead (III i, 1-4).

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

1354 Words | 6 Pages

Antony brings awareness to the Plebians that "the noble Brutus hath told [them that] Caesar was ambitious" (Shakespeare 3.2. 77-78) to show that because Brutus is noble, then his word is accurate. Brutus claims that Caesar was ambitious, which means that Caesar was ambitious. As the speech progresses a few sentences, Antony reminds the Plebians of how honorable Brutus is and how Caesar had to die because of his ambition, but then speaks about the good things that Caesar has done. Antony starts to speak about how Caesar "hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill" (Shakespeare 3.2 88-89).

Read More

Essay On Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

704 Words | 3 Pages

This pulls on the pathos of the audience because the rhetorical question pulls on their conscience. Their conscience is questioning whether the murder of Caesar is justifiable, since he was not all the ambitious according to Antony. This allows for Antony to take advantage of the easily pliable minds in the audience and flip their introspections to vanquish the conspirators. Shakespeare uses the repetition of the word ambitious in Antony’s speech to instigate the plebeians, and fill their minds with enough doubts to get them to rebel against the conspirators. Talking about how Caesar refused the crown three times at the Luperical, Antony proclaims, “Which he did thrice refuse; was this ambition. /Yet

Read More

Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

978 Words | 4 Pages

Within Antony’s speech to the Romans he uses anaphoric text to spike a whirl of rage towards Brutus. Repeatedly Antony states “Brutus is an honorable man” emphatically for the duration of his speech to contradict Brutus’s nobility ( March Antony, Lines 83,88,95 ). Before Antony begins his speech he is approached by the Romans with comments to not speak bad on Brutus’s name, which is why he utilized the anaphora to repeat that Brutus is an honorable man therefore allowing him to gain the Romans trust to speak. Antony does not say these lines truthfully but sarcastically to make the people of Rome feel furious against Brutus for taking Caesar to his mortal death.

Read More

Examples Of Juxtaposition In Julius Caesar

592 Words | 3 Pages

In Act 3, Scene 2 of the tragedy of Julius Caesar written by Shakespeare, there are 2 very important speeches that shape the countrymen’s view on the death of Caesar. Marcus Brutus gives the first speech in an attempt to justify the murder he and his fellow conspirators just committed and the second speech is given by Mark Antony to open the citizen’s eyes to just how dishonorable and heinous the crime these men committed was. Both men use many rhetorical strategies in their speeches such as syntax to create juxtaposition and word choice to highlight the similarities and differences between the audience and the speaker in order to create an effect of either superiority or relatability to the audience. Each speech was effective in persuading the people to agree with a certain view, however in the end Mark Antony gave the speech that won the crowd.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Related Topics

Open Document