ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

685 Words3 Pages

Julius Caesar Lit Essay

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play by Shakspeare, there is a king who is ruled as a tyrant who does not care about his people, he is subjected to be killed, his death is not justified in the end. Specifically in Act lll, scene 2, Brutus is trying to convince the people of Rome that he is justified for killing Caesar, Mark Antony is there to change the people’s opinion and turn them against Brutus. Mark Antony attempts to convince his audience to go against Brutus by using apostrophe, antithesis, and rhetorical questions. One rhetorical device Mark Antony uses is antithesis to break down Brutus’ argument on why he killed Caesar. One piece of evidence is in Act lll, scene, ii, lines 31, Mark Antony says, “ Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious;”. Here, Mark Antony is turning Brutus’ speech/claim against him. In using antithesis in the quote, Mark …show more content…

For example, in Act lll, scene ii, lines 31, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me”. When Mark Antony says this, the audience is more persuaded with his speech because of how intense his emotions are, they are more likely to feel sympathy for Antony and also feel a sadness growing in them because their to be crowned king is dead. In using the apostrophe in the quote, Mark Antony persuades the audience by the sympathy the audience begins to feel. The audience now sees how they have betrayedCaesar someone who was beloved by all of Rome, who was said to be selfish and was said to be the fall of Rome when really was looking out his his people; when Caesar's will was read he had left his belongings to the people for their lives to flourish when he is gone. Accordingly, Mark Antony shows apostrophe by showing how his heart still mourns the loss of Caesar, someone beloved and close to all of

Show More
Related

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

1498 Words | 6 Pages

Brutus has a hero complex; this is his Achilles heel. The way he justifies his actions makes it sound like he is taking credit for the great deed of murder. Antony uncovers this and uses it to expose Brutus’s hypocrisy. Ethos, logos, and pathos add substantial potency to Antony’s persuasiveness. No matter the motive, the crowd was bound to see the flaws of Brutus’s defense.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

978 Words | 4 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

807 Words | 4 Pages

No matter what the circumstances, people always look for someone to blame. When Caesar was murdered the Plebeians needed someone to blame for what happened. Despite Brutus’s honor and respect among the Romans, Antony gave the more convincing speech at Caesar’s funeral by having an emotional impact on the Romans, therefore convincing them that an injustice had been done. Brutus first spoke at Caesar’s funeral with the goal of justifying his actions to the plebeians. Out of the three rhetorical appeals Brutus used Logos the least.

Read More

Ethos In Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

668 Words | 3 Pages

Antony entrances the crowd by utilizing pathos in his speech. He uses this strategy when he speaks about how he was great friends with Caesar and it causes him great sorrow to see him gone. “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar…” (3.2.103). By noting that Antony’s heart is with Caesar, he evokes a sense of sadness within the audience.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

691 Words | 3 Pages

At his funeral, Antony gives a speech in which addresses the mob siding with Brutus that is celebrating his death. In his speech, Antony uses a variety of appeals in order to convince the mob that Brutus should be held accountable for the death of Caesar. Antony’s

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

984 Words | 4 Pages

While he is closing out with his speech, Antony shows the body of Caesar while saying “my heart is in the coffin there with Caesar”, in turn creating a very emotional feel by showing Caesar’s bloody body (Shakespeare, III, ii, 108). The way Mark Antony executed this device is similar to how fundraisers show pictures of victims to get the audience to care, rather than just showing statistics about poverty. With his final line, he creates a dramatic effect by forcing the audience to pause and reflect with him. He was able to have control over the crowd by commenting that “[he] must pause till it come back to [him]” in order to direct the audience (Shakespeare, III, ii, 109). Both of these devices form a sensational feeling on the listening audience to change the way they have been thinking about the situation by planting thoughts into their heads and merely connecting the dots for

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

833 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony uses rhetorical devices such as paralipsis, rhetorical questions, and verbal irony in his speech to the plebeians in order to plot them against the conspirators. During his speech to the plebians, Antony uses paralipsis in order to kindle curiosity and interest in the audience. Antony mentions to the plebians that he had Caesar’s will with him but tells them, “Have patience, gentle friends, I must not read it; It is not meet you know how much Caesar loved you” (3.2.152-153). By drawing attention to Caesar’s will, something Antony desperately wants to show the plebeians, but then dismissing the idea of reading it, Antony uses a type of verbal irony called paralipsis. Antony is aware that the contents

Read More

Connotation In Julius Caesar

240 Words | 1 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s tragic play “Julius Caesar,” Mark Anthony remarkably masters oratorical manipulation through employing anaphora and connotative diction to foster dissent amongst the Romans. As Anthony reminisces on Caesar’s valiant actions, he empathetically repeats that the conspirators are “honorable men” while subtly insinuating that they are the “traitors [and] villains” who killed Caesar (3.2.137, 103, 108). Unable to speak ill of Brutus, Mark Anthony utilizes ambiguous connotations to disguise his true intention of avenging Caesar. Moreover, the anaphoric repetition’s variance in diction emphasizes Brutus’ reputation becoming increasingly deceitful and nearly comical, casting doubt on the true motives and credibility of the

Read More

Pathos In Julius Caesar

663 Words | 3 Pages

The play by shakespeare called julius caesar was about the story of julius caesar. The story of Julius caesar was that he was stabbed to death by the whole senate. At one part in the play two people named Mark Antony and Brutus started to argue and try to persuade the people in some way by using different rhetorical techniques. Brutus used pathos to persuade the people that he chose right and he was still honorable and caesar deserved to die, but brutus mourned for his death just like the people. Antony used a logos and pathos technique to persuade the people that brutus was bad and that julius did nothing wrong, by using examples Antony made a valid point.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

506 Words | 3 Pages

In the Shakespeare play, “Julius Caesar” many types of rhetorical devices are used by numerous characters to persuade the audience. Marc Antony uses all these rhetorical devices to their fullest when talking to a crowd about the murder of Caesar and how these conspirators should be held accountable. The devices that Antony effortlessly crafts into his argument are irony, in the first half of his speech, and the props he uses, in the second half of his speech. Marc Antony uses verbal irony to indirectly led the crowd to new conclusions about the conspirators.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

872 Words | 4 Pages

In Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, Mark Antony delivers a brilliant rhetorical address which destroys the pillars of logic in Brutus’ speech that rationalizes Caesar’s murder. Antony weaves the argument that Caesar was unjustly slain by ruining Brutus’ honor and disproving the claim that Caesar is ambitious. While Antony skillfully and successfully convinces the public of Caesar’s innocence, causing them to riot against Brutus and the conspirators, the reasoning in his address is flawed. Inadequately utilizing a key aspect of the first act of the intellect, he develops illogical definitions to describe the central words in his argument. Furthermore, using a division of the third act of the intellect, he constructs an inductive argument relying

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

296 Words | 2 Pages

In Shakespeare's historical play, Julius Caesar, Antony devised this soliloquy subsequent to Caesar's assassination to divulge the tempestuous emotions he is experiencing to the audience. To express his feelings, Anthony pathologically uses the rhetorical devices of an apostrophe and a synecdoche. Primarily, Antony's usage of an apostrophe unveils his turbulent inclinations as he is alone with Caesar's post-mortal corpse. Anthony utters "O, pardon [him], thou bleeding piece of earth" for being "meek and gentle" to the "butchers" as he grieves over "the ruins of the noblest man" who is now dead (III i, 1-4).

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

1354 Words | 6 Pages

Antony brings awareness to the Plebians that "the noble Brutus hath told [them that] Caesar was ambitious" (Shakespeare 3.2. 77-78) to show that because Brutus is noble, then his word is accurate. Brutus claims that Caesar was ambitious, which means that Caesar was ambitious. As the speech progresses a few sentences, Antony reminds the Plebians of how honorable Brutus is and how Caesar had to die because of his ambition, but then speaks about the good things that Caesar has done. Antony starts to speak about how Caesar "hath brought many captives home to Rome whose ransoms did the general coffers fill" (Shakespeare 3.2 88-89).

Read More

Essay On Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

704 Words | 3 Pages

This pulls on the pathos of the audience because the rhetorical question pulls on their conscience. Their conscience is questioning whether the murder of Caesar is justifiable, since he was not all the ambitious according to Antony. This allows for Antony to take advantage of the easily pliable minds in the audience and flip their introspections to vanquish the conspirators. Shakespeare uses the repetition of the word ambitious in Antony’s speech to instigate the plebeians, and fill their minds with enough doubts to get them to rebel against the conspirators. Talking about how Caesar refused the crown three times at the Luperical, Antony proclaims, “Which he did thrice refuse; was this ambition. /Yet

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Related Topics

Open Document