After examining our responses to the case of Stanley “Tookie” Williams, it is evident that we displayed contrasting views on whether or not Williams’ should have received the death penalty. In your response, you state that “Williams’s sentence should have been changed to life in prison,” whereas I argue “his sentence should not be commuted to life in prison.” It is my belief that Williams’ deserved the death penalty due to the fact that he “didn’t show any sign of remorse” for murdering “four innocent people.” On the subject of executing Williams’, you referred to “execution as freeing someone from suffering, guilt and sins they have committed.” In contrast, you maintain his sentence “should have been changed to life in prison” so
"The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the rights of every individual to claim the protection of the law, whenever he receives an injury,” said Chief Justice John Marshall. The laws during this time did not protect Crispin. Some would agree that Crispin should have killed John Aycliffe. and some would disagree. Crispin should have killed John for three reasons, because young Crispin was in danger, cruel John was trying to attack him, and Crispin could save his friend Bear.
However I did not agree with some of the sentiments of many people where they wanted to completely destroy the man who hunted Cecil. What he did was wrong, there was no question about t. He was wrong on all fronts, legally and also morally. However attacking him, or the absurd suggestions some were making will not bring back Cecil, so rather donating to charities that make an active effort in stopping these situations from happening is far more productive 2. What is the relationship between nature and “natural”?
Is it justifiable to kill in order to get revenge and peace? The death of Matt and Ruth’s son, Frank altered their lives. Losing their son put them in a dark place taking an enormous toll over their profound emotions. The hatred for Richard Strout, grew stronger daily. The story “Killings” Author Andre Dubus displayed disputes with the values of compassion, courage, and fairness.
Some people in this world seem as though they do virtually nothing wrong and end up nagged, fined, and jailed by the courts no matter what they do. Others, like would-be bank robber Edward Dempsey, 54, of Jersey City, can seemingly attempt to rob a bank and not end up behind bars, as NJ (dot com) has revealed today. Prosecutors have not collated enough evidence to prove that a robbery charge is warranted in this case. The blundering Hoboken man is said to have tried to rob the Investors Bank on River Street after the money was already locked away for the day at 6:45 p.m. The wording of the letter was what NJ called simply, "too nice" to jail him in this strange criminal case.
¨In matters of truth or justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same¨-Albert Einstein. The justice system, however, is imbibed with many problems. We can, however, try to lessen these problems with achieving justice as we identified some faults of in achieving justice of all and the justice system. One problem with achieving justice is people are sometimes guilty until proven innocent like when Charlie was immediately thought of as guilty without a chance to prove his innocence. Another problem imbibed in our justice system is innocent people as sometimes convicted like Michael Morton.
Some People Deserve Other Consequences Imagine if an individual is visiting a home and they along with everybody else are right next to death's door the whole time because there was a secret killer and Agatha Christie’s book And Then There Were None goes over this topic. 10 people arrive at the island on a boat, not knowing who everyone is. They slowly start dying, one by one.
As a species, humans can be vengeful and spiteful. Especially when it comes down to the justice and injustice when a wrong has been committed. For instance, on August 5, 2008, Casey Anthony was formerly charged with child neglect and slaughter of her baby. This caused quite the stir up among people who felt Ms. Anthony’s baby will not receive the justice that she deserves due to the fact there was no concrete evidence. Many believed that Casey should receive the death penalty to make up for the loss of her baby’s life because various people thought Casey was the one who allegedly killed her own child.
With all of these rewards, with the legacy he built during his time in college, it was all stripped away and forgotten because of one mistake Reggie made during college, accepting money from a fan for his spectacular performance at his school. In 2010, Bush would be investigated by the NCAA for breaking the rules of accepting things from fans, he would later become the first person in history to ever forfeit the Heisman trophy. Such a big award and he was forced to forfeit something he earned. Should a student athlete really be punished so harshly, if at all for such acts?
He contends that capital punishment violates human rights, does not deter crime effectively, and is often used as a tool of revenge rather than justice. "Walter's case taught me that the death penalty is not about whether people deserve to die for the crimes they commit. The real question of capital punishment in this country is, do we deserve to kill" (Stevenson 313). This quote challenges readers to consider the moral weight of such an irreversible act and reflect on our social responsibility and complicity in administering the ultimate punishment.
Our society is so busy deciding what is or is not just, that no one has taken a second to actually figure out how to define it. Justice is a result that is rightly deserved. It’s a consequence, and like all consequences, it can be good or bad. Justice gives and takes and yet no one can agree on what justice is. The ones who decide what justice means, are the people in power.
Every year hundreds of wild, exotic animals are killed, primarily in Africa, for money, bragging rights, and even decoration. Big game trophy hunting is a booming business, but has sparked a worldwide debate, especially after the killing of Cecil the Lion. Trophy hunters claim they are helping conservation efforts, but in reality, they are harming them. This sport is damaging the overall population of a species, especially lions, rhinos, and elephants. Also, the overall revenue from big game hunting is a small amount, and only a small percent of that goes to help the community.
The main theme of the book is that fairness and justice are two virtues that are extremely hard to find. The central question, “How can a virtuous person continue to believe in these morals and not get discouraged?” is portrayed by the central characters Atticus and Scout. The deeply ingrained prejudice, that people of color cannot hope to live up to those who are “high class and white ” is explored and exposed. Sexism and class warfare are other conflicts within the story line. People in Maycomb are discriminated against because of the color of their skin, their social class and their gender.
This was the first time taking this specific assessment. I was very excited and surprised in a good way by the results, they were very accurate in my case, I could not have expressed them better. My main top 5 themes are: Empathy, Learner, Achiever, Relator and Includer. The word Relator confused me at first, but after reading the Theme Description which says: "People who are especially talented in the Relator theme enjoy close relationships with others. They find deep satisfaction in working hard with friends to achieve a goal.
Even though it is true that taking the life of another is not right, it is even truer that the punishment should fit the crime. The death penalty is an exercise of justice that promotes retribution for crime and moral punishment for those who choose to take human life. Also, it prevents society 's worse offenders from re-offending, and it provides justice for the victims whose lives were cut short without a second thought. To better understand why capital punishment is a justifiable act, Kant 's theory gives a clear and logical understanding of the eye for an eye approach. Additionally the utilitarian view also explains why capital punishment is justifiable in regards to comfort for the victim 's family and prevention of re-offending.
