Children tend to do something mischievous and they can learn from their mistakes but commit a crime horrific such as murder and not face the consequences?Boxer John duane vanmeter,24, was fatally shot allergy by a 12 years old invader in front of John's girlfriend.The 12 year old was charged with capital murder but people are against the sentence due to the offender young age.The age makes one wonder if he understand what he has done and can being sentence adult is the correct thing to do.According to Elizabeth Chuck, in her 12 year-old spotlight justice system ill-equipped for juveniles article, she shares a 12 year-old charged with capital murder in texas for the death of a 24 year old boxer at his home.Juvenile should not be sentence …show more content…
In a rehabilitation space for tailored treatments per child to help them make decisions that would not throw their lives away.This shows an attorney who experienced a similar juvenile case strongly believes that kids can be taught to be a better person due to their age.The attorney does not want the young offender to throw their lives away over one choice they made. Working with them to find the cause of choosing to do the crime and deal with it to prevent any further crime than being sentenced as an adult . Child offenders are kids who act according to what is happening to them and can be taught to deal with it in the right manner. For a 12 year old to break into someone else's house and shoot someone, the child has to be treated to figure out what led him to shoot someone rather than be sentenced as an adult in prison. For a child to be punished as an adult will affect their developing brain influence to continue the life of crime or be a good