circumstances. What I see the most is the spirit Dietrichson explores from Kant. Known critics usually take Kant’s illustration as the particular duty because Kant in his major works on ethics, since Groundwork, gives specific examples of maxims and shows how they are to be tested in terms of the primary and secondary universalizability criteria of the CI. Kant illustrates different types of empirical circumstances in the light of occasional vagueness and ambiguity of CI on this point. Dietrichson maintains that the emptiness charge upon Kant would be of biographical interest only. That is, not only during that late period of his life, Kant responded the disputes from Constant, but all along Kant had convinced and clearly intended to assert …show more content…
Those who reduce the principle of morality to physical sense are the epicureans, and their principle is that of self-=love, and rests upon the comfort and safety of our condition.
Those who assume a moral sense, whereby we are supposedly able, by feeling, to perceive the propriety or impropriety of our actions, have the principle of moral feeling. Shaftesbury introduced it, and had many Englishmen, including Hutcheson, as followers. The moral and the empirical senses are both internal empirical grounds. Those who assume extremal empirical grounds as the principle of morality, base it on examples of custom and education, through community with one another, men engender that which seems similar to a moral law (Kant’s letters on ethics.29:622).
Kant holds, then, that the subjective, empirical and internal serve as the foundations of moral feeling and also the basis for the principle of morality. However, after a short while, he realizes this psychological explanation of morality remains deficient. Consequently, he alters his views in order to essentially rule out obscurity and specifically the notion of the privacy of the indemonstrable concept of the good. Therefore, one year after the Prize Essay, Kant deals with the problems associated with subjectivism and his psychological approach to morality in his work entitled ‘bemerkungen zu den beobachtungen’ (Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and