ipl-logo

King Lear Character Development

1057 Words5 Pages

In this essay I want to show that in the first act of King Lear it was already hinted at some points of the development that the characters of King Lear and the Earl of Gloucester go through.

The character Lear shows signs that he is becoming mad while it begins to affect his life and those of the other characters in the play . In the beginning of the Play King Lear decides to divide his Kingdom into three parts and split it among his three daughters with the goal to prevent future conflicts and to rid him of the burden of ruling. However he decides that the Kingdom should be split according to how much his daughters love him and not by who is the best ruler “Which of you shall we say doth love us most, / that we our largest bounty may extend …show more content…

Edmund plots against his legitimate brother Edgar and wants to get what is his “Edmund the base/ Shall top the legitimate. I grow, I prosper:/ Now gods, stand up for bastards” (Shakespeare 1.2.20-23) Another thing that should make Gloucester suspicious towards Edmund is that he planned to send him away again “He hath been out nine years and away he shall again” Although Gloucester should be aware of the envy that Edmund feels towards his brother Edgar and the hatred that he might feel towards Gloucester himself he doesn’t see these feelings as a possibility and trusts Edmund when he presents the letter which he claims is from Edgar and in which he supposedly conspires against his own father. This is a foreshadowing about the physical blindness that shall befall Gloucester later in the Play, because he couldn’t tell which of his sons he could trust and because he was blind towards the greed and envy of Edmund. This decision, which Gloucester made because he is too trusting towards people, shaped the way that things developed for him further on in the play, which nearly drove him to suicide from which he could only be saved by Edgar.

These two characters show that their different character traits that are shown throughout the first act are a foreshadowing for later developments that concern their character and shape them towards the end. Lear as well as Gloucester gets saved by his child which they cast aside earlier in the play because of a fault in their character and which was the cause of their suffering in the first place over the course of the

Show More
Related
384 Words | 2 Pages

If Edmond is trying to turn the tables to his brother, I feel that Gloucester wouldn't fall for it due to his anger in Act 1 that was expressed. In this act, I noticed a detail about Kent that seems important to the stories plot. Through aspects of dialogue and actions, I feel

Read More
1302 Words | 6 Pages

François de la Rochefoucauld, a distinguished moralist famously said: “We get so much in the habit of wearing disguises before others that we finally appear disguised before ourselves”. When individuals conform to societal expectations and beliefs, they may lose touch with their individual humanity and have difficulty growing as a person. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, Gloucester and Lear are aging characters that try to pass on their power to their offspring. Both Gloucester and Lear make initial mistakes in assessing their children’s intentions and lead themselves into committing actions based on false perceptions.

Read More
1552 Words | 7 Pages

It is only during the 4th act that King Lear is able to realize the wrongs he has done and fully develop this whole ego and superego. His reunion with his daughter, who is the interest of his desires, makes Lear be able to identify with himself as more than King but also a father. Moreover fully developing his

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout William Shakespeare’s tragic play, King Lear, the goal of gaining control over the kingdom and boasting about one’s status drove the characters to deceive each other through the use of lies and manipulation. Right from the start, King Lear demanded that his daughter profess their love for him, causing Regan and Goneril to exaggerate their love all to flatter their father and gain the most of his land. When it was Cordelia’s turn, even though she spoke from her heart about how much her father means to her, her words did not praise her father enough as he insisted she revise her confession. Act 1 Scene 1 started the destruction of the Lear family as Regan and Goneril proved successful in gaining their father’s land by spreading lies

Read More
192 Words | 1 Pages

According to Shakespeare, blindness in this play reaches a meaning beyond the physical inability of the eye to see, but also is a mental flaw that affects multiple characters in the play. Gloucester suffered terrible consequences from this mental flaw. Ironically, Gloucester “stumbled” when he could physically see because although he could use his eyes, he couldn’t see the truth. When Gloucester loses his bodily capability to see, he comes to the realization that often times having something makes us spoiled and that our “defects prove our commodities.” Not having eyesight turned out to be advantageous for Gloucester and his relationship with Edgar.

Read More
198 Words | 1 Pages

This is the first time the audience sees how evil and vicious Edmund is and what his intentions are. If Gloucester had not treated his “bastard son” so badly, he might not have been evil. Since, Gloucester continuously showed Edmund that he preferred Edgar over him, Edmund grew up with such a bad attitude towards him which led him to his evil plot and

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, maybe Gloucester would have applied his bright mind to improve the life of civilians. However, Shakespeare never shows us Richard III out of a stressful situation. We always see him under the pressure of either emotions or hard situations, which makes it hard to make judgments about the true personality of Richard. After making the first step, evilness has started growing like a snowball in Gloucester, until it reached the bottom of the mountain, killing everything on its way. The moral story of the play is that the seed of evil might grow very fast, and cause a great damage to people who have irrigated it.

Read More
1336 Words | 6 Pages

Gloucester is an old man with both his heirs as traitors it is a heinous injustice that Edmund has done to his family. With the estrange, due to Edmund’s schemes, Edgar and a traitor

Read More
1474 Words | 6 Pages

This scene is vital for understanding the play’s exploration of the politics of the nobility and the interpersonal relationships of men. Our group considered Act 3 Scene 2 essential to the comprehension of the development of Prince Hal in relation to his father, King Henry IV. However, more context is needed to understand the pair’s progression throughout the play. In the opening scenes, both Henry and Hal establish their views of the

Read More
1961 Words | 8 Pages

Once he realizes his wrongdoing he calls out to the gods that they need to prosper Edgar and not Edmund. This is ironic because Gloucester realizes that he made a blind decision only when he is actually

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

Blindness is the main theme of the play. In act 4.1 there is a line essential for the entire play: “’Tis the time’s plague when madmen lead the blind.” (4.1.49) This is what Gloucester, the character who goes physically blind, says. King Lear undergoes a metaphorical blindness, which can be easily associated with his madness.

Read More
1955 Words | 8 Pages

Preema Hamid ENG 338 Professor Prescott March 29, 2018 King Lear’s Character Growth Shakespeare’s King Lear is a complex play that complicates morality with foolishness, as well as associates madness with wisdom. It is about political authority as much as it is about family dynamics. William Shakespeare, known for his clever wordplay, wrote this play so that King Lear 's wisest characters are depicted as making foolish decisions. Lear, the King of Britain, is an authoritative and important man.

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

However, instead of leading his father to the cliff he wishes to commit suicide off, Edgar tricks Gloucester into jumping off a small hill, he faints during the short descent but recovers to Edgar in yet another disguise. Now play the role of a gentleman, Edgar explains how a demon wished for Gloucester to jump and is miraculously saved, giving him a reason to live. Edgar’s loyalty and cunning save his father who had previously disowned his own son because of an unsubstantiated claim. Had Edgar been disloyal to his father and blamed him for his injustices Gloucester would have died instead of contributing to the rest of the plot. Being a character with great influence and wealth, Gloucester has the ability to affect change within the kingdom, if Edgar did not have the loyalty to family, especially the loyalty of

Read More
807 Words | 4 Pages

He wants to obtain indirect evidence of Claudius guilt by means of staging a play about fratricide which traps his uncle into betraying his guilt”. The very ambiguity of the Ghost leads Hamlet to test the Ghost’s reliability of and to find plausible evidence which supports his revenge by observing and analyzing Claudius’s attitudes and behaviors through the play which is elaborately shown in front of

Read More
1327 Words | 6 Pages

These metaphors refer to the blindness to the truth. Neither Lear nor Gloucester see the truth in the beginning of the play, but rather regard the truth as lie and vice versa. The constant reference to blindness in the play shows the importance of this flaw of the two characters. The fact that they are blind to the true characters of their children leads them to their tragic

Read More

More about King Lear Character Development

Related Topics

Open Document