Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Louis xvi role in french revolution
King louis xvi abosute monarchy free essay
King louis xvi abosute monarchy free essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Louis XIV was worshiped and admired by some people however he was far from being critical or balanced. Some of his decisions like prejudge or finding somebody guilty were based on the rumors and denunciations. Duc de Saint-Simon wrote, “Many a man in all ranks of life was ruined by these methods [rumors and denunciations], often very unjustly…” 2. What specific personality
He ruled by divine right theory which held that he had received his power to govern from god and was therefore responsible e to god alone (doc 1). During this time King Louis XVI became too powerful. King Louis XVI way of ruling is by divine right . Which led to a lot of despair in his country. One of the causes of the French Revolution is the unfair treatment of the third estate
He could declare war and make peace. In document 2 you can see that he raised the third’s estate’s income paid in taxes and total land owned. He was very unfair. The first and second estate didn’t have to pay taxes. The conditions were so bad.
Louis XIV of France, who dominated Europe with his strength and army, was the most successful absolute king. He had a different perspective on how to rule France. With this different mindset came big dreams from Louis that he was determined to achieve. France ruled Europe in a similar manner to how Spain ruled previously. It was eventually not long before France surpassed Spain in power, and in the end, France became the most powerful nation in Europe because of Louis's dedication to his ambitions.
The government was known to be corrupt and there was a major gap in wealth. While the monarchy and nobility were very well off, lower classes were taxed highly and starving, and the country was close to bankruptcy. The king, Louis XVI, was becoming extremely unpopular, due to his extravagant spending and lack of contact with the public. People were becoming more and more discontent with the way the country was being run – people wanted change.
Question 2: In the 17th and 18th centuries, the absolute monarchy was all the rage throughout the European continent; to consolidate and increase their power, various absolute monarchs shared a bunch of similar methods. First, most of the absolute monarchs tried to control every aspect of his/her people's life, including social, political, and economic aspects. For instance, Elizabeth I of England had decided the religion of the country, and claimed that no law could be passed without her consent; she also executed her own cousin, due to his disloyalty to her. Second, the Church often played a pivotal role within the societies of the time, because the absolute monarchs usually used religion as a tool to control the people.
The debt of King Louis XIV was very troublesome. It caused his once powerful and rich kingdom, to plummet. The article Memoir of the Reign of Louis XIV, by the Duke of Saint – Simon: Louis de Rouvry, states, “He wished to reign by himself. His jealousy on this point unceasingly became weakness . . . He liked nobody to be in any way superior to him.”
(Source D) The people also wrote to the king and ask that their rights are to never be taken away by the monarchy. The people also wanted to abolish indulgences and all other taxes from the church. The people then asked that the King must give everybody a fair trial, before throwing them in jail. (Source C) King Louis was an absolute monarch which means he had all the power.
Moliere was specific in mentioning King Louis’ power over the country to foreshadow his role in Tartuffe. Instead of appealing to the King to save the day in a believable fashion, Moliere creates a comical play to allow the audience to come to the realization themselves. People blindly follow the king, similarly to how Orgon and others blindly follow Tartuffe. King Louis XIV ruled the country for seventy-two years, during which time people grew to trust that he was doing what was best for the country, without ever knowing what he was doing.
Since Louis XIV inherited his monarchy at the mere age of five years old, his nation was run by Cardinal Mazarin until his death in 1642. After the cardinal’s death, Louis began to reform France through his absolute rule which is apparent in the words he uttered the day he came into power: “Messieurs, I have come to my Parliament to tell you that, following the law of the land, I intend to take over the government myself; and I hope with the goodness of God it will be with piety and justice” (Horne 107). Even when he just began to rule, Louis XIV had full intent to take over France absolutely for the betterment of the country. The main principle of his absolute monarchy was weakening his nobility so that they had little to no control over the state. This was quite simple when he forced his nobility to live in the Palace of Versailles, planning various parties and banquets in order to keep the nobles preoccupied so that he could truly rule France.
They wanted to have control over everything in the state. These leaders believed that God chose them to rule and that they only had to listen to Him. Rulers, like Louis XIV, controlled every aspect of his subjects life 's. In the same way, the Fredericks of Prussia and Peter the Great kept their country under control by forcing people to join the military. During the 1600 and 1700s this new type of leader, known as an absolute ruler, had similar beliefs and objectives to reform their country. Strengthening of their military, increasing taxes, and unifying religion were some of the many strategies an absolute ruler
Negative stereotypes are damaging because it fits minority groups in a box and deceives people that roles are predetermined and absolute. Negative stereotypes work in two ways. First, it works according to language. There are the words and phrases used to perpetuate negative stereotype, but then, as we can see in the museum’s collection, there is the infiltration of material culture, objects bought and sold, that further communicated anti-black slogans. In effect, what we can see by looking at these images is a mass economy dedicated to keeping alive a very dangerous myth.
Post Thirty Years war left France looking for a new leadership style that would give plenty of stability. What France received was Louis XIV, who would reign under the new absolute monarchy government. During Louis’ reign, divine rights controlled rank in society. This left many confused on why they were picked to be at the bottom of society, and why the king was given his power. Jean Domat, a royally appointed juror by king Louis helped explain a better understanding of the new system of governance to the people of France in his writings.
In 1789, France was precariously balanced on the edge of chaos. King Louis XVI was ruling monarch of France. King Louis’ youth depicted him as reckless, thoughtless, and unwise. A series of bad financial and political decisions, lead to his unpopularity among the people of France. King Louis was young, distracted and misguided.
King Louis XVI, who was the ruler at the time, was a main contributor to these problems that led France to its downfall. The country had a massive lack of resources and food, which led King Louis XVI to borrow more money than he could afford, thus putting the country in immense debt. Despite the very visible crisis overthrowing the country, the king was incapable of accepting his mistakes and refused to change his ways. He maintained the unjust voting system, known as the Estates-General, and worsened the taxing system in order to pay off his debts. The people, especially those of the Third Estate, were clearly angry and dissatisfied with the state of the country, which led them seek out a movement for what was right.