2.1 SPEECH ACTS There are many theories that facilitate the analysis of spoken language. Definitely, speech act is one of those theories which notice communicative purposes between speakers and listeners. This effective tool aids learners to identify and label the differences of communicative functions through utterances of interlocutors. According to the theory as pointed out by Adolphs (2008) that particular speech act can be illocutionary, the gist of an utterance that a speaker produces, and perlocutionary, the actual purpose of the saying which can be direct and indirect. For example, the question Are you with me? may be used to inquire the audience’s attentive or interrogate the problem in following the talk while I’m sorry can be replied to signal the need for restating the talk or employ as a spoken device for politeness. This contributes the unpredictable nature of conversation. The hardship is created from the varieties of speaker intentions and ideas, whereas conversation is relied on reciprocation both speaker and listener. Since the function does not attach the utterance itself but emerges from the speaker, it is impossible that an utterance possesses only one function and in turn most speech acts own various functions. According to the property aforementioned, it is worth employing the theory of speech acts in the study to explore the two target phrases. Throughout the whole context of each …show more content…
As the evidence of Burkart (1998) reveals that to be competent, learners need to gain several of aspects that are vital for target languages: linguistic, cultural, discourse, and strategic aspects. This may not guarantee that learners will be able to become as competent as native speakers, they can cultivate to use all skills to accommodate themselves as efficient as