New York City is constantly undergoing change effects that ultimately some effect on everyone. However, some changes have greater effects on specific group than others. As it turns out minority groups, blacks and Hispanics, are frequently targeted and and affected by the changes in the city especially when policing is involved. Discrimination and stereotyping is something minorities constantly go through on a daily basis. Assumptions and generalizations about their culture, personality, and education is based solely on the basis of their race/skin color. During the 1990s New York City faced problems of disorder that reforms and programs were being made and enforced the mayor. There were two mayors that took office during this decade, Mayor …show more content…
The “Law Enforcement” Model was a method used by police where the only responded to calls made about major crimes and the NYPD were not very involved in the community. After complaints of disorder in the the city the NYPD began implementing the Quality of life Approach into their systems, which involved tactics such as stop and frisk, zero tolerance, creation of new law, and increase of police presence on the street. Another reason for the taking this approach was because of the broken window theory, which stated low presence/repercussion from police to small crimes will lead to larger/violent crimes. However, a police presence in a high crime area will not stop crimes it will displace it to areas where police presence is …show more content…
For example, the creation of new laws is a tactic used, that allows law to be made when certain crimes/actions become a greater issue. However, this can be related back to the The Labeling Theory, which states that no action is naturally a crime until people in power declare it to be and make laws against it. During this time period laws were being made against prostitution and homelessness. However, the majority of the population involved in these crimes were blacks and Hispanics. Now let’s say, the demographic that were largely involved in these crimes were whites would laws still be made against it. Probably not, instead programs would be made to help individuals involved in the crime.
Another example is stop and frisk and how it mainly targets blacks. This tactic was meant to reduce the possession of guns and drugs; however, about 9 out of 10 people people that were stopped were found innocent and little over 50% of the people stopped were black. This shows that stop and frisk does not reduce the crime and target specific groups. Even if the stop and frisk did decrease crime rates an individual should never be stripped of their persona because of their