Justin is the registered nurse that has been given the handover for Kelly Malone’s postoperative care in the surgical unit. Kelly Malone is a 49 female patient who has had a septoplasty and a right ethmoidectomy. Justin is working with Kelly to identify Kelly’s needs in order for Kelly to be discharged from the hospital. Kelly’s postoperative observations were a temperature of 36.2 degrees celsius; heart rate of 68 beats per minute; respiratory rate of 18 breaths per minute, blood pressure of 111 systolic over 73 diastolic millimetres of mercury; oxygen saturation at 93 percent of room air and a self-rated pain score of two out of ten. Kelly has a history of ‘not being able to breathe well through her nose’ and a history of disturbed sleep.
I spent a long time talking to Tina about a third-party action, possible recovery and our contribution to that recovery. This happened as a result of a motor vehicle accident and has some pretty bad injuries. I think we are paying his wife for home health services. So I went over the fact we have no lien on the first $50,000.00 but our lien as of today is about $228,000.00 The claimant’s third-party attorney is calling and asking how much we have paid but they haven’t been asking for consent to any third-party.
Federal MP Anna Burke is asking the Senate committee to review hospitals ' food administration and medication, particularly their anaphylaxis management. On Sunday, Ms Burke called the Senate 's attention to review the hospitals ' anaphylaxis management in a bid to improve medical centers ' standards, particularly to make them fully equip in handling patients with high allergies on food and substances. Ms Burke 's call came after she heard the news about the tragic death of Louis Tate, a 13 year old boy who passed away in October at Frankston Hospital. His death was linked to the hospital 's food preparation. It is believed that the health institute served him a food that he was allergic to, although the staff were aware about his food
October 2nd, 2002 was the start of a long and horrific three weeks in the Washington DC Metropolitan Area. People were terrified to be in the area and everyone was on edge. What appeared to be random killings, turned out to be a well-organized series of senseless shootings that took the lives of ten innocent people. After days of people being scared to death and much confusion, investigators discovered that there were two suspects in the shootings; John Allen Muhammad and his teenage partner Lee Boyd Malvo and they were in a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan designed to terrorize people. This break in the case came when one of the suspects called the tip hotline and told them to look into a murder in Alabama, which lead to the case being
ICM met with Mrs. Lampfield at JFK to assist her with her transportation and health goals. Mrs. Lampfield was schedule for an appeals hearing regarding her logisticare bus pass on 11/28/2016, however she missed her scheduled hearing. Mrs Lampfield stated that she missed her appointment because her mail was sent to the wrong address. ICM suggested that Mrs. Lampfield call logisticare in an attempt to get a new hearing date. Mrs. Lampfield informed ICM that she did not want to call logisticare as she did feel confident that she would be able to get the problem resolved and that she would prefer if the ICM called for her.
Harel Tillinger In the case presented, Hopewell High School has a practice of saying a voluntary prayer before each football game in which the coaches may participate and these prayers take place on school grounds. A father of two football players on the team, sued the school district because his children do not participate in the team prayers and are ostracized for doing so. In the case of O’Connell v. Hopewell School District, New Jersey, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr delivers the opinion of the court.
Jonathan, I agree with you completely that the only oral contract she needs to honor is the one with the attorney. The oral contracts with Hermes and the builder fall under the statue of frauds and would not be legally enforceable. Suzy does have to honor her oral contract with the attorney because the attorney performs the service of investigating the title and records associated with the land within the one year limit and informs Suzy of the information that has been found about the land. The oral contract with the attorney would be legally enforceable.
J. “Tangible Personal Property “ shall mean all of Debtor 's clothing, jewelry,furnture, furnishing, household goods, motorized vehicles, sport & hobby equipment and objects of art, valued at purchase of more then $200.00, that can not be claimed by a third party. K. “Income”, “Funds”, “Distributions” shall mean transfers, payouts, capital, and/or releases to Debtor and or third party agent of Debtor. To include to Debtor 's business interests. L.
A strong piece of evidence against Mr. Bennett is that Mr. Bennett was a colleague of Mr. Adam’s and worked on many business deals with him. He still owed Mr. Adam’s $250,000 for one of these deals. Mr. Bennett would have to sell his home in order to pay off his debt.
In this case, she would have benefited from the hospital while the hospital received nothing had she not payed, thus this situation forms quasi-contract to ensure fairness. White 's portion of the contract is executory, as he has to send in the check to complete his end of the contract. E-Z could not force Adler to pay because he received his additional benefit due to negligence by E-Z mixing up the papers. Quasi- contracts can’t be applied in this kind of situation. Watson was
The case of Carter vs. Canada is one of triumph for Canadians to question their civil liberties and constitutional privileges to an extent that had not been experienced in the courts history. The decision to abandon the previous law restricting the practice of doctor assisted suicide was justified by the court in the context of those with severe illness as well as a mental disability, in which prohibits their overall wellness. In regards to Life, liberty and security, it comes to a progressive conclusion that both the Supreme Court of Canada and Tina Carter both unilaterally agree that Canadians who are suffering unbearably at the end of life should have the right to choose a dignified and peaceful death. To explicitly regard the constitutional legitimacy of physician-assisted suicide within the charter of rights general limitations, the law currently contradicts the charter.
The case assessment of Brianna Lopez begins with her birth on February 14, 2002 in a New Mexico hospital. After leaving the hospital, Brianna resided in Las Cruces, New Mexico with her unwed parents, Andrew “Andy” Walters, 21, and Stephanie Lopez, 19. There were also four other adults and one child, Andy and Stephanie’s 18 month old son, living in the home (State v. Walters, 2007). Among these adults was Brianna’s uncle, Steven Lopez. Shortly after her arrival home, Baby Brianna experienced extreme physical, verbal, and sexual abuse from her parents and uncle.
This means that after your bankruptcy wipe away all your other debts, you still have to pay student loan debt. To discharge student loan in bankruptcy one must show undue hardship on paying the debt, a standard that is very difficult
Ms. Alexandra Estrada is a 45 years old Hispanic female. She arrived at BHWS from HELP USA on 11/20/2013. She is currently living in the Department of Homeless Services System since 12/25/2012. Ms. Estrada stands 4”10’ inches tall and weighs approximately 100 lbs. She is of olive skinned complexion, has bleached dyed blond short hair, and has distinct scars on her forehead and left arm.
Moreover, while the bank was indirectly involved with the sons’ businesses knowing about the unstable finance situation they have taken unconscionable advantages by entering the transaction without any aware and advise with signing the guarantee and mortgage. In the case of proceeding, it is clearly showing that one of the parties entering the contract didn’t understand all the complications involved in the contract which brought disadvantages to them. A contract that is considered behaved unconscionably leads to the result of voidable by the plaintiffs, Mr and Mrs
