ipl-logo

Little Sisters Vs. Canadian Charter: Case Summary

689 Words3 Pages

Charter Case Analysis
Censorship: Little Sisters vs. Canada Little Sisters vs. Canada was a case that involved a bookstore in Vancouver that serves to mainly gay and lesbian clients. Little Sisters fought against the unfair, discriminatory treatment from Canada Customs. For years, Canada Customs had repeatedly confiscated books and magazines being shipped to Little Sisters from the United States because they deemed them “obscene”. The items were often seized, detained and then prohibited although they had previously been approved for shipment to either Little Sisters or other bookstores and many “obscene” pieces could be found in the Public Library. Little Sisters challenged Canada Customs on account of the unconstitutional discrimination they had been targeted with. Canada Customs had violated a fundamental freedom, a …show more content…

Officials had infringed upon the fundamental freedom in section 2 subsection 2(b), which concerns: the freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression. By confiscating specifically Little Sisters’ shipments of books and magazines, on the grounds of “obscenity”, Canada Customs halted and censored expression of gay and lesbian media. Additionally, Canada Customs was responsible for the infringement upon section 8 of The Charter, which pertains to the right of security against unreasonable search or seizure. Little Sisters’ shipments were repeatedly confiscated and detained, without just cause. Thirdly, Little Sisters’ right to equality under section 15 subsection 1 was violated because the discrimination they were subjected to was likely caused because of the fact that Little Sisters is run by and for the LGBT community. Items of the same genre, imported for and sold in bookstores presumably run by a heterosexual staff for a heterosexual clientele, do not face the same discrimination from officials at the

Show More
Related
793 Words | 4 Pages

Sacramento City Unified School District Board of Education v. Rachel Holland was a case her parents filed against the Sacramento school district on behalf of their daughter. They wanted her to be placed in a general education classroom for the entire day, but the school district disagreed with the parents because they said her disability was too advanced for her to benefit from it. Rachel was a young girl who had an intellectual disability. She had an IQ score of 44. Rachel attended school at the Shalom School, which was a private school.

Read More
392 Words | 2 Pages

Summary: Since Friday, a Mount Pearl woman fought against Canada Post’s operation where they intended to install super mailboxes on her property. Jo-Anne Lyver became upset when Canada Post workers began to work on her lawn without consent. When Lyver confronted the contractors for documents regarding their project, they could not provide any permissions to install the mailboxes on her property. Lyver has stated that she is happy to oblige to official documents permitting the use of her land, but with no proof she is declining the workers access to her land. She has also stated her intentions to negotiate with Canada Post regarding tax costs and coverage.

Read More
1526 Words | 7 Pages

The Persons Case, a Defining Moment for Canada. Madeleine Balfour History 111 Dr. Denis Dubord May 26, 2017 In 2015, the Prime Minister of Canada announced a gender balanced cabinet in which half of its members were women. However, it was not until the Emily Murphy and the Famous Five won the Persons Case, a mere 88 years ago, that women were legally considered people. In the mid to late 19th century, political, and public life was largely run by men at the provincial and municipal levels.

Read More
1052 Words | 5 Pages

In the case McCann v. The Ottawa Sun, 1993 CanLII 5507 (ON SC), the General Division of the Ontario Court was correct when stating the published words by The Ottawa Sun were insufficient to carry the Mayor of Pembroke’s action of defamation. At the same time, the columnist’s comments can be considered a humorous remark, which is a prove individuals in Canada have freedom of speech, which is the ability to communicate ideas without the interference of the state. To establish a cause of action for defamation, the plaintiff must prove: the statement published was defamatory, meaning the words bring the person’s reputation into hatred, contempt or ridicule; the words, in fact, referred to the plaintiff and finally, the words have been published, meaning somebody – other than the plaintiff – had access to the statement. In 1993, the Mayor of Pembroke, Terance McCann, claimed damages for libel against The Ottawa Sun

Read More
434 Words | 2 Pages

Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer) (2002) Plaintiff - Richard Sauvé Defendant - Attorney General of Canada, Chief Electoral Officer of Canada & the Solicitor General of Canada FACTS The Plaintiff: Richard Sauvé is a former member of the biker gang ‘Satan’s Choice’. In 1975, Sauvé was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison for the murder of an opposing gang member. In 1993, Sauvé started a long journey fighting an injustice that denied all inmates the right to vote.

Read More
60 Words | 1 Pages

One example of freedom of expression being contested in a court of law was the Pickering v. Board of Education case Where the U.S. Supreme Court held that in the absence of proof of the teacher knowingly or recklessly making false statements, the teacher had a right to speak on issues of public importance without being terminated from his position.

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

However contemporary Canada is not without its issues, as stated earlier. Even with these important lessons, and our written out charter that has the basic rights for humans, we still fail to support and provide these rights to many marginalised communities and

Read More
1629 Words | 7 Pages

I A. B. Cantwell v Connecticut (1940) D. Jesse Cantwell and his son going door to door in their neighborhood talking badly to people about the religion of catholicism which lead to two people becoming angry. This leads to the Cantwells being arrested for breaking a local ordinance that requires a permit for solicitation and also for encouraging an infraction of the peace E. Were the Cantwells first amendment free speech rights violated when they were religious views were suppressed and did they encourage an infraction of the peace or not. F.The court ruled that you could restrict general solicitation but you could not put limitation based on religion and that if you did so it would be trying to silence someone's views.

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

The guard talked in a nice way about Blackfoot and was kind to the mother, she can let them both enter Canada even though the mother refuses to be Canadian or American. The American guards show no remorse to the mother when being asked but when it comes to the Canadian guards, there was a humble and

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

Samuel Roth, a literary business owner, was convicted in a District Court on charges of violating the federal obscenity statute by advertising an erotic novella. Roth’s first conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. On a similar note, David Alberts, who ran a mail-order business in Los Angeles and, was charged for violating the California Penal Code after a complaint that he was selling obscene books. His conviction was also affirmed by an Appellate Department of the Superior Court of the State of California. Roth appealed to the Supreme Court on grounds that his obscene material was protected under the free speech provision of the First Amendment.

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

Erb 4 In conclusion Bill C-51 is a very controversial piece of legislation and infringes on some basic rights and freedoms that us as Canadian citizens deserve such as allocating more power to police services and security institutions, raises privacy

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

ANALYSIS Terminating Ms. Murphy, due to a banned book, violates the First Amendment and the Board overreached when punishing her for providing a book for off-

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

This supports the author’s view that the government shouldn’t censor books, by doing this they are warping our minds into believing certain books are bad. The government should allow their people to decide how they feel about books, instead of just censoring

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

Before the Charter, many people may argue that Canada was a free and democratic country. Canadians had the freedom of expression, equality and the principles of fundamental justice. What changed with the creation of the Charter was that rights and freedoms were given constitutional status, and judges were given the power to strike down laws that infringed on them. In 1982, most Canadians agreed that the introduction of the Charter was going to monumental. But on the contrary, over 30 years later, numerous laws have been struck down by interpretation of the charter and remedial techniques that have been developed by courts.

Read More
1639 Words | 7 Pages

These tariffs and taxes impinge on rights of self-determination and freedom as suggested by The UN Universal Declaration on Human Rights and the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights respectively (Levin Institue, n.d. Human Rights). By limiting access to foreign media, the Canadian government prevented Canadian citizens from educating themselves on foreign issues, having access to information which may be pertinent to their lives or businesses, and possibly limited foreign business and investment opportunities to Canadians. This denied the citizens of Canada the ability to make informed decisions and opportunities to increase their personal wealth. The citizens had already demonstrated, by means of their purchases, what media they wished to consume. By promoting domestic magazines over foreign magazines, the Canadian government may have kept some businesses, which were naturally going to close, artificially alive potentially leading to long-term damaging effects as the businesses slowly closed or were slow to move to digital

Read More

More about Little Sisters Vs. Canadian Charter: Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document