The murder of Andrew and Abby Borden has been referred to as an unsolved mystery for centuries. Investigators questioned a single suspect, commonly known as Lizzie Borden, the eldest daughter of Andrew Borden. After finding no physical evidence linking her to the murders, Lizzie was acquitted and the case was never opened again. Several sources have provided eye-opening facts that make me reconsider the true culprit. Lizzie Borden is the person guilty of both murders because of her contradictory testimony along with her alibi, the mental instability she displayed, and her strange behavior prior the murders.
First of all, Lizzie Borden is guilty of committing murder because of her strange testimony and alibi. Not only did Lizzie give an odd testimony, but her alibi doesn’t exactly make her seem innocent. According to Source #2, “At the time of her stepmother’s murder (around 9:30 A.M.), household
…show more content…
One example of her strange behavior was that she confided in a neighbor less than a day before the murders. While many individuals may argue these actions were a mere coincidence, it’s just too bizarre to disregard. As stated in Source 3, “On the night before the murders, Lizzie visited a neighbor, Alice Russell, and told her that she feared that some unidentified enemy might soon try to kill him.” If Lizzie Borden had these suspicions, why would she not communicate this to her father? It seems unlikely that Borden was not the killer if she expressed her uneasiness just a day before he was killed.. Furthermore, Lizzie Borden attempted to buy a dangerous chemical a few days before the murders. Source 1 claims, “ They did, however, establish that Lizzie had unsuccessfully attempted to purchase prussic acid, a highly poisonous liquid, in the days before the murders.” As expressed, Lizzie Borden was in fact guilty because of her questionable actions in the days leading up to to the