LJ-6 Explain the negative effects of the Roman conquests. The many conquests of Rome brought change to her over time. Some of the changes were good and enlightened them as a people, but some of them were bad as well we will illustrate. Power was and had always been sought after and maintained in the aristocracy. Along with the hunger for power, greed was also fostered as the empire grew in size and this was one of the truly negative effects. Rome also halted their policy of incorporation wherein they would include portions of the conquered peoples into her citizenry usually based on their strategic importance to Rome. This along with their inability to see that a large state cannot be efficiently run by having everyone participate …show more content…
It appears to me that slave labor grew out of the greed that had been growing in the ruling aristocracy of the time and their need for labor to work the ever growing land holdings. Those poor land owners had fallen victim to having their land seized due to debt repayment problems to the wealthy. It seems that history was repeating itself and also makes one realize that this same formula is used throughout history all over the world and still continues today. Their were some of those in Rome that were trying to improve all of her peoples living conditions, but they were not allowed to succeed due to the majority of the ruling classes greed. Tiberius Gracchus tried to help the common Roman people through his actions as a tribune in 133 B.C. by a familiar method, Agrarian reform. His proposals were met with out right rejections from the senate, but he ended up passing the law anyway. This action along with his announcing his illegal re-election bid for tribune according to Morey caused the senators to call-out “Tiberius as a traitor” ,but “the people extolled him as a patriot”. (1901) When election day came Tiberius Gracchus was murdered in the senate along with three-hundred of his followers by a group of senators led by Scipio Nasica. (Morey,