ipl-logo

Lj-6 Explain The Negative Effects Of The Roman Conquests

523 Words3 Pages

LJ-6 Explain the negative effects of the Roman conquests. The many conquests of Rome brought change to her over time. Some of the changes were good and enlightened them as a people, but some of them were bad as well we will illustrate. Power was and had always been sought after and maintained in the aristocracy. Along with the hunger for power, greed was also fostered as the empire grew in size and this was one of the truly negative effects. Rome also halted their policy of incorporation wherein they would include portions of the conquered peoples into her citizenry usually based on their strategic importance to Rome. This along with their inability to see that a large state cannot be efficiently run by having everyone participate …show more content…

It appears to me that slave labor grew out of the greed that had been growing in the ruling aristocracy of the time and their need for labor to work the ever growing land holdings. Those poor land owners had fallen victim to having their land seized due to debt repayment problems to the wealthy. It seems that history was repeating itself and also makes one realize that this same formula is used throughout history all over the world and still continues today. Their were some of those in Rome that were trying to improve all of her peoples living conditions, but they were not allowed to succeed due to the majority of the ruling classes greed. Tiberius Gracchus tried to help the common Roman people through his actions as a tribune in 133 B.C. by a familiar method, Agrarian reform. His proposals were met with out right rejections from the senate, but he ended up passing the law anyway. This action along with his announcing his illegal re-election bid for tribune according to Morey caused the senators to call-out “Tiberius as a traitor” ,but “the people extolled him as a patriot”. (1901) When election day came Tiberius Gracchus was murdered in the senate along with three-hundred of his followers by a group of senators led by Scipio Nasica. (Morey,

Show More
Related
1226 Words | 5 Pages

Tiberius Gracchus was a tribune who lived in Rome in the early-mid 1st century BC. Frank Herbert, an American author commented that “The stakes in conflict do not change. Battle determines who will control the wealth or its equivalent”. The actions of Tiberius Gracchus do support the statement by Herbert as the direct challenge to the authority of the Senate he made provoked the Senate to act in an extreme way to maintain power. Tiberius Gracchus was motivated by the people and his position to introduce the reforms and by doing this he threatens the peace in the Roman society.

Read More
626 Words | 3 Pages

Simon Baker's Ancient Rome, Tiberius Gracchus realized that the Senate was not in the best interest of the people and therefore tried to address one of Rome's biggest problems by become tribune and give the people back there land. He appealed to the common people by promising that he would get back what was rightful there's. This lead to him being voted in as tribune, and from there the problems of Rome, attempted solutions, and obstacles he faced only spiraled him down faster. Tiberius was well loved by the people, but not so much by the Senate. Simon Baker's Ancient Rome says it best by saying "As Tiberius left the Senate House in disgrace, he received a very different reception from the Roman people" (86).

Read More
1078 Words | 5 Pages

Romans would enslave men, women, and children after the conquest. They would also confiscate properties as rome would construct roads, fortifications, ports, and harbors to territories with Rome.

Read More
1808 Words | 8 Pages

Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, better known as the ‘Gracchi Brothers’ were a pair of tribunes descending from the plebs from the 2nd century BCE who sought to introduce land reforms and other legislations that aligned with their populist views/ideas. It can be said that the career of the two brothers was marked by murder, riots and outright manipulation of the power they were granted which completely altered the state of Roman politics- aiding in the breakdown of the Roman Republic. The legislation they sought to pass essentially redistributed major aristocratic land ownership among the commoners such as the urban poor and veterans. After achieving little success during the early stages of the reforms, both were assassinated by enemy parties.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

Citizenship in Athens & Rome: Which Was a Better System? The Romans left a powerful legacy that impacts our modern-day society. It was founded in 753 BC around the center of the Italian peninsula. They took up 15% of the world’s population by conquering territories in western Asia, southern Europe, and northern Africa.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

For example, a bill introduced by Tiberius was without consultation with the Senate, which “was not illegal, but it violated a custom of long standing.” Furthermore, upon receiving a veto by fellow tribune Marcus Octavius, Tiberius had him removed from office with his power, which was unconstitutional. Such actions on his behalf led the Senate to fear his growing alleged tyrant power which eventually led to a revolt in which Tiberius and many of his followers were killed. Similarly, Gaius Gracchus was killed along with his supporters by his political foes as a result of his agrarian reforms that were accumulating a massive public following. These events portray one of the biggest aspects of the Gracchi legacy, which was violence as a means of political resolution.

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

When Tiberius’s run came to an end his brother, Gaius, sought to continue what he started. He began this by removing the senate from the extortion

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the development of the colonies in America, slave trade grew to be a significant source of labor in primarily southern plantations within the late seventeenth to eighteenth centuries. During the era, with slaves being condemned to be considered socially inferior by law, and the increase in demand of goods such as rice and indigo, the slave labor force became a notable source for southern plantations in the eighteenth century. Slaves and people of color had always been considered to be socially inferior even before the colonies existed. With a sense of paternalism in Great Britain, people have always believed that those considered slaves,or servants rather, were second class citizens, and these people needed to be suppressed for their own best interests.

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

The plebeians grew in a lack of harmony as they waited for a tribune to be elected into the senate to serve as the plebeians voice (Movie). Not only did Tiberius Gracchus help between the disagreements between the rich, poor, and the Roman government; Gracchus also earned himself a well respected name in the eyes of

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

Rome was power hungry and didn’t think about long-term consequences. The Senate controlling the decisions of Rome held power unchecked by anyone. This can cause major problems for a country because many people have many different opinions. They desired to expand and rule a larger empire instead of bringing peace and evolutionary development to its population. Rome and America both created global structures, and the citizens and rest of the world were taken for granted.

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

Comparatively in early imperial China, although slavery existed, it was not essential to the functioning of society; instead the Chinese relied on system of forced labour, to meet their societies demand for cheap labour. General Theories of Slavery Historiography Slavery in the Mid to late Roman republic is well documented with a wide range of primary and secondary sources. Information regarding slavery comes from literary, and historical accounts, legal sources, inscriptions and other physical remains. The information conveyed through these sources regarding slavery, indicates that slavery was

Read More
228 Words | 1 Pages

The Fall of Ancient Rome A Persuasive Thesis Statement on Dark ages: Even though People may say it got better sadly, many people still died , the world was changed after the dark ages . There was war, death, and people struggled to survive. It was a time of anarchy and things were never the same after the fall of Rome. Firstly , Rome was attacked, robbed, and eventually taken over by barbarian tribes . When at war , tribes showed little mercy, killing many women and children.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

In my discussion forum post for this unit I will discuss the overall effect slavery had on the Roman economy. Discussion In ancient times, when a civilization defeated a rival army in battle, instead of killing those on the losing side, it was common practice to punish the loser by enslaving them (Kamm, 2009a). Moreover, the Romans were no exception to this rule, employing captured slaves throughout their empire (Kamm, 2009a).

Read More
1645 Words | 7 Pages

Living in such an enormous empire had its benefits. As a Roman, you had education, culture and the protection of the largest military empire on your side. Living in this Empire also had some notable drawbacks. The empire had extreme poverty rates, threats of being in a constant state of war, and the government could impose huge tax burdens on the people.

Read More
1117 Words | 5 Pages

Which components made the Roman Empire successful? Many components have contributed to the success of the Roman Empire. Firstly, a major component was the favorite geographical location of Rome. Rome is located on seven hills surrounded by a mountain range and lies at the mouth of the Tiber River in Italian Peninsula. The seven hills and the Alps mountain range had provided excellent protection with military advantages.

Read More

More about Lj-6 Explain The Negative Effects Of The Roman Conquests

Related Topics

Open Document