ipl-logo

Logic And Reasoning Of Citizens United Vs. FEC (2010)

1428 Words6 Pages

Analyzing the Logic and Reasoning of Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
Citizens United v. FEC (2010) represents a watershed moment in the United States Supreme Court, having a profound and lasting impact on campaign finance regulations and the boundaries of political speech. This comprehensive essay aims to thoroughly analyze the logical framework and reasoning employed in the case, going beyond a mere summary of arguments to provide a nuanced evaluation. By delving into the primary ideas and theories put forth by the author, this paper examines their strengths, weaknesses, logical fallacies, evidentiary support, and potential biases. Furthermore, additional research and credible sources will be incorporated to elucidate the complex issues surrounding …show more content…

FEC (2010) can be distilled into three fundamental assertions: (1) corporations and unions possess free speech rights protected by the First Amendment, (2) limitations on corporate and union spending in elections infringe upon their right to free speech, and (3) independent expenditures by corporations and unions do not lead to corruption or the appearance of corruption. These arguments formed the foundation of the Court's decision and warrant careful examination to comprehend the underlying logic.
The majority opinion contends that corporations and unions, as associations of individuals, enjoy the same free speech protections as individual citizens under the First Amendment. This argument rests on the interpretation that the scope of free speech should not be restricted solely to individuals but must encompass collective entities as well. While this interpretation may seem reasonable, critics contend that it grants an excessive level of influence to corporate entities, potentially overshadowing the voices of individual citizens and undermining the principle of political …show more content…

FEC (2010) has left an indelible mark on the landscape of campaign finance regulations and the boundaries of political speech in the United States. The logical framework and reasoning employed in the case have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate. While the majority opinion asserts that corporations and unions possess free speech rights, limitations on their spending infringe upon those rights, and independent expenditures do not lead to corruption, critics raise valid concerns about the potential for undue influence, the erosion of political equality, and the corruption of the democratic process.

Work Cited

United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).

Balkin, J. M., & Levinson, S. (2010). Understanding the Constitutional Revolution. Harvard Law Review, 124(8), 2021-2097.

Bonneau, C. W., & Hall, M. L. (2015). In Defense of Citizens United: How the Supreme Court Protected Political Speech. Journal of Law and Courts, 3(2), 245-273.

Hasen, R. L. (2017). Speech and democracy: A citizens united framework. Cornell Law Review, 103(6), 1203-1261.

Magliocca, G. N. (2015). Money, politics, and the Constitution: Beyond Citizens United. Yale University Press.

Somin, I. (2012). Citizens United and the right to vote: The constitutional case for limits on corporate electioneering. Supreme Court Economic Review, 20(1), 239-278.

Sunstein, C. R. (2010). Citizens United and the corporate court. The Yale Law Journal Online, 120,

Show More
Related
345 Words | 2 Pages

Based on the articles detailing opposing viewpoints about Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court’s decision is positive in the aspect of protecting free speech, and attempting to involve more citizens in political discussions. However, the decision does limit who possesses the most impact when participating in these conversations. Some aspects of Citizens United v. FEC support fundamental principles outlined in the constitution. Such that during the case “The government argued in Citizens United that it had the power to outlaw books and movies produced by unions and corporations, both non-profit and for-profit, if they included even a single line addressing an election or a political issue”(Dick 11).

Read More
1241 Words | 5 Pages

This essay was written in response to the following prompt: In his Wickard v. Filburn memorandum, Justice Jackson proposed that questions of constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause might be best thought of as political questions. Evaluate Jackson’s argument applying the reasoning of Baker v. Carr. Is the outcome the same for questions that fall under the categories described in Footnote 4 of Carolene Products? Application of Baker v. Carr in Carolene Products and Wickard Memorandum

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

In 1803 the Supreme Court which was led by a great man by the name of John Marshall chose a controversial case to take on that is still examined today by many. It is one of the most famous cases and goes by the name of Marbury vs Madsion. Now the question was whether a demonstration offensive to the constitution can turn into the tradition that must be abided by is an inquiry profoundly intriguing to the United States; however, not of an unpredictability proportioned to its advantage. It appears to be just important to perceive certain standards, expected to have been long and settled. The first argument was that the people have the original right to establish a constitution for now and, for the future generations.

Read More
1611 Words | 7 Pages

So what is the solution to solving the issues and dangers of the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC concerning campaign finance? It is clear that the best way to overcome the pitfalls of Citizens United is to create a new, stronger, and better developed piece of legislation to reverse the Supreme Court’s decision. The new legislation would need to highlight the strongest aspects of the BCRA as well as bring in new ideas to successfully limit campaign finance. To start, this new legislation should take aspects from the BCRA and strengthen those to avoid loopholes. The first aspect should be the ban on the solicitation and exchange of soft money by political parties.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

The articles written by Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer both contribute valid insight on how the Constitution should be interpreted. They, however, end up taking conflicting views on whether to adopt what is known as a living constitution or to bind the judiciary by the original meaning of the document. Throughout their works, the authors mention the importance of objectivity, judicial restraint and the historical context in which the Constitution was written under and whether or not it should apply to the United States today. Scalia argues in favor of the originalist approach, stating that he supports neither a strict nor a loose interpretation of the Constitution, but rather, a reasonable interpretation. Breyer sides with the cosequentialist ideals, claiming that active participation in collective power is paramount when it comes to evaluating the Constitution's place in American law.

Read More
433 Words | 2 Pages

The synopsis of the Citizens United case is that there cannot be a ban on a speech given based on the corporate identity of the speaker. This law was aimed at Senator Hillary Clinton who was receiving funds from for-profit organizations. As for Citizens United, this is a nonprofit organization that has a 12 million dollar budget. They came up with a 90 minute documentary in order to keep people from voting for Hillary Clinton. President Obama actually condemned the ruling in his 2010 state of the union address.

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

We see multiple successes of voting equality attempted through amendments, however, the Supreme Court’s decision on Shelby County v. Holder has pushed back years and years of effort for voting rights. Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling was in Shelby County’s favor, stating that the Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was unconstitutional along with Section 5. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr, who wrote the majority’s opinion, said that the power to regulate election was reserved to the states, not the federal government. As a result to the court’s decision, the federal government can no longer determine which voting law discriminates and can be passed. After the case, many states had freely passed new voting laws; the most common voting law states passed

Read More
1799 Words | 8 Pages

Throughout roughly the last one hundred years of U.S. history, one significant way lawmakers have attempted to address corruption within the government has been by implementing stricter regulations on the campaign finance system, while opponents of these regulations have argued they do not prevent corruption and have characterized them as limitations on freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution. From this, we see the problem is a tension between Congress’s authority to regulate and maintain fair and democratic elections and a disproportionate focus on freedom of speech. After examining current federal campaign finance laws, one would assume the United States has always had relatively weak laws in this field; however, that is not the

Read More
1113 Words | 5 Pages

Nobody wants to touch politics with a ten-foot pole. In an interview with comedian Russell Peters, he declared, “You can’t erase the past, all you can do is learn from it, because if you cancel it, erase it, it’s just going to repeat itself.” The American constitution prevents the government from censoring its citizens, but the founding fathers failed to predict that we would turn against each other. Blinded by their ‘good intentions,’ these activists violate our civil rights.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

We have spoken in this written assignment with the mindset that the founding fathers wanted the judicial system free of political drive but that is not possible, nor was it ever. The image of the Supreme Court not being persuaded by political entities is there only by

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

The first amendment of the United States Constitution is a crucial topic that guarantees fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and association. The first amendment protects the freedom of association, which emcompasses an individual’s right to join and leave groups as they please, and for the group to take collective action to pursue the common interest of the individuals in the group. The history of the freedom of association can be traced back to the founding of the United States, where the right of association was seen as a necessary component of democracy. The freedom of association can be explored into its history, the basis of the topic, and the interpretation of the courts, especially in cases; Gitlow v. New York, NAACP

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

“The Federal Election Commission is looking for ways to regulate political speech on the Internet.” (thehill.com). As everyone should know freedom of speech is the First Amendment in the constitutional bill of rights and one of if not the most

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

The Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civics video titled “Key Constitutional Concepts” explores the history of the creation of the United States Constitution in addition to key concepts crucial to the document. Two central themes explored in the video include the protection of personal rights and importance of checks and balances. The video strives to explain these concepts through Supreme Court cases Gideon v. Wainwright and Youngstown v. Sawyer. To begin, the video retraces the steps leading up to the Constitutional Convention in Virginia in 1787. It opens by explaining the conflict that led to the Revolutionary War and the fragility of the new nation.

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

Mill (1). Hoboken, GB: Wiley-Blackwell. Field, M. (2013). Law and Society: Congress, the Constitution, and Divided Government. El Paso, TX, USA: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme Court rulings on Marbury v. Madison (1803), Brown v. Board of Education (1954), and Roe v Wade (1973) are prime examples of how far-reaching this commitment truly is. The advancement of civil rights through President Obama's executive order on immigration further demonstrates that we are dedicated to steadily expanding these fundamental notions of justice throughout society until equality before the law is achieved by everyone regardless of race, gender, or social status. American democracy remains a work in progress with continual challenges emerging in pursuit of fairness for all citizens; however, those core principles are intact since 1776 when America declared independence from Great Britain--and will remain

Read More

More about Logic And Reasoning Of Citizens United Vs. FEC (2010)

Related Topics

Open Document