Lord Of The Flies Ethically Good

There is always a sense of “good” and “bad” throughout life. Typically, humans tend to follow the positives more than the negatives. However, sometimes, the concept of what is “good” ethically is not logically good, and what is “bad” is not logically bad. In these cases, the gift of reason comes into play. Unfortunately, not everyone is blessed with a sense of rationality; instead, they rely on their instincts and others to push them in the right direction. In Lord of the Flies, Simon, while not presenting a gift to the reader, provides the gift of reasoning to the group of boys, which allows the audience to differentiate the “good” and “bad” of the groups. Throughout the book, the reader is instantly presented with two groups of people: those who are intent on everyone leaving in one

He is the logical thinker of the group, who helps them when times get rough. His character seems to represent a Christ figure for the boys, being named after one of the several apostles of Christ. He embodies human goodness with his sacrificial nature, notably giving up his time and energy for the good of his group. He realizes that the “monster” on the island isn’t literal; rather, it is a metaphor for the destructive nature of the other characters. Unfortunately, he is killed before he can deliver his epiphany to the other boys. Even his death was a symbol of the end of all logical thinking, where the other boys truly revert to their chaotic tendencies. The audience of “Lord of the Flies” is presented with the consequence of losing the gift of reasoning as the story progresses. Being the first of many deaths in the book, Simon’s passing displays a loss of humanity in the boys, which becomes clear with the rapid increase of killings that happen afterward. William Golding dictates to the reader that rationalization is significant in the most obscure events, and without it, chaos