ipl-logo

Machiavelli's The Prince

648 Words3 Pages

The book The Prince by Machiavelli is a depiction of the renaissance because Machiavelli describes the different kinds of states, a prince can rest on the favor of the people if he has shown certain qualities of leadership and courage towards the people and the prince needs to treat nobles differently according to how they are inclined towards him. Machiavelli uses these rules to show how a prince should conduct his actions in the renaissance time period. A prince needs to know these rules to correctly oversight his kingdom/state precisely and efficiently. According to The Prince, the states are either ruled by a prince or a republic these states are known as, principalities. They can be divided into hereditary principalities and new principalities. By fortune or strength, a prince can acquire a new principality with his army. According to The Prince, a hereditary state is easier to govern than a new state. For example the people of hereditary states live under the rule of the royal family that the state has been with the family for generations. Also, the Prince’s subjects in a hereditary state most show love to the royal family, if the Prince commits some horrible act against his people they do not have to show love. The Prince indicates that …show more content…

If a prince shows quality of leadership and courage he will win the heart of his people. By winning the heart of his people a prince can maintain order with less anarchy against his ruling. Allowing less civil wars to be had between his people because a prince’s strong characteristic of leadership. The people will be more open and going along with the prince’s ideas. Therefore, fewer wars will break out between his people if they are all united under the prince’s rules. A prince must have courage so than his people will have the courage to follow the prince through all his actions allowing the princes ruling to be

Show More
Related
1824 Words | 8 Pages

In the story of "The Prince" written by Niccole Machiavelli takes place in the sixteenth century, around the time when Italy was not a unified country. Rather, it was more of a collection of city-states, each with its own court and ruler, all aiming to gain power over one another. On top of the commotion from the toggle war of power between the city states, Italy became a battleground for the French, the Spanish, the Germans, and as well as the Catholic Church under the Popes. At the time the Popes had so much power, that they were practically equal to a secular king during that time period. Prior of when Italy became a battle ground the major Italian city-state, the republic of Florence, had established ties as an alliance with the French.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

He also emphasizes the importance’s that a prince must maintain his power. He said that war, A prince, therefore, must not have any other object nor any other thought, nor must he take anything as his profession but war, it's institutions, and it's discipline; because that is the only profession which befits one who commands; and it is of importance

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the chapter, Machiavelli uses authoritative language to help convince the reader and prince that his ideas are worthy of being followed. “A prince must

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

Principalities are territories or states ruled over by a prince that constitute some of the strongest and weakest kingdoms through the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. All of which, Machiavelli states, need the prince to reside among his people and trust in his own wit and strength to maintain power. However, hereditary, civic, and ecclesiastical principalities differ in how the prince rose to power and have separate secondary methods of sustaining power. Hereditary principalities have been ruled by one family for several generations and are much easier to manage than

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

If there is hatred in the prince’s civilians, then there is revolt and the prince will be dethroned. If there is hatred in the foreign civilians, then there is war. But once the prince wins the war, he will gain control of the enemy state. The foreign civilians that hated him will fall under his domain. While the new civilians will hate the prince at first, this hatred will fade as they realize the extent of the prince’s protection.

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

The Prince, written by Machiavelli, is a candid outline of how he believes leaders gain and keep power. Machiavelli uses examples of past leaders to determine traits that are necessary to rule successfully. Leaders such as the King of Naples and the Duke of Milan lacked military power, made their subjects hate them, or did not know how to protect themselves from the elite, causing them to lose power. He says that these rulers should blame laziness, not luck, for their failures. By looking at these historical successes and failures, Machiavelli is able to develop his own thoughts on how politics and leaders should be in the future.

Read More
1519 Words | 7 Pages

Hence, he uses personal pronouns like “you” and “I” as well as phrases like “My reply is.” This makes it seem like The Prince becoming famous was neither Machiavelli’s first priority nor real purpose; he simply wanted to express his knowledge on the western government and gives advice on how to be a strong leader. Also, some of his words sound like he was in grief. For instance, the sentence that says “But as soon as you need help, they turn against you.” It could be that he was disappointed or was betrayed that he decided to put together The Prince.

Read More
224 Words | 1 Pages

According to Machiavelli, a prince who keeps his promises is generally praised. But history demonstrates that most success is achieved when princes are crafty, tricky and able to deceive others. A prince can fight or succeed by using law or by using force. The use of law comes naturally to men and the use of force comes naturally to beasts. Hence, to achieve success, the prince must learn to fight with a balance between both law and force.

Read More
1284 Words | 6 Pages

In Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, he maintains a harsh perspective on reality. His advice on how to maintain power leaves no room for compassion or generousity. While some may believe that these are qualities of a good person, Machiavelli believes these qualities lead to the downfall of rulers. He acknowledges that, in reality, it is impossible for someone to have qualities of a good person and simultaneously a good ruler. Machiavelli’s realistic outlook causes him to emphasize that it is better to maintain power through fear, rather than compassion.

Read More
1572 Words | 7 Pages

For these reasons, he should turn to his own arms. By all means, Machiavelli stated that it is not fortune and wickedness which leads to a good prince; it is intelligence and skills which are important. To be specific, he can try to strengthen its own military to defeat his nation during war rather than concerning himself relies on others. Moreover, a prince should be himself and do not change. To illustrate, he should live with his people so that any unexpected circumstances will not make him change whether the situation is good or bad.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513, a time when Italy as a whole had yet to be formed; the Italian subcontinent consisted only of loosely connected groups of independent city states with a constantly evolving political battleground. Thus Machiavelli wrote The Prince to convey his idea of a strong, active, and in his own eyes, perfect ruler to the current ruling family, the Medici, as he wished to impress them and become an eventual political attaché for the family. Machiavelli argues that when given a choice it is better to be feared than loved, and bases the majority of his rhetorical argument on logical cause and effect conclusions that are exemplified through his use of anecdotes, and analogy. The excerpt begins at chapter fifteen with Machiavelli stating that he writes the prince in order to “make something useful for whoever understands it” (Machiavelli ch.15), and he expounds upon this simple purpose by devising clear and logical solutions to many of the problems that a ruler may face.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Being a prince is not as easy as it may seem. There are good and bad decisions a prince can make. Machiavelli has his own standards on how a prince should behave. According to Machiavelli, a prince could be considered a lion, a fox, or a wolf. The lion is fierce but doesn’t have the smarts, while a fox has the smarts but isn 't fierce.

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

Probably one of the most infamous and controversial ideologies of the 16th century, the prince by Machiavelli has been a reference for many great leaders and academicians since it was published. The book provides historically tested and proven principles of leadership. The prince has been described as a manual for those who want to win and retain power. While some may argue that leadership is an inherent trait in human, leaders are made, not born. Making a great leader out of a person is not just a matter of identifying the leadership traits, skill and talents of the individual, but harnessing the traits, develop them and eventually mastering how to be leader.

Read More
1526 Words | 7 Pages

I. Machiavelli In his famous work the Prince Niccolo Machiavelli exposes what it takes to be a good prince and how only this good price and keep control over his state. There are many different qualities that make a man a good ruler but there are some that are more essential than others. In this work Machiavelli stresses the importance of being a warrior prince, a wise prince, and knowing how to navigate the duality of virtù and vices. Without these attributes there was no way that a prince could hold together their state and their people.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

He cannot be too generous, because that increases people 's expectations of him and it is impossible to keep buying the people 's love as the price gets too high. Yet, the prince should not be hated due to his violent nature, because that rises up. The prince should act in ways that keep him in power and maintain his own power. He should be able to read the character and motives of others in order to use them for his own ends.

Read More

More about Machiavelli's The Prince

Related Topics

Open Document