ipl-logo

Marcia Angell's Argument Summary

646 Words3 Pages

Assignment 1: Explicating arguments The article Marcia Angell wrote discusses the ethics of running clinical trials in areas of poverty such as third world countries. It is largely stressed that the well-being of participants should be the main priority of the study, above research goals and quick results. She explains that participants in clinical trials must receive the best-known treatment available when part of the control group; otherwise, researchers would knowingly be giving participants sub-par treatment compared to the drug being studied. To enact justice, even those living in third world countries should be receiving the same treatment that a participant in a first world country would receive. A placebo must be strictly avoided unless there is no known …show more content…

Likewise, the best treatment should not refer to local treatment standards, but the best standards available to maximize the beneficence and justice applied to participants already undertaking the burden of participating in a clinical trial. Unfortunately, ethical principles can sometimes be neglected due to competition in the field and the increase of regulations. This has resulted in some ethically questionable trials based in third world countries that violate justice, autonomy, and beneficence to obtain faster results. Harold Varmus and David Satcher’s perspective on what standards and guidelines should be implemented in clinical trials in third world countries differs from that of Angell’s arguments. They make the argument that compared to other approaches, a placebo is the most justified way to obtain clear and rapid results from clinical trials regardless of what treatments may currently be available. In their paper, they take stance on obtaining results that can be interpreted more rapidly and more efficiently; including the use of a placebo controlled study, even if a known treatment exists. By using a placebo controlled study, there will be less need for more subjects, which would

Show More
Related

Segal And Spaeth's Argument Analysis

1314 Words | 6 Pages

In regards to the detailed studies of both Segal and Spaeth, and Brenan and Stier, valid points had been made for both sides of the argument. The question posed is rather or not stare decisis still exist in the courts rulings today. Segal and Spaeth analyze the rulings of dissenting judges of landmark cases since the start of the Warren Court while excluding cases with unanimous decisions and cases without progeny within the legal period. The areas of which they dissected and constructed the particular datasets for analyzing is superb as it specifically narrows down the specific information there looking for within their results. The findings from there assessments concluded that precedent did not play a overwhelming role in the sub sequential

Read More

Summary Of The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lack

1835 Words | 8 Pages

“The Article Exploitation of prisoners in clinical research: perceptions of study participants” written by Paul Christopher states “Given the history of and continued potential for prisoner exploitation, biomedical research should be permitted only if there is a strongly favorable benefit-risk ratio for the prisoner.” Even though Henrietta Lacks was not in a clinical trial she did not receive all the information from her Doctors which led to her downfall. This lack of information not only hurt her but it also hurt her family. The worst part yet Henrietta and her family were not the only ones who were lied to because Chester Southam not only used prisoners for research but he used hospitalized people. He told the patients that he was checking their immune system when in fact he was injecting them with HeLa cells.

Read More

Irene Silverblatt's Argument Analysis

355 Words | 2 Pages

Quotation: “It was the modern word’s signature to etch economic dominance and political supremacy into a radical cultural design. It was also its signature to hide the social relations that were brewing supremacy and conflict behind a semblance of “race things.” (Silverblatt, 3) Argument: Here, Irene Silverblatt is arguing that, like all colonial powers, the Inquisition of Peru racialized certain groups, in this case the Native Americans. She argues that the foundation of colonial empire is racial segregation where the people who are conquered were treated as inferior human beings. They purposely created unequal groups where the Africans and their descendant were reserved for slavery and had to give up their way of life.

Read More

Arthur Caplan's Argument Essay

660 Words | 3 Pages

For many people, gaining a competitive edge is crucial in one 's success, even if it comes at a cost. In modern professional and amateur sports, the introduction of performance enhancing drugs has dramatically changed the nature of the game. Arthur Caplan, author of A Shot in the Rear: Why Are We Really against Steroids?, presented argumentative reasons from both supporters and objectors of steroid use. While Caplan attempted to use persuasive appeals, the lack of sources used combined with a poor structure severely weakened his argument. In order to enhance his argument, Caplan used persuasive appeals, such as logos and ethos.

Read More

Bonnie Docherty's Argument Essay

97 Words | 1 Pages

Bonnie Docherty does not support the idea of using robot for warfares due to moral issues. She states :”It would undermine human dignity to be killed by a machine that can’t understand the value of human life.”. She also convokes the ban on the use of robots in war “before humanity crosses what she calls a moral threshold.”. She emphasizes how these machines will completely change the way of war like what gunpowder and nuclear have done. Thus, she worries about what these machines are capable of doing and who will take the responsible for war

Read More

Raylan's Argumentative Essay

1266 Words | 6 Pages

Raylan Givens was holding a federal warrant to serve on a man in the marijuana trade known as Angel Arenas, forty-seven, born in the U.S. but 100 percent of him Hispanic. “I met him,” Raylan said, “the time I was on court duty in Miami and he was up for selling khat. That Arab plant you chew on and get high.” “Just medium high,” Rachel Brooks said, in the front seat of the SUV, Raylan driving, early morning sun showing behind them. “Khat’s just catchin on, grown in California, big in San Diego among real Africans.”

Read More

Purpose Of The Tuskegee Syphilis Study

1564 Words | 7 Pages

Bioethics research studies are defined as studies that focus on the ethics and philosophical implications in medicine (Dictionary).   The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is a prime example of a bioethical research that was ongoing from 1932 until 1972 at the Tuskegee Institute in Macon, Alabama.   The United States Public Health Services (USPHS) and the Tuskegee Institute were responsible for carrying out the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.   The sole purpose of the study was to monitor the effects syphilis has on the human body when allowed to go untreated.  

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Clinical Equipoise

1439 Words | 6 Pages

Throughout history, we have seen many unethical forms of human research done, which have ultimately led to dire consequences (Brandt, Lecture 7, Slide 6). Today, ethical research tools have been put forward to determine when experimentation for human research should be allowed. Equipoise is the balance between two conflicting demands, where one demand will promote the welfare of the patient while the other demand will promote the advancement of medical knowledge (Freedman, 1987, 95). There are two types of equipoise: clinical equipoise and therapeutic equipoise. Clinical equipoise looks at the balance through the scientific community, whereas therapeutic equipoise looks at the balance through the judgment of a single physician (Weiger et al., 2013, 93).

Read More

Lori Gruen's Argument Analysis

475 Words | 2 Pages

The argument presented by Lori Gruen questions the idea of natural and normative. Lori Gruen introduces the idea of natural, pondering the idea as something instinctual or cultural. The traditionally defended argument is that dominating animals in any sense is valid since it serves our self desires(47). Furthermore, perceiving it as an evolutionary necessity as humans developed the ability to further their own interests at the expense of moral agents. On the other hand, Gruen argues the claim of evolutionary necessity is not morally permissible, and justifying the lack of moral attention for the interests of other species for the rudimentary differences between her, a moral agent, and a moral patient.

Read More

Why Is Placebos Important

469 Words | 2 Pages

The Use of Placebos in a Clinical Setting Placebos are a controversial topic in the medical and the ethical world. Placebos are what doctors have given to patients or participants as the ‘control group” to see if a drug works properly. Placebos are also given to see if the patient or participants need an active medication to heal. In this essay, I, will argue against the use of Placebos in a clinical setting.

Read More

Lisa Mcgirr's Argument Essay

72 Words | 1 Pages

My great-grandfather Vincenzo negotiated Prohibition by fermenting two barrels of wine a year. It was perfectly legal, he insisted. Vincenzo was lucky to be a New Yorker. In her fine history of Prohibition, “The War on Alcohol,” Lisa McGirr, a professor of history at Harvard, shows us that a poor Italian in Illinois or a black man in Virginia might very well have been jailed, shot or sentenced to a chain

Read More

Pelle's Argumentative Essay

1010 Words | 5 Pages

According to FIFA, the is over 295 million kids/adults actively playing “The Beautiful Game” all over the globe. To see real passion for soccer, go to Brazil and watch their style of playing, it’s amazing. Many may think most famous people grew up with the perfect life, but it was different for Pelé. For Pelé to achieve his success, he trained in the streets with only a sock ball. Money didn’t stop him from becoming who he is today.

Read More

Inclusive, Ethical Approach Model

392 Words | 2 Pages

The authors’ supporting argument is that in order to combat these problems of informed consent and ethical approval, the only logical solution is to develop an inclusive, ethical approach model. Throughout the article they introduce their development of responses to the problems encountered in the field and the ethical approval process. In doing so, they briefly demonstrate how the system lacks an effective model and the factors that need to be taken into account when building an ethical model. “Each of the authors drew on a combination of internal and external resources so as to develop more inclusive ethical approaches to obtaining consent from their vulnerable research participants” (Czymoniewicz-Klippel, Brijnath, & Crockett, 2010, p. 337).

Read More

Human Experimentation Summary

1536 Words | 7 Pages

William A. Silverman’s Human Experimentation: A Guided Step into the Unknown, he encourages that we can do human experiments as long as it is a careful experimentation. He mentioned that randomized clinical trials that shows careful experimentation leads to effective therapy and a clearer understanding of clinical anomalies. With that being said, aside from effective therapies, clinical anomalies can be understood better through careful experimentation of randomized clinical studies, clinical anomalies can therefore be prevented (Silverman, 1985). Silverman has mentioned that human experimentation must be careful. He defined ‘being careful’ as being always reminded the codes and the laws that surrounds the field of experimentation using humans

Read More

Lia Dawson's Argument Essay

509 Words | 3 Pages

Dawson effectively validates her argument that celebrities greatly influence videos that go viral by having a well-balanced approach to rhetorical strategies. In this article, Lia Dawson discusses how certain YouTube videos have gone viral while some have not, even though they follow the same pattern as the popular videos. There are copious factors that can contribute to a video’s popularity, including: “the ability to parody it, its unexpectedness,” etc., but she contends celebrities are the most influential factor in deciding how popular a video will become. From here, she begins crafting the evidence to support her argument (using ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos).

Read More

More about Marcia Angell's Argument Summary

Open Document