Mask Of Agamemnon Analysis

When you think of Heinrich Schliemann do you think of him as a hero or a fraud? I personally believe he is a hero because he paved the way for modern archaeology. Unfortunately many people believe he was a crook by smuggling his own findings and using former archaeologists information to find excavating sites . The video clip: Mask of Agamemnon, the persuasive essay: Heinrich Schliemann, the father of archeology and Heinrich Schliemann, archeological con artist. All of these sources have their similarities and differences. For one, the father of archaeology and the mask of Agamemnon have many similarities and the father of archaeology and Heinrich Schliemann con artist have many differences. The article Heinrich Schliemann, father of archaeology and the video clip, the mask of Agamemnon

In the article: Heinrich Schliemann, father of archaeology the author believes Schliemann should be remembered for paving the way for modern archaeology. In con artist the author stated that he smuggled his own findings. Seriously, how can you smuggle something that you found and he didn't really smuggle it, he found it, cleaned it and sent it off to a museum where people in the future would come and see those amazing finds. In father of archaeology the author believes Schliemann was a hero and in the text it stated it is very unfortunate that many people believe he was a crook. Heinrich Schliemann, con artist and the mask of Agamemnon also have many differences. In the video clip the mask of Agamemnon the person talks about the mask of Agamemnon and how Heinrich Schliemann paved the way for modern archaeology. In the article con artist the author says that he was a liar and a fraud. The author says this because he used other people to find artifacts. I do not believe this because the author had no evidence why this was