ipl-logo

Max Weber On Social Class

1132 Words5 Pages

Social class is difficult to grasp but being able to look at two different theorist’s views, narrows down the outlook of the stratification within societies. Through the exploration of Max Weber, a prominent theorist in the 19th century and another prominent theorist in Karl Marx, we see their varying views on social class within society. It is interesting to see the way these two theorists see society in similar lights but they view the nature of class very differently. This essay will look into an outline of both Weber and Marx’s conceptions and examine the manner of these views of social class in the society. With this knowledge, there will be a conclusion drawn about how there may be similarities but there are differences in their final …show more content…

As we open Weber’s theory there were three areas of importance within the stratification of society. He looks at economic power, similar to Marx, but also adds in social status and party to this determination. With the three of these determinants, there becomes multiple possible positions within society in contrast to Marx and his ‘bipolar model’ (Giddens, 2013:486). Weber found more than the mere economic. He found this to be,”” naked” money power” and felt it did not recognise a basis to people’s social honour in society. (Gane,, 2001:215)

With these two conceptions coming from a similar starting point, that social class is founded on that economic power within society. Weber expands on it to more than means of production. He looks at the types of work people gave and how this can influence their position in society. He defines class as a group of individuals who share a similar position in market economy and by virtue of that fact receive similar economic rewards. For example, professionals will earn more and benefit within their working conditions compared to unskilled workers who work for minimal wage and usually with not the best working …show more content…

This relates to the common aims people have in a group, such as a political party alliance. This in weber’s view was an “important aspect of power” (Giddens, 2013:486) Some parties however are hidden, such as a protestant ethnic group. This group is there for religious reasons and Weber found this establishment and power in-fact aided the development of capitalism, within society.
Parties are inevitably based on class and status already stated. Weber saw a relationship between the three. Gerth and Mills (1958) showed how weber stated, ‘parties may represent interests determined through “class situation” or “status situation” and they may recruit their following, respectively, from one or the other.’ (weber, 1958:194) He showed the way these determents of stratification over lapped into how people were grouped off and the outcome was not a clear-cut conclusion.

Looking at Weber’s conceptions as a whole we can see the three components fit into different stratifications. With Class looking at the economic power someone holds, status looks at their lifestyles within society and party shows the struggle for power between groups, political or other. But with these three components together they all look at the larger picture and within society no one is confined to a specific

Show More
Related
1126 Words | 5 Pages

Being born into a particular family determines how well off you are. Class in America determines the people that influence you, and the better opportunities you are exposed to. In Gregory Mantsios writing of “Class in America” you can understand the many differences between class and how one might have better success. Mantsios shows three profiles of three different people born into different classes. One of the profiles shows how the lifestyle might be born into a wealthy family.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

Social classes have been in existence since we got off the mayflower and are still heavily relied on today. We live in a society where your social status matters wherever you go. Trust me, we’ve all have been victims to deeming different sides of a town “upscale” or “ghetto”. You have the people that define themselves as their social class or you have people that don’t really pay attention to it. Even if you don’t pay attention to it, the thought is still evident.

Read More
841 Words | 4 Pages

According to Marx society was divided into two classes that were in eternal conflict in the battle for resources, or as Marx coined; “the means of production”. The first class were the bourgeoisie, which Marx described as the sole owners of the means of production as well as the media. The bourgeoisie used their power and influence to exploit the second class, which Marx called the proletariat which consisted of all the workers of the world. Marx rejected the idea that the wealthy pulled themselves from their own bootstraps, which he called “false consciousness” and in return coined the term “class consciousness”, which referred to a persons awareness of their own social status, especially in terms of class conflict. Overall, Marx concluded that social order is created maintained by domination and power.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Class is a social system of hierarchy based on economic wealth. Joseph O. Jewell, author of Race, Social Reform, and the Making of a Middle Class: The American Missionary Association and Black Atlanta, 1870-1900, explains class as to “exist in large part as cultures-shared set of rules, ideologies, or

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

When talking about social class the sub theme that is also brought up is reputation, and how reputation can differ depending on your social class. For example Thomas Putnam states that “We vote by name in this society, not by acreage.” The second point that will be brought up in

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

There is lower, middle, and upper class, but there are also subcategories that fill the gaps in between, like the impoverished and the top one percenters. “Class in America”, written by Gregory Mantsios, addresses the myths and realities about socioeconomic class in America and how they affect American lives. His article highlights the unequal divide that has persisted over the course of history and will continue to manifest in the future. To introduce the existence of this issue, Mantsios states that this country’s citizens “don’t like to talk about class...or class privileges, or class oppression, or the class nature of society” (Mantsios 378). This is the case in America today because people are neglecting to acknowledge the existence of these elusive

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

social class can be hard to define. There is low status consistency which means have important jobs, but make moderate income. Social class can change during a person’s lifetime. It will either go up or down, but most of the time it stays the same. Social class can have effects on health, political attitudes, and prison rates.

Read More
1079 Words | 5 Pages

This is an important task from a sociological point of view as being well read in various sociological and political ideologies aids one in forming one’s own opinions. 1. Class struggles are a fundamental part of human history:

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

I believe social classes have defined our society in many ways. In America, they separate people into three different classes: the upper class, middle class, and the lower or working class. Based on wealth and various occupations, social classes determine the population’s status in society. Social classes today define individuals and influence their actions. Although people born in a certain class may choose to stay there, they also have the choice of leaving.

Read More
1195 Words | 5 Pages

Social class is in his definition mainly based on economical assets, where strata goes beyond economic wealth: it can be possession the religious insight, intellectuality or political engagement (Weber 1958). Political dedication is one of his main themes; Weber distinguishes between people living for politics or off politics. A person who is passionate about politics, lives for politics as a vocation, in Weber’s (1958, 5) terms: ‘Either he enjoys the naked possession of the power he exerts, or he nourishes his inner balance and self-feeling by the consciousness that his life has meaning in the service of a 'cause '’. The opposite of living for politics is living off politics. By this, Weber means a person, a person who seeks economical wealth of political engagement.

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

“In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebeians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations” (Manifesto, 1848). In the Communist manifesto, Marx discusses the class type of his time, bourgeois and proletariat. The bourgeois were the higher class who exploited the proletariats. They constantly strived to expand their power and wealth in society.

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

Although they actually share some similarities, Weber’s analysis of class, change, capitalism and history differ radically from the views by Marx. Marx believed in capitalism and class conflict whereas Weber believed in rationalisation and bureaucracy. Both Marx and Weber agreed that there was many problems within modern society. Marx had an optimistic view about the future of society and he was confident that his theory would improve the lives of those in society. Weber however took more of a pessimistic view arguing that society is characterised by the process of rationalisation.

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

In his work, Marx focused on two antagonistic classes of capitalists and workers to demonstrate uneven distribution of material resources and exploitation power, also rooted in economic relations, within society. Hence, in the Marxian framework, social position could be treated as a unidimensional construct. Weber extended Marx’s analytical scheme by introducing additional components of social position, “status” and “party”. Status, or prestige,

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

Karl Marx and Max Weber both agreed that capitalism generates alienation in modern societies, but the cause for it were both different. For Marx it is due to economic inequality in where the capitalist thinks that the workers worth nothing more than a source of labour, that can be employed and dismissed at will. This causes the workers to be dehumanised by their jobs (in the past, routine factory work and in the present-day, managing demands on a computer), which leads to the workers finding slight satisfaction and feeling incapable of improving their situation. It was noted by Marx four methods on how capitalism alienates workers. The first, is alienation from the function of working.

Read More
1443 Words | 6 Pages

Social classes are a form of social stratification that refers to the existence of structured inequalities between individuals and groups in society. A social class is a group of people of comparable status, power and wealth which are usually classified as upper class, middle class, and lower class. For each class, there are some specific opportunities available that influence their social life. We can understand about the particularity of the chances through unequal distribution of these opportunities between individuals in social classes. In here belonging to a social class seems to be an obstacle for some individuals to obtain equal opportunity, unlike upper class people.

Read More

More about Max Weber On Social Class

Related Topics

Open Document