ipl-logo

Medical Experiments And The Nuremberg Trials During The Holocaust

2093 Words9 Pages

Medical Experiments and the Nuremberg Trials Imagine a normal day in a concentration camp, being starved and worked to death and being tortured on a daily basis. This was only a small portion of the torture the Jews went through during their life in the Holocaust. A major part of it was the medical experiments and the Euthanasia murders. Sadly, the Nazis would kill German Jews and many other races to please Hitler. All of the plans carried through, with the help of Josef Mengele, caused a lot of damage during the war. Eventually, when the war died down, Hitler and his men were finally put on trial for their wrongdoings, these trials were called the Nuremberg Trials.
The biological state of Germany became worse after Hitler took over the media; …show more content…

Winston Churchill started the road to the Nuremberg Trials, he wanted a summary execution for the Nazis, in which the Americans had agreed on. After the Allied Powers found out about Hitler’s actions, they agreed to punish Germany for their murders in 1942. To complete this task, the Soviet Union leader, Stalin, executed 50,000-100,000 German staff officers. A total of twenty-four German leaders were accused along with six Nazi organizations. During the trials, each defendant was allowed to choose their own lawyer depending on if they were going to have harsh punishment (German Leaders) or gentle treatment (soldiers) (“Nuremberg Trials”).
One of the many issues with the trials were the international criminals spoke four different languages. To help make the trials run smoothly, they recruited men and women to translate the words over the phone. Also, in order to set up the Nuremberg Trials, they had to bypass the legal and procedural difficulties. There were no earlier laws in the Judicial Branch for International Trial of war criminals. Earlier trials were passed because the laws were passed by a single nation, while the Nuremberg trials consisted of four countries (France, Britain, United States, and Soviet Union) (“Nuremberg …show more content…

On August 8th, 1945, the London charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT) passed the laws/procedures for the Nuremberg Trials. The charter also recognized three categories of crimes; crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Later on, in 1945-1946, the Major War Criminals’ Trial began with defense attorneys, prosecutors, and U.S. and UK laws. The only difference was, instead of a single jury, a tribunal (a panel of judges) came up with the verdict. Each country of the Allied powers had a main judge and an alternate judge (“Nuremberg Trials”). Also, there was new technology (monographs) that helped with the medical criminality and finding the twenty-three defendants put on trial during the “Doctor Trials” (“Bryant”).
The Nuremberg Trials were a milestone for courts and many Nazis were found throughout the process of thirteen years. The purpose of these trials was mainly for bringing the Jews to Justice and punishing the German Leader (1945-1958). Also, these trials were looked at as a milestone for permanent international court and also helped with further problems

Show More
Related

The Schutzstaffel: Hitler's Reign Of Power In Nazi Germany

579 Words | 3 Pages

On November 14, 1945, the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials began in Germany. They were to be the definitive judgement of the crimes against humanity by the Nazis. In the midst of the trial, it was determined that the SS, along with its associated organizations such as the Sicherheitsdienst (SD--the security and intelligence organization within the SS) and Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo—State Secret Police), was a criminal organization.1 The verdict placed on the SS was as follows:

Read More

Denying The Holocaust Denier, By Deborah Lipstadt

1214 Words | 5 Pages

The trial covered the three main factors of denying the Holocaust. The biggest accusations claim was that there was no proof of the Nazi’s having an organized plan to eliminate Jews, that there was no proof that Hitler ordered the extermination or did not know of the extermination of Jews, and that no Jews were killed with the use of gas chambers. He believed specifically that no Jew was ever murdered by gassing at the Auschwitz extermination camp. The trial began in January of 2000 and ended, with a judgment strongly in favor of Lipstadt and her publisher, in April of that year. The purpose of the trial was for Irving to gain his credibility back.

Read More

Justice Jackson Accomplishments

1293 Words | 6 Pages

Taking on this role in the Nuremberg trials required him to “determining the crimes with which the Nazi leaders would be charged, establishing the judicial procedures to be used, choosing a site for the trial, working out staggering logistic al problems created by many languages and represented countries, and actually trying the case” (Domnarksi 27). Justice Jackson had a particular gift of being able to identify a dramatic moment and capitalize on it. One moment of this came at the end of the Nuremberg trials during his closing argument. He started the statement with comparing the Hitler to Shakespeare’s Richard III and then finished the beautiful statement by saying, “If you were to say of these men hat they are not guilty, it would be as true to say there has been no war, there are no slain, there has been no crime” (E. London 506). Justice Jackson successfully prosecuted the Nazi war criminals in a system that had never before been established.

Read More

Essay On The Nuremburg Trials

746 Words | 3 Pages

Although millions were murdered during the Holocaust, many war criminals were brought to trial and convicted for their crimes (Nuremburg Trials). The Nuremberg trials were a series of thirteen trials carried in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949.

Read More

How The Nuremberg Trials Changed History

678 Words | 3 Pages

The Trials That Changed History “The Nuremberg Trial of German war criminals was tactically based on recognition of the principle: criminal actions cannot be excused if committed on government orders; conscience supersedes the authority of the law of the state. -Albert Einstein”. During World War II, many Nazis committed horrible crimes, including murder and human experiments. While the war was going on, they were not punished, and were not even recognized for their crimes. However, The Nuremberg Trials in Germany, punished many Nazis for their crimes, and proved that evil will be punished.

Read More

Impact Of The Nuremberg Trials

742 Words | 3 Pages

The Impact of the Nuremberg Trials Noah Matt Albia High School English 10 Mrs. Lawson 29 March 2023 Title The Holocaust was one of the most decisive times in human history, but oftentimes its aftermath is severely overshadowed. The Nuremberg trials permanently altered the course of global history, and international law.

Read More

Extreme Punishment In Argentina

712 Words | 3 Pages

These were trials held in Germany to convict Nazi war criminals and bring them to justice. They were a collection of 13 trials, from 1945-1949. The defendants included: Nazi party officials, high ranking military officers, and Nazi lawyers and doctors. The most commonly indicted on charges of peace crimes against humanity, and murder. Strangely, these trials were slightly controversial at that time, but today they are not.

Read More

Major War Criminal Trials

1124 Words | 5 Pages

Moreover, the crimes committed by these people were quite inhumane as in some cases, industrialists were charged for slave labor and doctors were charged for performing inhumane experiments on prisoners. The number of defendants in the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials were far greater than the Major War Criminal Trial. “ In total the

Read More

Did The Nuremberg Trials Bring Justice To The Victims Of The Holocaust?

1229 Words | 5 Pages

Nikitchenko 's action to oversee such crimes was very wrong. Now, in 1945 he was serving as a judge to condemn German Nazis for their wrongdoings even though he had witnessed and approved of the killing and torture of innocent citizens. This just contradicts the Nuremberg trial 's mission. The Nuremberg trials were meant to punish Germans and all those who had committed reprehensible acts during the war, but the Allies were not convicted for their crimes (Davenport 141). Because those charges against the Nazis were made following the crimes, it is suspicious that none of the crimes committed by the Allied powers were brought forward.

Read More

Execution Essay: The Nuremberg Trials During World War II

907 Words | 4 Pages

On December 17th 1942, leaders of United States, Britain and the Soviet Union issue the first joint declaration, declaring the mass murder of European Jews , promising to prosecute those who were responsible, for the extermination of a civilian population. By 1942 it was clear that the Allies had won the war. They had three options for how to treat the German war criminals; they could release them, execute them or put them on a trial; of which they chose to develop a trial. The Allied powers started developing the trial, with establishment of the International Military Tribune in December of 1942. The promise of trying those who were responsible for the mass extermination of a civilian population was fulfilled at the Nuremberg trials, in other words the Nazi trials, that began only six months after the ending of the Second World

Read More

Informative Essay On The Holocaust

823 Words | 4 Pages

The trials were for leaders of the nazi party that had committed war crimes. Representatives from the United States, Britain, The Soviet Union, and France made up the International Military that conducted the trials. In the Reichstag elections they got the right to vote. The deputy and the Reich Minister are acting in agreements. Although when you are half or partly jewish its very hard to try to vote.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of A Good Guard

164 Words | 1 Pages

The one factor that prevents a good guard from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards from this footage was the abuse of power. They weren’t actually trained to know what was right and what was wrong. They were force to this position without a choice. As this was mainly a test and when things went wrong they waited for the guards to solve things for themselves rather than the person who is testing them to come out and explain to them they are wrong and help them get back to the way they were told to act. As I didn’t see the documentary and what really lead to them to act that way, but the trailer the lady said “they are just boys” so they must have been treated badly for them to act this way.

Read More

Why Were The Nuremberg Trials Significant

826 Words | 4 Pages

Finally, the Nuremberg trials were so significant because many Nazi soldiers fled to foreign countries just to avoid the Nuremberg trials. A number of Nazi’s fled to foreign countries to avoid the trials and consequences which proves they were guilty, and that is significant because if you weren’t guilty, you would go to court. The leader of the Nazi party, Adolf Hitler, “was not tried because he had committed suicide prior to the end of the war, with some of his closest aides also killing themselves” (Donald). W). The syllable of the syllable.

Read More

The War Crime Trials

1631 Words | 7 Pages

The War Crime Trials conducted by the Allies following their victory over Axis powers in World War Two were clear manifestations of ‘Victors’ Justice’, a situation whereby the victors detain the prerogative to determine where justice lies and prosecute crimes committed accordingly. In short, it is an imposition of the victors’ law on the vanquished. The Allied nations defined a war crime, on this basis drew up the list of Nazi criminals they deemed to have committed this crime and subsequently charged them. The reasoning behind the labelling of the trials as ‘victors’ justice’ owes much to the disputation regarding the legality of the charges against the defendants and the practice of retroactive law, the subsequent legitimacy of the International

Read More

Judgment At Nuremberg Film Analysis

1868 Words | 8 Pages

The Nuremberg Trials began three years later after the most relevant Nazi authorities were convicted of war crimes for four judges, who took legal decisions that previewed sterilization policies and ethnic cleansing in Hitler 's Germany. Judgement at Nuremberg, based on the real Case Katzenberger, is a demonstration of the efforts of a judge at the tribunal to determine how the defendants, and even also the German themselves, could have been involved in the Holocaust’s atrocities. Judgment at Nuremberg is a representation of the first trial, that is mainly based on justice principles and international law, of the country leaders that pursued threatening battles and were involved in crimes against humanity. This film is an overview of real events that highlights the conflict between morality enclosing both the behaviour of the defendants and the process of providing them with justice (Teach With Movies, 2015). These processes offered the opportunity of enhancing the debate between positivism and natural law, highlighting that the position taken would have significant consequences

Read More

More about Medical Experiments And The Nuremberg Trials During The Holocaust

Related Topics

Open Document