Her husband was very mad his name was Curley. So since Curley was disturbed about his wife he wanted to execute Lennie. The next moment Curley had a gang ready to find Lennie, but only George knew where he was at. In conclusion George goes to Lennie and him before anyone else can hurt him. There is debate whether George slaughtered Lennie with justification or not.
In John Steinbeck's "Of Mice and Men”, Lennie and George travel together to work. They discuss the trouble they experience with Lennie's touching things he shouldn't and how that forces them to run, hide, and constantly search for work. Throughout the book, Steinbeck gives just a small picture of all the trouble Lennie has caused and how George continues to guide him to get by. A problem with a girl leads us to chapter 1 and 6, and how they share in setting, but George and Lennie's interactions differ. The similarities and differences of chapter 1 and 6 show how Lennie and George's cohesive friendship with a bright future develops into a loving bond that had to end.
This story (of mice and men) is about 2 friends that have been together for a long time. One friend is named George, George is like a big brother to the little brother named Lennie, Lennie is a little slow so he really doesn’t know what he really does. In this essay I'm going to be writing about whether or not students should be able to read Of Mice and Men based on the subject matter which is justified if George had a good reason in killing Lennie. I'm going to give my opinions on this book, so one reason you could have justified into George killing Lennie would be religion. If Lennie wanted to die then it would have been a reason and that reason is Euthanasia
One situation Lennie gets himself into is killing Curley’s wife, Curley gets very mad at Lennie for this and wants to kill him
Justified Death Of Mice and Men was an inspiring book about a couple of men just trying to get by in the Great Depression. George and Lennie had known each other for a very long time and had grown to depend on each other. The most controversial topic from this book was why George killed Lennie. It was the right thing to do for multiple reasons. One of the many reasons for george to kill George is that Lennie was a danger to those around him as well as himself.
Due to the inability to control his strength, Lennie accidentally breaks Curley’s Wife’s neck. George killed Lennie, because Curley would have killed him in a more painful way. Even though George meant well, he committed murder since he killed Lennie without his consent. Even though George meant to end Lennie’s suffering,
Some decisions you have to make in life are so difficult that we would rather not have to deal with them. George Milton had to decide the fate of his closest friend’s life. Lennie Small, a character from John Steinback’s book Of Mice and Men, is a childlike adult that George looks after. They were best friends until he accidentally killed the wife of their boss’s son. George had to decide whether or not he would kill Lennie mercifully, or let the rest of the worker's murder him.
According to debatewise.org 52 percent of people agree with mercy killings while 48 percent disagree. In the story Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, one of the main characters by the name of George fires the round of a Luger pistol into the back of his best friend’s head, Lennie Small. Without context, this would be seen as murder, as a crime. In this particular scenario, th George’s act was not murder, it was mercy.
What would be the feelings of one who had to shoot one close to them? Would it be remorse or guilt? How about the thoughts of justified killings; is there such a thing? Two people named George and Lennie are put in a situation like this. It involves a death, two actually.
There is one simple question many people ask when it comes to just about anything. Was this action justified? This question is asked everywhere, in court, in school, even in the home life, this question is asked everywhere. Mercy killings, are these killings justified? In the book “Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck one main character, George, kills his best friend.
Curley used this as an excuse to kill Lennie. He really wanted to kill Lennie because he destroyed his hand though. Curley said he was going to blow Lennie's guts out and make him suffer and be in pain. George prevented this by shooting Lennie in the back of the head and ending him quickly. George killed lennie because if he didn’t, Curley would have made him suffer.
Of Mice and Men is the story of the relationship between two men, George, and Lennie, a mentally handicapped man. The two men travel together, and although Lennie is sometimes a burden to him, George looks out for him and stays with him through trying times. The men are very close, but in the end, George kills Lennie to save him from the people chasing him. For George, this was a terrible thing to have to do, and a sacrifice on his part- he lost his best friend and had to live with the guilt of having killed him.
Is Killing Ever Justified Would you kill your best friend. Of course not it’s the person in your life that makes you happy. What if your best friend caused you trouble and lost you every job that you ever had. That might change your mind a little bit.
According to Christian beliefs, euthanasia is the same as getting an abortion, it’s sinful, and is considered murder. In this novella, Of Mice and Men by the well-known author John Steinbeck, a man named George kills his friend-a mentally slow man named Lennie in a so called act of euthanasia. In that, Lennie’s death by George is considered murder. Lennie absolutely loved life and didn’t intend to kill or hurt anyone, ultimately he was planning on “living off the fatta’ the land” with George and just living his own American Dream. Despite the ownership George felt towards Lennie, much like a dog and it’s master have a specific relationship, George had no right to kill Lennie.
Killing another seems very unjustifiable, which might be the case but when someone takes another 's life and sent to prison, death row or capital punishment is needed to put that person were they belong. People like that deserve to die because of their mistake of killing another and it deters other people to not kill others, showing them what would happen. In the case of Capital Punishment, Hunting for Sport, or George and Lennie, killing is a justifiable act. In the case of capital punishment killing is justified and needs to be done. For example, “Some crimes are so inherently evil they demand strict penalties up to and including death”(McClatchy).