Was George Justified for killing Lennie? George is not justified in killing Lennie, Lennie would have gone to court and gotten prison. The fact that Lennie was mentally disabled, would have changed his sentence, also George could've protected Lennie from Curly so that he would get a proper trial.
This story (of mice and men) is about 2 friends that have been together for a long time. One friend is named George, George is like a big brother to the little brother named Lennie, Lennie is a little slow so he really doesn’t know what he really does. In this essay I'm going to be writing about whether or not students should be able to read Of Mice and Men based on the subject matter which is justified if George had a good reason in killing Lennie. I'm going to give my opinions on this book, so one reason you could have justified into George killing Lennie would be religion. If Lennie wanted to die then it would have been a reason and that reason is Euthanasia
Justified Death Of Mice and Men was an inspiring book about a couple of men just trying to get by in the Great Depression. George and Lennie had known each other for a very long time and had grown to depend on each other. The most controversial topic from this book was why George killed Lennie. It was the right thing to do for multiple reasons. One of the many reasons for george to kill George is that Lennie was a danger to those around him as well as himself.
George killing Lennie and if it was justified or condemned is a very controversial discussion and could go either way. So think about these factors and ask yourself the question if what George did was justified or
George killing Lennie is justified. Lennie was either gonna get killed by the other men or George. The other men were only doing it because they hated Lennie, George would have done it for the sake of Lennie’s safety and mental state. George would have felt guilty if he did not handle it himself. One reason George was justified in killing Lennie was that George had realized Lennie would never get better and their dream would never come true.
He’s murdered mice, slain a puppy, and startled a woman by caressing her clothes. The most disastrous thing finally happens when he kills Curley’s wife. George was then faced with the decision to kill Lennie himself or have Curley and the other guys do it, which, in the end, he does himself. Was shooting Lennie justifiable, or should George have done something
When Lennies aunt died, George stuck with lennie forming the their rare friendship. He makes many unintended mistakes but is very nice and warm hearted man. Georges actions to Lennie are not justified because no one should ever kill their best friend, they had a chance to escape together, and Lennie may have gotten a consequence that was suitable. George shooting Lennie is not justifiable because Lennie & George have been traveling together for years despite the small incident in Weed.
Is Mercy Killing Merciful Have you ever wondered what it would be like to be fully paralyzed since you were born, of to become brain dead at age 10 and like your whole life doing nothing? Not much fun, so why would you let these people suffer. In the story of mice and men Lennie is somewhat like this, he doesn't register things in his head as well as others, and during during the great depression it was a horrible time for lennie to be alive. The story shows how mercy killing should be a thought for people whenever something bad happens to someone.
Is Killing Ever Justified Would you kill your best friend. Of course not it’s the person in your life that makes you happy. What if your best friend caused you trouble and lost you every job that you ever had. That might change your mind a little bit.
Some people might think in the opposite side that George should not killed Lennie because Lennie did not mean to anything. He has done it without knowing how strong of himself. Lennie made many troubles this might be because of his disability, but this is the reason that he deserves to live. He has done many thing that make George get into trouble and It is better if Lennie has to die because of George shoot him not the other. "All the time he coulda had such a good time if it was not for you” (Steinbeck).
On the other hand you can analyze the actions that George did and you can say that they were not very human decisions. George killed his best friend because Lennie killed a person and was going to get into more problems but nevertheless can not say that this is justified. George always told Lennie all the plans they had together, like buying a ranch, he was always keeping it with the expectation that they were going to stay together forever. This quote is an example of how Lennie and George looked happy in the future. "O.K. Someday- we 're gonna get the jack together and we 're gonna have a little house and a couple of acres an ' a cow and some pigs..." (Steinbeck 7).
Is someone a terrible person if they do something wrong to protect another? Would people still feel the same way if they found out that terrible thing was murder? John Steinbeck’s “Of Mice and Men” demonstrates a plot where George Milton has to shoot the person that has been by his side most of his life. When his best friend Lennie was always getting into trouble, George never failed to get them out of it. His whole life, he had to watch over Lennie and care for the both of them.
Killing another seems very unjustifiable, which might be the case but when someone takes another 's life and sent to prison, death row or capital punishment is needed to put that person were they belong. People like that deserve to die because of their mistake of killing another and it deters other people to not kill others, showing them what would happen. In the case of Capital Punishment, Hunting for Sport, or George and Lennie, killing is a justifiable act. In the case of capital punishment killing is justified and needs to be done. For example, “Some crimes are so inherently evil they demand strict penalties up to and including death”(McClatchy).
The author explores a variety of themes telling the story of George and Lennie, two agricultural field workers who are bound to each other but diametrically opposite in character. Lennie is a simple-minded man who is not in control of his strength,
The speech by Aung San Suu Kyi was made in the wake of the 8888 uprising, a violent outburst of bottled-up resentment towards the government after years of repressive, centralized, one-party rule. In her speech, Suu Kyi expresses her aims and intentions for the Burmese people, thus revealing the beliefs that guide her actions. Her speech can be seen as a rally to get the people to identify with her beliefs and unite them to fight alongside her. Her desire for a ‘multi-party democratic system of government’ within Burma is stated at the start.
