Milgram Experiment And Dr. Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Study

661 Words3 Pages

It is hard to comprehend the fact that many of us could actually abuse and even kill others, if given an order from superiors in certain circumstances. The Milgram Experiment proved this to be true, at least, to some extent. Additionally, recent findings suggest that the American Psychology Association (APA) supported and validated the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) torture program of detainees at Guantanamo Bay and other locations (Risen, 2015). Is this yet another example of individuals taking orders from superiors as well as exposing the corruption that exists in our government? Firstly, it is important understand why good people turn bad. Moral standards and social norms are established in childhood. These standards of a cuture sets the tone for …show more content…

Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Study, concluded that high percentages of people would cause harm to others if an authority figure persuaded them to do so. The Milgram experiment included an experimenter, teacher, and student. The teacher (participant) would say a word to the student and when the student answered incorrectly the teacher was told to shock them. Although most participants were reluctant to keep increasing the voltage of shocks when they felt the student was in real pain, a surprisingly two-thirds continued following the orders of the experimenter (ABC Primetime, 2007). It appears that all of us are capable of following an authority figures directions even if it causes pain to others or even death. If it is a matter of survival some of us would do it and others would be so traumatized that they would probably commit suicide due to the psychological effects that they suffered from. These studies make some sense as to why those in high ranking positions during the Holocaust followed directions of Adolf Eichmann (ABC Primetime, 2007). However, there were more factors to the Holocaust atrocities than just following directions; it included extreme hate as