ipl-logo

Morality And How They Are Aligned To Our Cultural Identity

601 Words3 Pages

Introduction
Morality is a guide or a system that distinguishes between right and wrong conduct. Moral theory is a structured set of statements that explain why certain actions are wrong and why people need to act in certain ways (Hampshire, 1977). In this paper am going to examine how various theories view morality and how they are aligned to our cultural identity.
1) Virtue ethics
This theory was championed by Aristotle who argued that right or wrong was determined in accordance with traditional virtues, that is making good person. The theory did not dwell so much on moral duty but the central concern was excellence of character and what makes human beings happy. True happiness was derived from fulfillment and self-actualization and therefore …show more content…

This theory was championed by John Stuart Mill who said that all actions lead to an end and there is a highest good end. Furthermore there is a first Principle of Morals that is called The Greatest Happiness Principle’ (GHP) that strives to working towards the greatest happiness. GHP implies that people should act so as to maximize human welfare by choosing actions that minimize suffering and maximize pleasure.
According to Arthur (2003), Utilitarian believe no actions that can be stated with certainty as wrong or right, no persons’ preferences are more important than other persons’ interests. Utilitarianism is well reflected in democratic and economic principles. This theory no longer conforms to our culture in our modern society because people are more concerned with self-interests and motives rather than act as per the greater society’s welfare. This is also contributed by our leaders who don’t care of subject’s welfare but rather enriching themselves.
3) Kantian theory
The theory was championed by Kant, who believed that rationality determined right and wrong. It stated that good and evil are assessed in terms of duty/law/ obligation and Kant thought that acting morally was simple because you ought to perform your duty (Arthur,

Show More
Related

Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons

1079 Words | 5 Pages

The first principle of Utilitarianism is Utility. In John Stuart Mill’s text discussing his theory on Utilitarianism, he defines Utility as pleasure itself. “Every writer, from Epicurus to Bentham, who maintained the theory of utility, meant by it, not something to be contradistinguished from pleasure, but pleasure itself, together with the exemption from pain” (John Stuart Mill, 997). Another name for the theory of Utility is the Greatest Happiness Principle, which

Read More

Groundwork For The Metaphysics Of Morals By Immanuel Kant

1433 Words | 6 Pages

He beings by asserting, “nothing in the world … can possibly be conceived that could be called ‘good’ without qualification except a good will.” Kant continues to list many qualities – such as intelligence and courage – that one might argue to be good but are not because they are dependent upon some secondary motivation or the possible outcomes that could arise rather than the intrinsic goodness of the action. The distinction lies in the notion that even if a good will never produces the desired product of happiness, it will always be considered good. Conjointly, he declares the obligations of a good will as duties, essentially meaning that our moral responsibility is an obligation to others. He continues by outlining three propositions of morality, and “the third proposition – a consequence of the first two,” asserts that, “to have a duty is to be required to act in a certain way out of respect for law.”

Read More

Utilitarianism Evaluation Paper

611 Words | 3 Pages

Utilitarianism is one of the best-known theory under the consequentialism, and its idea is the Greatest Happiness Principle(GHP). According to the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Utilitarian believe that the purpose of morality is to

Read More

Virtue Ethics: An Aristotelian Approach

2124 Words | 9 Pages

Virtue ethics, primarily founded by Aristotle, was the dominant approach in Western moral philosophy until Enlightenment [1].Its importance re-emerged with the dissatisfaction associated with deontology and utilitarianism, two theories unable to address issues such as moral character, moral education, friendship etc. Virtue ethics emphasize moral character and virtues, focusing on three central concepts: virtue, practical wisdom and eudaimonia. Cultural Relativism is the view that holds that moral truths cannot be applied universally, and that each person should be morally assessed based on his culture/society. This paper discusses relativist objection faced by Aristotle, its arguments and the responses offered by Aristotle, in addition to anticipated objections and Nussbaum’s responses in her paper “Non-relative virtues: An Aristotelian Approach”

Read More

Comparing Kant's Outlook On Happiness And Morality

817 Words | 4 Pages

In relation to how happiness affects the longevity of morality, Kant’s theory clearly looks to separate the two, and show a distinction that will show that if happiness is seen as having a connection with morality; it could cause the end of morality. Though Aristotle proposes a lengthy argument on how happiness is the basis for morality, his argument is dated and fails whereas Kant’s does not. When comparing the two arguments it will show why Kant’s outlook on happiness and morality is the correct view one should take, and how Aristotle’s own short coming further reinforce the consequences of connecting happiness with morality, in that the prior will destroy the latter. Before going in further, one must look at what is happiness to Kant. Happiness,

Read More

Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Virtue Ethics)

1026 Words | 5 Pages

Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Virtue Ethics) In this ethical theory, Aristotle stresses that all activities that humans make, aim to come to an ends that we consider to be good. Most of the activities are the means to an even higher end. The highest human good that we aim for is happiness, which is done for our own personal sake. It is said that one will attain happiness by leading a virtuous life, developing reason, and theoretical wisdom.

Read More

Comparing Utilitarianism And The Virtue Theory

590 Words | 3 Pages

Ethical theories are schools of thought that attempt to a provide comprehensive systems for discerning between what is “right” and “wrong” and defining what exactly constitutes morality. Two widely spread but differing systems are Utilitarianism and the Virtue Theory. The frames of thought are similar in that they both make an effort to distinguish what is ethical by taking into account what benefits the greater good. Utilitarianism, however, places value on what consequences individual actions yield, while the virtue theory concentrates on virtues and character traits. Utilitarianism are the virtue theory are ethics of conduct and ethics of character, respectively.

Read More

Mill Utilitarianism Essay

552 Words | 3 Pages

Mill’s theory of Utilitarianism states that “An action is right if and only if it produces the greatest balance of pleasure over pain after taking everyone affected into consideration.” Therefore, an action is morality right in proportion as it tends to promote happiness and morality and wrong if it produces the reverse. For Mill is order to reach happiness, pleasure has to me maximize and pain has to be minimize. His view is very similar to the Epicureans, however, Mills goes on with this idea further. Mill claims that molality means the promotion of the greatest happiness to a greatest number of people in society.

Read More

Thesis Statement: Origin Of Morality: Religion And Philosophy

1634 Words | 7 Pages

3. What does Philosophy say about morality? 4. Are they alike? Introduction Morality has long been used by human being as a basis for their actions.

Read More

Comparison Of Utilitarianism And The Greatest Happiness Principle

629 Words | 3 Pages

Utilitarianism and The Greatest Happiness Principle Utilitarianism is grounded in the reality that all desires we have boil down to pleasure, and freedom from pain. All other things we desire, are extensions of these base desires. As John Stuart Mill states in his book entitled "Utilitarianism;" "The only proof capable of being given that an object is visible, is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible, is that people hear it... In like manner, I apprehend, the sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable, is that people do actually desire it."

Read More

Kant And Mill Similarities

1385 Words | 6 Pages

Evaluating the morality within ourselves they evaluate morality on the principle of what is wrong or right. As equally

Read More

Essay On Divine Command Theory

1218 Words | 5 Pages

The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

Read More

Adolf Eichmann And Kant's Ethical Theory

740 Words | 3 Pages

In Itself states that people should act in a certain way that you always treat humanity and always consider them as an end but never as mere means. This moral theory opposes to Utilitarianism, which supports the “greatest happiness principle”. According to “greatest happiness principle” people ought to act in such a way that produce the greatest amount of happiness for the

Read More

Virtue Vs Utilitarianism

995 Words | 4 Pages

This theory highlights the role of one’s character and virtues for determining ethical behavior. According to Aristotle, the importance is on being rather than doing

Read More

Utilitarianism In Business Ethics

1685 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory based on the idea that an action is moral if it causes the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. The theory is concerned with predicted consequences or outcomes of a situation rather than focusing on what is done to get to the outcome. There are many forms of utilitarianism, having been introduced by Jeremy Bentham (act utilitarianism), and later being updated by scholars such as J.S. Mill (rule utilitarianism) and Peter Singer (preference utilitarianism). When referring to issues of business ethics, utilitarianism can allow companies to decide what to do in a given situation based on a simple calculation. Many people would agree that this idea of promoting goodness

Read More

More about Morality And How They Are Aligned To Our Cultural Identity

Related Topics

Open Document