Morality Vs. Savagery In Shakespeare's Hamlet

833 Words4 Pages

Shakespeare's play Hamlet is a collective piece of internal and external conflict. From the moment we meet the crestfallen prince we are enraptured by his elegant intensity. Acting blindly through his anger and emotions, Hamlet takes on the responsibility of avenging his father's death and maintaining his role as the Prince of Denmark. His unwavering desire for vengeance drives the plot and sets the tone for a compelling story of morality vs. savagery. Shakespeare utilizes the reoccurring themes of revenge, deceit, and violence to take us on Hamlets continuous search for happiness, love and answers. The characters he encounters as well as the mental and physical battles he faces help illuminate the vengeful characteristics of this tragedy. …show more content…

He is reckless yet cautious, courteous yet uncivil, tender yet ferocious. Hamlets life involves loads of tragedies, poisons, swords, and suicides, including the death of his father, mother's incestuous marriage madness, and his own death at the end. When Hamlet exclaims, "that it should come to this," he'd just finished describing how the world has gone to fodder. Then Hamlet goes on to say how he cannot believe his mother would marry her husband's brother. This quote shows Hamlet's fury and shock at his mother's remarriage. He uses innocent Ophelia is now an outlet for his irritation towards the queen not realizing that his vicious words have caused her to go insane. It is unfortunate that the actions of Claudius and Queen Gertrude have tainted the way Hamlet's thinks and feels now towards women. Coming from the letters and gifts Hamlet gave the woman he once loved , it is obvious that he did love the girl, and likely felt those feelings of sweet devotion that his father felt had once for this mother. The recognition of his love for Ophelia can only come when Hamlet realizes that she is dead, and free from her tainted womanly

More about Morality Vs. Savagery In Shakespeare's Hamlet