ipl-logo

Mount Everest Simulation Paper

1434 Words6 Pages

The Mount Everest Simulation is an effected method to help individuals understand the concepts of group dynamics and leadership. In order to successfully climb to the mountain summit, team members must work together while maintaining good health and time. This is done by efficiently dealing with supplies and using the information provided to ascend to the next camp level (Roberto, 2015). Although my group did not successfully reach the mountains summit, I do believe we had many positive strategies that contributed to our team’s effectiveness. We began by reviewing our player profiles. By embracing the positions that we were assigned, we became experts on our topics which expanded our knowledge as a group. Therefore, by each individual taking on their role and responsibilities, we were able to make effective decisions. There were five roles assigned. One specific group member stood …show more content…

The main factor that may have affected our group and its overall unsuccessful journey to the summit is groupthink, which is decision making unconsciously influenced by other group members (Loughead, 2015b). Having just met our group members for the very first time, it was surprising how our team interacted with everyone, communicating and sharing their opinions freely. There was no one sitting there is silence or what appeared to be just agreeing with every decision. However, I wonder if the knowledge of how important and dangerous this journey was unconsciously prevented members from expressing their true thoughts or options in order to maintain our group cohesiveness and minimalize conflict. As a group, we collectively made decisions through discussion and problem solving. Even though our decisions were something we all agreed on, we still made wrong decisions along the

Show More
Related
396 Words | 2 Pages

In many cases, people will set aside their own personal credence or adopt the opinions of the rest of the group. Groupthink occurs when the pressures are high to conform within an organization interferes with the group 's’ analysis to reach a decision limiting independent thinking. There are eight symptoms of Groupthink that include the following, illusion of invulnerability, rationalization, brief in inherent morality, out-group stereotypes, self-censorship, illusion of unanimity, direct pressure on dissenters, and self-appointed mindguards . A historical example of Groupthink is the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster.

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

Seventeen years ago many decision went wrong and many right. It is not always that the decisions we make can go

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

They can also feel pressured by group members. Both of these factors can lead to making the wrong decision in certain situations. For example, “I think it’s important we decided not to help him. Everyone, like myself, was probably on the verge of fetching a rope, or asking where we could find a ladder, but then we looked around at each other and it was decided. I don't remember if we told ourselves a reason why we couldn’t help him, but we had decided then.”

Read More
1713 Words | 7 Pages

There are many ways in which group dynamics resonate in this film. Group work can foster connections and provide an opportunity /for group members to feel bonded. The Titans football team is a task group; the ultimate role of the group is to have the players come together as one unit. However, there are critical group dynamics that threaten the team’s ability to function properly.

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

In order to run a successful organization, especially a good standing Army, there needs to be quality leaders within the organization. Leaders are artists, remaining flexible and adaptable in order to conform to any certain situation. In FM 6-22, leadership is defined as, “the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improve the organization”. The vast majority of successful Army leaders exemplify this definition in their everyday life. So, what exactly does this process involve?

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Have you ever been part of a team that made a terrible decision? You may have been part of a groupthink event. Groupthink is a term coined by Psychologist Irving Janis. He determined cohesive groups try to maintain unanimity rather than utilize all data to make a good decision (Whyte, 2000). Some historic examples of groupthink are the attack on Pearl Harbor, Iranian hostage rescue attempt, and the Holocaust.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

It is a natural human instinct to want to be acknowledge by your peers, yet it is also important to be a critical thinker. Irving Janis in 1972 created the term groupthink. He believed groupthink occurs inside a group of similar people that want to keep from being different, resulting in incoherent decision-making. The 1957 film "12 Angry Men," uses groupthink, which influenced the verdict vote in the case of a teenager accused of murdering his father. The purpose of this essay is to examine groupthink and to represent Dr. Irving Janis’ symptoms of groupthink in the film.

Read More
1535 Words | 7 Pages

Group think According to Janis, who coined the term; groupthink “occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment” (1972, p. 9) further group think often leads to a decrease in the mental efficacy perception of reality and moral judgement, as personages find themselves in a group system that seeks high cohesion and unanimity which delimits the motivation of the individual to realistically appraise alternate courses of action (Janis, 1972). A common trait of a collective experiencing this phenomenon, is an inclination to take irrational decision making in addition to members of the group being similar in background and further being insulated from external insight. Comparably the singularity of groupthink is present in the film 12 Angry Men, and appears anecdotally, early on the film, present in the expected unanimous vote of ‘guilty,’ that will send the defendant to the electric chair. Invulnerability Literature surrounding the concept of group think is greatly rooted in the writings of Janis.

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

Psychologist Irving Janis explained some alarmingly bad decisions made by governments and businesses coined the term "groupthink”, which he called "fiascoes.” He was particularly drawn to situations where group pressure seemed to result in a fundamental failure to think. Therefore, Janis further analyzed that it is a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members ' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. According to Janis, groupthink is referred as the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups.

Read More
1632 Words | 7 Pages

DYNAMICS OF GROUP BEHAVIOUR Case Analysis: TerraCog Global Positioning Systems Section B | Group 1 Name Roll Number Aditi Bhandakkar 2015073 Animesh Khare 2015081 Anshuman Thakur 2015085 Ketan Khandelwal 2015098 Tanay Mahajan 2015100 Shital Gupta 2015115 Vibha Haldwal 2015127 INTRODUCTION “TerraCog Global Positioning Systems” case focuses on the Conflict and Communication aspect of the group dynamics of an organization. The case showcases various scenarios wherein major emphasis is on group communication amongst different teams and the conflicts that arise within a group of people comprised of different team representatives and executive heads.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction: Mountain Everest simulation is design on leadership. This simulation represent different series of problem solving and decision making challenges for team and how a team make the tough decisions based on different information. Specially when all team members have partially conflict goals. Answer 1: Whole team character in terms of interpersonal communication was on managerial level.

Read More
1156 Words | 5 Pages

The membership composition includes, chairperson, deputy chairperson, Head of training, Head of administration and the rest were members. I was the deputy chairperson and my role includes co-facilitating meetings, planning along with organising camps and training. Assessment of Group Dynamics- Part (a) The four dimensions of group dynamics are vital for understanding and working effectively with all types of group.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

Many mountain climbers risk their own lives and rescuers ' when they try to climb Mount Everest, the highest mountain in the world. When something goes wrong during their climb, they demand rescue services to help them. Already, there are a large vast of people who have died in the process that perhaps 200 dead bodies still remain on the mountain. Although, 4,000 other people have successfully scaled the mountain which is a good amount. But, since helicopters are increasing because of the several people the rescuers have to save, more money are getting spent.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

In essence, teamwork can be defined as a group of people working in the same direction and for a common purpose. Teamwork requires individuals be a team player and to be able to work well with others; after all, there is no “I” in “Team”! As with any endeavour, we faced some initial setbacks. With this being our first college team assignment, we were all treading on unfamiliar territory.

Read More
808 Words | 4 Pages

But if it comes only as a result of people holding back their opinions and honest concerns, then it’s a bad thing.” Dysfunction #3: Lack of Commitment When teams engage in productive conflict they can confidently commit and buy-in to decisions. What separates a productive team and one that is not is that, the productive team is able to make clear decisions and are confident that every one of their members are in favour of that decision. It is common for people to have the mindset to not be committed to something when they know their opinions and thoughts are neglected and excluded from the discussion. Having commitment in a team is more about making sure that every members’ opinions are heard and acknowledged rather than just having everybody’s consensus.

Read More

More about Mount Everest Simulation Paper

Related Topics

Open Document