In this excerpt from Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein, she discusses the complexities of Victor Frankenstein’s relationship with his creation, the creature. Ultimately, in this excerpt, Shelley illustrates the difficulties a person may encounter when faced with the consequences of their actions because they allowed their pride and ego to get the best of them. The complexity of Victor and the creature’s relationship is conveyed through Shelley’s specific detail and diction. Throughout this excerpt, the creature is horridly described in specific detail as a supernatural human that terrorizes Victor and his loved ones. Victor describes the reunion of him and the creature for the first time since the abandonment.
The book Frankenstein written by Mary Shelly is a novel about a young science student. Victor Frankenstein grafted body parts of different people together and creates a grotesque Creature. After Victor brought it to life, after he got scared of what he had created he neglected it and left it alone. The Creature made its own way in the world and got rejected many times. The society failed the creature in many different ways as Victor does not treat the creature as a living being, it gets rejected by the people and it is being left alone, it made it miserable and to the evil it is by the end of the book.
Nature vs. nurture has been an ongoing argument throughout history between scientists and philosophers alike and is still being debated today. During the romantic period of literature, most romantics fell to the nurture side of the argument because they believed that a human’s well-being depended on how they had been treated by their parents, or lack thereof. While science might suggest that people are born with ethical abilities from nature alone, Mary Shelley alludes through her novel, “Frankenstein,” and proves through her own life why all people must be nurtured by loving influences to ensure happiness. As Mary Shelley’s, “Frankenstein” was really a way for her to express her lonely and neglected childhood, it shows how her abandonment
The nature vs. nurture debate has been a topic of great interest, exploring the factors that shape an individual's behavior and development. Mary Shelley's novel, "Frankenstein," delves into this debate through the captivating story of Victor Frankenstein and his creation, the creature. This essay argues that the creature’s behavior and development are significantly influenced by his surroundings, interactions with humans, the absence of a nurturing figure, and the role of education. By examining evidence from the novel itself and credible online sources, we can gain insight into the interplay between nature and nurture in the creature’s journey.
In Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein,” the timeless debate of nature and nurture takes center stage through the character of Victor Frankenstein’s creation. While the novel at its roots is a gothic horror mixed with scientific ambition, it also shows what truly shapes an individual’s identity and behavior. Through the plight of the monster, Shelly wants readers to contemplate the extent to which inherent qualities versus environmental influences determine one’s destiny. “Frankenstein argues that while inherent traits may play a role in shaping a person, it is ultimately the nurturing or lack thereof, and the environment that significantly molds an individual’s actions and ultimate fate. Victor Frankenstein’s abandonment of his creation immediately
Frankenstein Essay Tanu Pendeti In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the protagonist, Victor Frankenstein, is portrayed as a mad scientist consumed by ambition. Following the death of his beloved mother, he seeks to create an invincible human being, one not plagued by ill health or a facile death. As the novel progresses, his fixation intensifies, leading to the creation of a creature through unethical means. Exhausted and taken aback by the unusual appearance of the creature he had just brought to life, Frankenstein forsakes his creation, which ultimately results in great suffering, and agony for both of them in the times to come. The author depicts the repercussions they both faced due to Frankenstein’s infatuation of creating a creature by
The nature versus nurture debate dates back to 1869 with Francis Galton who argued nature and John Locke who argued nurture. The concept of this debate is to determine what shapes a man's personality. Are we born with all of our characteristics and our personalities, with little room to change or does our environment shape our personalities? Many philosophers have grappled with this debate, as well as authors. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, she consistently explains that the creature's behavior is due to nurture - or lack thereof.
Frankenstein, a novel by Mary Shelley, is an excellent representation of literature work which shows how past events can affect positively or negatively, the present activities, attitudes, or values of a character. In Frankenstein both Victor and the creature experience life changing events early in the novel, because of this their attitudes on life change. By nature, a being is born with a kind, gentle, benevolent, and innocent ‘soul.’ However, it is through the subjective experiences where one’s soul can become tainted by society. Throughout the novel, the creature receives the most character development.
The monstrosity of human nature is implied by Mary Shelley throughout the whole novel, which inspires us to think deeply about the meaning of ugliness, both external and internal. One major theme that pertains to the development of a being’s behavior and its relation to monstrosity is nature versus nurture. The two main characters of the novel, Victor Frankenstein and the creature, have an inborn nature that regulates their physical and behavioral traits; however, Frankenstein’s and the monster’s nurturing styles are completely different. How do nature and nurture affect their characters? Was it nature or nurture that made them monster vicious and ruthless and Victor greedy and selfish?
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is a cultural critique that explores the dangers of science and technology, the limitations of human knowledge and understanding, and the negative consequences of societal norms and prejudices on the individual and society. This is a story about a young scientist, who spent months of his life working on an experiment that turned out to be wretched, and soon would lead to Victor’s downfall. Frankenstein is the karma that endures upon Victor as a result of this scientist breaking the rules of science and nature. Victor wanted to find his life’s meaning by creating a monster, and wanted to be seen as a God for constructing the monster he made. Frankenstein was created by a miracle, it had the mind of a human inside
The idea of whether the genetic makeup of a human or the circumstance in which they were brought into affects how they are has been a topic of discussion for as long as psychologists can remember. One may research for days, months, even years, and never truly find the real answer to the age old question. There is an abundance of evidence that supports both sides, only making it harder for experts to understand or even begin to form an answer. What we do know is that it may vary from person to person. In no way are we able to, at least not now, generalize the origin of the behavior of our society.
Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley, is a novel that explores to answer the questions that many philosophers have pondered upon. This book is mostly famous for the richness of ideas it asks mankind to confront—how the uneducated and deprived people are treated, how knowledge could be used for good and evil, and how the influence of technology affects mankind. The novel is about Victor Frankenstein, who is a young, talented scientist obsessed with discovering the secret of creating life. While studying in a university, he works alone in his apartment and creates a living being by recycling old body part from deceased people. At first, the creature created seems gentle and harmless, but because of its grotesque appearance, he is forced to hide away from civilization.
Maxwell Fallert 4/6/2023 Uhlman 2nd The novel Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley in 1818, has continued to captivate audiences with its complex portrayal of human emotions, ethics, and the consequences of playing with the limits of science. The story revolves around Victor Frankenstein, a young scientist who, in his pursuit of knowledge, creates a grotesque creature that, in turn, unleashes a series of tragic events. By employing the lens of existentialism, a philosophical movement that explores the meaning of existence and the human condition, this paper aims to analyze Frankenstein and uncover the novel's deeper insights into the human experience. Through the characters of Victor Frankenstein and his creation, the creature,
The nature vs. nurture debate is a philosophical, scientific, and cultural, debate about what causes an individual’s actions, personality, and most importantly their behavioral traits. Nature can be defined as someone’s influence from genetic behaviors, while nurture is caused by someones environment and experience. Nature is how a person acts based on their genetic inheritance and some other biological factors, they have been proven to be an important factor in the development of many mental health conditions such as depression and being bipolar. Whereas nurture affect those mental health conditions where a person develops that illness depending on their environment. Frankenstein can be seen as a prime example of the Nature versus Nurture
Born out of Romantic ideals, the work of Mary Shelley shares how the human experience was viewed during the 1800s. More interestingly, the view that was most expressed was how individuals are corrupted by society. Shelley’s use of character to convey the parallels in the supposed monstrous nature of the Creation and human nature can be seen throughout the entirety of the book. With this in mind, readers of Frankenstein should view the Creation as human because he was created with human qualities such as being emotional, having judgement, and being pure.
