ipl-logo

Net Neutrality Speech

856 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Internet and privacy

Intro:
In the era of Obama, net neutrality rules were set to provide a free and fair internet experience to everyone [6]. Net neutrality is the concept of making all content on the internet available to people at the same speed [1]. However, 3 years later, those laws are now being threatened to be revoked by the Federal Communications Commission(FCC), a US agency that regulates the internet and other technologies to make sure that they are being used fairly [5],[7]. Since then, there has been a lot of controversies regarding Net neutrality due to the recent decision made by the FCC to end it [3].

Thesis Statements: Although the decision to end net neutrality has already been made, some people are still arguing whether ending net neutrality was the right decision. Some people claim that it was the right …show more content…

Without net neutrality, internet providers can make consumers pay to access certain content. For example, internet providers can make YouTube accessible only if consumers pay $9.99 a month. With this restriction, people who can’t afford it will be denied from accessing YouTube, thus the freedom of internet to those consumers will ultimately be violated.

b. Having our freedom of the internet violated will indirectly affect our freedom of speech and information. As stated above, having our freedom of information violated will result in the public being kept in the about issues happening around the world, but there is a bigger problem that arises. With our freedom of speech on the internet taken away, this will prevent people from spreading awareness about this catastrophe happening to people who do not have access to the internet. Due to this loss of information, this will widen the gap between the public and the group of people who are hostage to the catastrophe. There would be no information leaked to the public about the catastrophic event, therefore making it impossible for it to be

Show More
Related
254 Words | 2 Pages

I referred to unit 7’s discussion post where you outlined your essay. So far your research has proven to make for an interesting essay. I’m sorry I did not find a persuasive thesis statement in Unit 8 though, meaning I’m not convinced that there should be a policy change. I know you stated this is a working thesis statement which was not included in unit 8’s post. If you don’t mind, I would like to give some guidance.

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

"The first amendment, which gives people the freedom of religion, press, and speech, is something taken for granted by Americans. Throughout history, free speech has been both limited and stretched by the government. The first amendment, which gives people the freedom of religion, press, and speech, is something taken for granted by Americans. Thus, the government should have the ability to monitor and control the government, but only to the extent of protecting the country against potential threats.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

With the world population being 7,259,902,243 people, a grossly huge amount of people use the Internet, the number being 3,366,261,156 people worldwide. That ends up being almost half of the population, the percentage being 46.4% I one hundred percent disagree with the “decision” of the government ridding of the Internet entirely, as if that isn't clear enough already. Though the government might find the termination of the Internet useful in some circumstances, I have no doubt that it may result in riots, violence, protests, and more in order to get it

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

For example, throughout the article, Sahakian continually reminds the reader that net neutrality is essential in keeping the internet fair, open, and equal for all people who use it. He also expresses his thoughts about how net neutrality affects his area of education and the consequences that could happen if net neutrality is repealed. Also, Sahakian frequently amplifies and strengthens the issue with repealing net neutrality throughout the whole article because in his opinion, ending net neutrality is a big mistake, and it is up to the people to help stop this mistake from happening

Read More
1621 Words | 7 Pages

In 1988, the Internet was opened to the public. At that time, not many people were aware of what a huge impact the Internet would have on the lives of future generations and cultures. While it was at first widely accepted by many users because of its astonishingly convenient and unlimited access to information, the enthusiasm for the Internet has more recently diminished and even disappeared in some cases. Many people no longer view the Internet as a helpful tool, but more as a harmful weapon, attacking every area of our lives, including education, communication, literacy, attention span, memory, intelligence, relationships, politics, economics, even sleep, diet, and physical activity. The Internet is ultimately affecting and determining the

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

For example, let's say that a large search engine corporation had a lot of spare money in the bank from advertising, and it decided to pay ISP's to give their traffic preferential treatment over a different website, such as a non profit like Wikipedia. That situation would not be fair in my mind, because a corporation uses its power to disproportionately gain an advantage in performance that is not justifiable. A core principle of the internet is being allowed to exercise one's freedom of speech. There should be no reason that someone who is acting within their constitutional right should be denied the opportunity to share their viewpoint in any way that they choose (2).

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

Mood- the emotional feel of a piece of literature. Ex.1: “Charles Dickens creates a calm and peaceful mood in his novel “Pickwick Papers”: “The river, reflecting the clear blue of the sky, glistened and sparkled as it flowed noiselessly on” (Literary Devices).” Ex.2: Examples of mood; Calm, cheerful, content. Uses: An author uses mood in their literature to get emotional responses from readers and get emotional attachment to the literary piece they read.

Read More
1470 Words | 6 Pages

People may say it’s eliminates our freedom of speech, but some people take advantage of that freedom and should have at least some limitation for what is said on the internet. According to David French, from the National Review, he states,“...freedom of speech does not mean a blanket permission to say anything...it means balancing the inherent value of a given view with the obligation to ensure that other members of a given community can participate”(French). In other words, everyone should express their opinion but in a mannerly style, and that all points of view should be apprehended for everyone’s individual opinion. Censorship’s part in our society is to protect the minds of the public to prevent the violent and traumatization it can

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

Negative: There are also negative sides when it comes to freedom of speech. Then the word “abuse” comes in. Some people use internet to abuse freedom of speech, anonymously. One could write everything one would without begin identified.

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

Starting with pro, I believe that freedom of speech allows people to enable the right to express about personal thoughts, such as expressing your personal opinion on a political debate, or expressing your opinion in a public or campus riot. According to Visionlaunch.com, they state that “this concept allows a person to have the freedom of expressing their public opinion and their thoughts, without the worry of getting fines or jail time even if people don’t agree with you”. How would this impact or affect the people around the world? Well, this would not impact anybody because expressing your opinion on a

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

NET NEUTRALITY: Net Neutrality is also known as Open Internet and Internet Neutrality. Net neutrality is the principle that to treat all the data on the internet in same way by Internet Service Providers (ISP) not discriminate or changing differently by users, applications, and websites. OPEN INTERNET: The idea of an open internet is that all the resources of the internet to operate it easily by each individual and companies; this includes ideas like net neutrality and transparency.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

2. Disadvantages of regulations/censorship 2.1 compromising the freedom of speech Censorship compromises the freedom of speech in many different ways. Freedom of speech refers to the right to speak without censorship or being restraint by a higher authority of the organization or country. For example, Compromising the freedom of speech will not allow the society to voice out their negative thoughts or to protest at a government or a government-related event. This example clearly shows that freedom of speech is being compromised as people are unable to voice out what they truly feel and are mostly forced to keep their opinions to themselves as voicing these opinions will make the rest of the society think in a different way and steer them away to generate other ideas or thoughts.

Read More
1589 Words | 7 Pages

An enormous reason why people have become reliant and/or addicted to the Internet is the result of the constant need to use their social media. Humans have created an unrealistic view of what the Internet should be, compared to what it actually consists of in real life. The Internet has numerous amounts of positive impacts on lives; however, it additionally has negatively taken control of each individual’s life. According to Dictionary.com the definition of the Internet is, “A vast computer network linking smaller computer networks worldwide (usually preceded by the).

Read More
1040 Words | 5 Pages

George Washington once said,"the freedom of Speech may be taken away—and, dumb & silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter.” This shows that if freedom is taken away, specifically freedom of speech, the people will feel lost and confused in their country. They would feel as if the did not have a say in the countries

Read More

More about Net Neutrality Speech

Related Topics

Open Document