ipl-logo

New Deal Argumentative Analysis

1695 Words7 Pages

What are contrasting perspectives of actions? Robert Collier describes opposing views as “One might as well try to ride two horse moving in different directions, as to try to maintain in equal force two opposing or contradictory set of desires.” These actions that America takes to form a better nation, since the reconstruction era until the present day, results in two different reactions: one against and the other one in support. For example, opposing views appear in the New Deal. The New Deal meant to help Americans during the Great Depression had supporters as well as opponents. Another example of contrasting thinking in America was progressivism and conservatism. Progressives believed in the idea that the government should be part of …show more content…

The Securities and Exchange Commission or the SEC was an organization designed to protect investors by maintaining a fair market. However, this resulted in many businesses to dislike the New Deal. The SEC resulted in two contrasting perceptions, one was that the government is taking too much control, and the other is the government is controlling just as much as it should. These two conflicting ideas are known as Conservatism and progressivism. Progressivism brought many key ideas and movements to form a better union. In the New Deal, FDR implemented many acts and organizations which prove to be an important factor in helping America overcome the Great Depression. During the first hundred days after FDR took office, progressive acts prevailed, mainly through the organizations he set up and the bank plan he implemented. Through these two major acts the government was able to help the population during times of need. However, the many bureaucratic organizations that formed due to the New Deal resulted in people to despise big government. Furthermore, these oppositions to big government gained momentum with Ronald Reagan’s election. In the Carter and Reagan debates, Reagan claimed “But as governor, when I was at that end of the line and receiving some of those grants for Government programs, I saw that so many of them were a dead end.” The New Deal as a whole …show more content…

The campaign for racial equality of whites and blacks have been proven through many of the Civil Rights movement. One such instance where the two contrasting beliefs about race equality became more obvious was during the Brown v Board of Education. In this case the Supreme Court had repealed the decision made in the Plessy v Ferguson case, saying that it is impossible for African Americans to be treated “separate but equal” in public schools, and therefore African Americans are deprived of protection from the law. Many of the schools accepted the decision made by the Supreme Court, others still continued to segregate schools based on race. Many Southerners believed that the Brown v Board of Education case is unconstitutional and declared to allow segregation in public education. In the distinct perspectives of both southern politicians and Civil rights advocates about race and education, resulted in two different visions on a decision meant to insure the rights of African

Show More
Related
1022 Words | 5 Pages

The students of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical College (A&T), embarked on a new journey on February 1st, 1960. In the city of Greensboro, the college students decided they would go to a lunch counter (segregated for only Whites) and ask for service. This act of Civil Rights Movement, following after the Brown v. Board of Education case, was the start of something new for African Americans. The college students inspired others to form their own sit-ins and they inspired the start of new organizations such as Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). In general, the students of the Greensboro sit-in both continued and started their own form of a Civil Rights Movement.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The programs created by the New Deal satisfied the needs of citizens, even though several thought Roosevelt was overstepping his power. Roosevelt’s administration was not very effective in ending the Great Depression, however, some of the programs did help relieve

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

The differences between political parties today could be compared to the contrast between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Despite the different beliefs and goals for the country,

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

During President Roosevelt’s term (1933-1945) we could see definite examples of growth in government and economy. A lot of this growth is due to the creation and implementation of the New Deal. We can’t say that the New Deal didn’t do well for America and its citizens, it was a success in restoring public confidence and creating new programs that brought relief to millions of Americans. It offered short-term relief and long-term structural reform and increased the role of the government in American society, creating for the first time a government committed to providing individual citizens with a measure of security against the unpredictable turns of the

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

The longest and most dreadful downturn in economic history tossed millions of the hardworking people of America into poverty, for more than a decade neither the federal government or the free market were able to restore themselves from prosperity. Due to the Great Depression, an impetus was provided for President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal, this deal would forever change the relationship between the government and the American people. The New Deal was considered to be one of the most remarkable times of political reform in American history. In hindsight, it began to become easier to view the New Deal as the essential response to the Depression. However, the New Deal at the time was only one of the countless possible responses to an American capitalist system that had professedly lost its way.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More
1944 Words | 8 Pages

Beginning with President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s inauguration in 1933, the New Deal was passed in the context of reformism and rationalism as the United States proceeded through the Great Depression. The American people looked to the President to instill reform policies to help direct the country out of an economic depression, and thus often sought to abandon the society that existed before the Great Depression. Roosevelt instituted New Deal policies to attempt to combat this period of economic decline, many of which were successful and appealed to the American people’s desires. President Roosevelt’s New Deal is often criticized for being excessively socialistic in nature, thus causing dramatic changes in the fundamental structure of the United

Read More
940 Words | 4 Pages

Although the roots of this movement date as far back as the 1900s, the legacy of the African American’s role in World War II sparked the catalyst needed to promote the legislation that eventually led to their equality. “On May 17, 1954, The Supreme Court announced its decision in the case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka” (Brinkley 772). This regulation overturned the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in the Plessy V Ferguson case. The separate but equal doctrine was a prime example of domestic policy that did not uphold the government’s constitutional promise to promote the general welfare of society-to include all that fall under the definition of an American citizen. The affliction put on children who had to travel to segregated public schools placed an unequal burden and damage done to those who it pertained to.

Read More
1918 Words | 8 Pages

As a result of the Brown vs. Board of Education decision, The United States legislators wrote the Southern Manifesto in 1956. They believed that the final result of Brown v. Board of Education, which stated that separate school facilities for black and white children were fundamentally unequal, was an abuse of the judicial power. The Southern Manifesto called for the exhaust of all the lawful things they can do in order to stop all the confusion that would come from school desegregation. The Manifesto also stated that the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution should limit the power of the Supreme Court when it comes to these types of issues. 2.

Read More
1556 Words | 7 Pages

INTRODUCTION “We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place.” -Chief Justice Earl Warren Separate But Equal, directed by George Stevens Jr, is an American made-for-television movie that is based on the landmark Brown v. Board of Directors case of the U.S. Supreme court which established that segregation of primary schools based on race, as dictated by the ‘Separate but Equal’ doctrine, was unconstitutional based on the reinterpretation of the 14th amendment and thus, put an end to state-sponsored segregation in the US. Aims and Objectives:

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Decades ago, children of various races could not go to school together in many locations of the United States. School districts could segregate students, legally, into different schools according to the color of their skin. The law said these separate schools had to be equal. Many schools for children that possessed color were of lesser quality than the schools for white students. To have separate schools for the black and white children became a basic rule in southern society.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

To overcome problems, one must look at it from a different angle. Intentions of the New Deal are good but do consist of flaws. Franklin Roosevelt passed this federal program to rebuild America from the devastating outcomes of the Great Depression. This crisis ignited a wildfire of economic instability and famine upon the United States. William E. Leuchtenburg, a professor of history, illustrates both the good and bad sides of Roosevelt’s program to battle this crisis.

Read More
1830 Words | 8 Pages

However, while this is true (African Americans were not helped, unemployment had risen after the federal government stopped subsidising jobs), FDR’s New Deal changed the role of the federal government in American society from a quite passive role to an active one. Through the Great Depression, Hoover had a laissez-faire approach. This meant that the government lets America figure out the dilemma themselves. One of the most important key turning point of the New Deal was the change in the relationship between the government and the nation.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Many people wonder what the New Deal really did for the American people. The New Deal was a series of national programs proposed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The New Deal programs happened during 1933-1938, right after the Great Depression. The New Deal had a very positive effect on the people of America by creating new jobs, gaining trust in banking systems, and getting freedom from the effects of the Great Depression.

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

Educating colored people wasn’t as important and in some states illegal. Many colored marched with pride for freedom over and over again. This was until May 17, 1954, when the famous case, “Brown v. Board of Education unanimously ruled “separate but equal” public schools for colored people and “white people” and that went against the constitution (Stallion, 2013). This case directly dealt directly with segregation between those of black color and those of white color. It allowed more students to study, work, and learn about each other together.

Read More

More about New Deal Argumentative Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document