Capital Punishment Is the highest form of retribution available in the United States. It is to kill a man who has committed horrible crimes. North Carolina alone as doled out this penalty to many people for the last century. “More than 1,000 persons have been sent to North Carolina's death row since the state assumed responsibility for executing criminals in 1910 (Death Penalty)”. These people have been tried and convicted of their crimes. They paid with their life for what they did. Most people who receive capital punishment do so by being found guilty of murder. In current times the death penalty is almost exclusively used for murders. Not everyone who if found guilty of murder receives the axe. It normally saved for the most heinous and …show more content…
First the two-step process needs to be reworked. That is the biggest cost factor and out dated. I would keep the guilty verdict and punishment separate but not years apart. The punishment hearing should be within a few months of a guilty conviction. This will lower the time and costs of an execution tremendously. Second all defense lawyers for the punishment hearing must be public defenders. This way wealth no longer has an impact on the murderer’s conviction. The lawyers would just need to be a small group of people who work together and give everyone fair treatment. During the punishment hearings, you will also decide on other possible retribution fit for the crime besides death. With the group working together they can keep a record of what they consider worthy of many years in prison, life in prison, and death. They will only look at the facts of the case without meeting the people. This will cut back on racial bias. They won’t be looking at the people so much as the acts that they did. My removing the human aspect and relations they can make a fairer judgment without prejudice. Having a set way will keep costs down and remove variables to better budget resources. Using this method will satisfy some parts of both groups of