Death penalty has existed for centuries, it is a method used to punish criminals or those who do not abide to social rules. By committing a capital crime or capital offence, you can be sentenced to death (which is also known as capital punishment). This method of punishment was very common in different countries, including the U.S. However, throughout the years this practice has decreased or has either been abolished by the government due to different interpretations of this system. In today’s society death penalty is still a very controversial issue where many individuals have different perspective about. Besides one of the most common arguments of the ethics of death penalty, is its competency on crime. Some individuals perceive death penalty as an ineffective method to halt crime, while others believe that the death penalty does influence the rate of …show more content…
Turner’s search uncovered that the homicide rate for “stranger murders” is much greater compared to “crime of passions”. So Turner questioned why should felonies and “strange murders” should be affected by capital punishment, when it is obvious that an action is necessary in order to decrease the rate of murders. Turner and many other criminologist believe that the solely reason for this explanation is that “it pays to kill your victim” (414). Turner gives brief examples of this statement, for instance when committing a robbery the culprit wishes that their victims will not be able to identify them, so they either try to be attentive on who is watching them or by eliminating their victims. Therefore, Turner and other supporters believe that since“societies made the mistake of utilizing death penalty by applying it to non-capital crimes” it influenced the abolishment of death penalty and since there was no act that would punish criminals, it influenced the rate of felonies to increase in the