Note On The Linsanity Essay

The “Note on the ‘Linsanity’ of measuring the relative efficiency of National Basketball Association guards” study by Boon L. Lee and Andrew C. Worthington, questions the judgment of assessing a point guards performance, as it is crucial to making decisions about “hiring, play positions, and salaries” (Lee & Worthington, 4194). The study also questions if it is important to validate whether the phenomenon known as “Linsanity” is justified. Through the use of statistical analysis the study concludes that Jeremy Lin is as efficient as the top third of point guards, but not so efficient that he is a “benchmark” (Lee & Worthington, Abstract). This measure of Jeremy Lins recent fame makes one wonder how precise it is. While the study provides a valuable beginning in assessing point guard performance, there are a

Caudill, Franklin G. Mixon Jr. and Scott Wallace investigates referee bias by looking at early and late game free throw shooting during most critical games of NBA seasons for fans, players and coaches. Although the NBA as a whole has not been publicly held accountable for turning a cheek on the unethical behaviors of referees, sports fans feel passionate about this issue. It concludes that referee bias on behalf of marquee NBA players exists during the end of NBA playoff contests. This research builds on previous studies of bias in the NBA. Price, Remer and Stone found “referee bias in the NBA that favors the home team, the trailing team during a particular game and the trailing team in a particular playoff series” (Caudill et al, 246). The authors further suggest that this bias benefits the NBA as a whole. “All three biases increase consumer demand and leak profits” (Caudill et al, 246). There is also reason to think that referee bias on behalf of marquee players increases league profits because everyone likes watching league players do