ipl-logo

Nuclear Energy By Bruno Comby Analysis

757 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Importance of alternative energy

BEST WAY, NUCLEAR

In 2008, Bruno Comby published an article, "The Benefits of Nuclear Energy" which was about energy resources, especially nuclear energy. He thinks that nuclear energy is the best energy resource from every point of view. Comby points out that the pollution that occurring due to fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) and contribution to greenhouse effect. He thinks that renewable energy resources should replace fossil fuels. Comby also says that there are 2 nuclear accidents in history, however there are hundreds of coal accident. I totally agree with the author, I think Comby has an appropriate point about pollution due to fossil fuels and nuclear's being clean. The other thing that i agree with the writer is nuclear energy and …show more content…

Actually only 2 accident in more than 60 years is a great statistic. Only Chernobyl has cost 32 life.(Comby, 2008, para. 12). Although, in modern mining, miner death per year is approximately 30 (Respiratory Protection in Coal Mines, 2012), people still afraid of nuclear more than the other energy resources. Nuclear energy is the most controlled and regardful energy resource. People afraid of nuclear, people afraid of radiation. However, radiation exists everywhere on planet. Just forget about planet, radiation is closer to people than they thought. "Most people are totally unaware of the fact that the human body itself is naturally radioactive" (Comby, 2008, para.18)
To sum up, I agree with the author on each viewpoints, the pollution due to fossil oils, wide spearing nuclear energy and renewable energy resources is necessary and there is a big bias on people about nuclear, because of unknown things about the nuclear. Nuclear energy is such a new source for mankind. It's hard to overcome the bias about it. Eventually when it happens, and nuclear is controlled well, world will reach "not only clean, but also safe, reliable, durable and competitive energy" (Comby, 2008, para.

Show More
Related
939 Words | 4 Pages

In “Nuclear Power is Not the Answer,” Helen Caldicott argues that pursuing nuclear energy would be a detriment to the United States. According to Caldicott, nuclear power, contrary to what the industry claims, is not clean and green, but rather a pollutant and a strong contributor to the destruction of the ozone layer. Because of the availability of uranium ore steadily decreasing, the process is requiring more and more fossil fuels to extract the ore. Caldicott projects that within ten to twenty years, nuclear reactors will be counterproductive because of the amount of fossil fuel it will take to mine the remaining uranium. In addition to air pollution, nuclear power plants also emit radioactive gases and materials that have the potential

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

In Richard A. Muller’s “Nuclear Waste”, he discusses the problem with left over nuclear waste and how it is causing headaches for scientists and politicians. The University of California at Berkeley professor agrees that nuclear waste does present a threat to our well being, but also states that society assumes there is a much larger danger than actually exists. Muller does a great job at proving his point by explaining how nuclear waste is not a forever lasting danger and by also providing alternative methods of storing the waste. Regardless of whether one supports the development of nukes, Muller mentions that this waste already exists and a solution must be made for it.

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Nuclear energy only creates minimal negative effects to the environment. Nuclear energy produces steam and low levels of carbon dioxide. Nuclear energy is also beneficial seeing that it produces a large amount of energy for a low cost. Nuclear reactors generate energy at a lower cost than oil, gas or coal. This nuclear energy will be a stable source of energy seeing that it is a base load source and it is synergistic with other renewable resources.

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

Facts, data, expert opinion: a) Low Pollution such as air pollution, water pollution - Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. It has been determined that the amount of greenhouse gases have decreased by almost half because of the prevalence in the utilization of nuclear power. Nuclear energy has the least effect on nature since it doesn’t discharge any gasses like methane and carbon dioxide b) Low Operating Costs - The cost of the uranium, which is utilized as a fuel in this process, is low. Also, even though the expense of setting up nuclear power plants is moderately high, the expense of running them is quite low. The normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being

Read More
305 Words | 2 Pages

Introduction Nuclear waste is produced at every stage of the nuclear fuel cycle, from uranium mining and enrichment, to reactor operation and the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. Much of this nuclear waste will remain hazardous for hundreds of thousands of years, leaving a poisonous legacy to future generations. The global volume of spent fuel was 220,000 tonnes in the year 2000, and is growing by approximately 10,000 tonnes annually. Despite billions of dollars of investment in various disposal options, the nuclear industry and governments have failed to come up with a feasible and sustainable solution.

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

At first, the Byzantine Empire is an allied nation of the West, although later it becomes an opponent. In both cases, the Byzantine Empire stands as a shield against Eastern expansion, first Persian and later Moslem. The Byzantine Empire is the name applied to what remained of the eastern Roman Empire after 450AD. It is centered around the eastern end of the Mediterranean, and located between the Nile Valley, the southern shore of the Black Sea, and inland as far as Mesopotamia. The principal city of the Byzantine Empire is the former eastern capital, Constantinople.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear power produces fewer carbon emissions than traditional energy sources because energy is not produced by burning molecules but splitting atoms. ‘An energy mix including nuclear power has the lowest impact on wildlife and Ecosystems’ as shown by a Conservation Biology paper. Consequently, greenhouse gas emissions have reduced by nearly half which shows the benefits and popularity of nuclear power use. Nuclear power has many environmental benefits such as small waste production, leaves no adverse effect on water, land or any habitats. By reducing fossil fuel consumption and switching to Nuclear Energy, we will sustain the environment, quality of air, improving the overall quality of

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

If the environment was exposed to even a relatively small nuclear weapon, studies show that devastating effects would take place against the world’s climate and decade long lasting effects on the ecosystems of the Earth. A small perception that can be used to see the effects of nuclear energy being exposed to the environment is the Chernobyl Disaster of 1986. To this day, there are still no inhabitants of the exposed areas inside Chernobyl, Ukraine, as those exposed can experience heavy vulnerabilities to cancer, diseases, and death. Just from the small accident in Chernobyl, there are still modern effects of the disaster. Things like birth defects, sights of mutated organisms, and sicknesses are still reported as a result from the mass leak of radiation.

Read More
1117 Words | 5 Pages

They are having second thoughts. In addition, the costly price of nuclear power plants and nuclear inflexibilty, meaning it has slow start up and shutdown hours. Finally, as I mentioned before, nuclear waste, a very hazardous

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the

Read More
1466 Words | 6 Pages

Probably words like radiation, mutations and Homer Simpson pop into your head. However, that is not the case. According to Mark A. Jones, Director of Nuclear Operations and Engineering at Hutchinson Island Nuclear Power Plant, during our interview stated: “Nuclear energy compared to solar energy brings less of an impact because nuclear energy doesn 't emit air pollution unlike other forms of energy. It also only needs the fraction of land the salon energy needs and self-contain its own waste from polluting the environment.”

Read More
1427 Words | 6 Pages

There is a quote by President Barack Obama saying, “To truly transform our economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy,” (“151 Inspiring Environmental Quotes”). He believes as many due that nonrenewable resources are harmful to all aspects of life. The energy we use now is harmful to our planet, to humans, and to animals. Scientists are taking steps to making the world a better place. They found sources that replenished naturally in a short amount of time and are less destructive in all aspects.

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

01 June 2015. Since some of them might offer a partial position on the topic, pro or against nuclear energy I will try to compare their data every time I am talking about a specific event or situation in order to provide data that are as objective as possible. Even though a thesis should be used to demonstrate a position it is politically correct to list the same data from different sources and not just by the one that is more similar to my position. 8. Main Objectives Nuclear energy has become an integral part our lives.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

The potential is limitless, and it should be realized as they have low greenhouse gas emissions, are efficient, powerful, cheap and reliable. Positives outweigh the negatives, and we should keep on using nuclear energy. Firstly, nuclear power generation has low greenhouse gas emissions, which make it good for the environment. The actual fission

Read More
1286 Words | 6 Pages

How Technology has changed the World I. Intro a. Over time humans have destroyed the environment with pollution and now we are creating new technologies to spot polluting our planet. b. Technology is rapidly evolving and it has changed the way people live out their lives. People have become attached to technology and it is affecting the way we live both physically and mentally.

Read More

More about Nuclear Energy By Bruno Comby Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document