ipl-logo

Nullification Dbq Essay

445 Words2 Pages

In the early 1830’s, South Carolina had the idea that they could nullify the law. This meant that the states could disregard some of the federal laws. A man named John C. Calhoun Promoted the idea. In 1828, there was a tariff passed that put a tax on all imports. Calhoun and a lot of Southern states were outraged. They thought this was one way to prevent succession. Some thought that state government outranked federal government, so they could decide which laws to follow, and which to ignore. Due to this conflict, there were two sides. Only the merchants of Charleston and the small farmers of the up country supported the Union side. Many of the people supported the nullification. The South thought that they were being treated unfairly. Senator …show more content…

Webster argued that from the beginning the Revolution had been a crusade of the united colonies rather than of each separately. True sovereignty, he stated, resided in the people as a whole for whom both state and federal governments acted as agents in the people's behalf. Haynes agreed with Calhoun and thought that states could nullify laws but Webster argued that it would lead to a civil war. Andrew Jackson, a slave owner and a southerner, was president while Calhoun was vice president. Jackson supported the Union and didn’t agree with the nullification. In the end, he said that anyone that supported it would be convicted of an act of treason. He didn’t think that it was necessary to act upon this and he said you would use the military he need be. But being the president, he needed to make both sides happy. In the end, the tariffs were lowered and the people accepted it. This event was a big thing in our countries history but do I think that it could've been prevented? I do think that if the Tariff wasn’t passed, then this specific event maybe could've been avoided. But the north and south never agreed. So who's to say that another problem could of erose? I believe that both sides had different forms of living and doing things, so for them to be in agreement with one another would be close to impossible. So I don’t think an event like this could've been

Show More
Related

Mcculloch Vs. Maryland 1819: Enumerated Powers Of The National Government

904 Words | 4 Pages

When congress was siding more with free states, Southern Leader, John C. Calhoun, created the “doctrine of nullification” which states that “a state has the constitutional right to nullify a national law” (73). This action almost lead to war when South Carolina invoked this doctrine and Andrew Jackson took military action to keep the union in tact. Although both sides were able to reach a compromise, a civil war will take place 30 years from then. Another spike in tensions was the Dred Scott decision (1857). A slave named Dred Scott argued that since his master died in a free state, and the Missouri Compromise of 1820, a federal law, made slavery in a free state illegal, he was a free man.

Read More

Why Did Jackson And Calhoun Contribute To The Civil War

849 Words | 4 Pages

Nullification was a controversial constitutional theory started by John C. Calhoun. He came up with the idea because he believed the tariff of 1816 was responsible for fall of South Carolinas economy. When in fact it was the exhausted farm land in the state which had caused the downfall. With his future political dreams resting on how he met this challenge in his home state he developed the theory of nullification. The theory stated that a state can suspend, within its boundaries, a federal law that was thought to be unconstitutional.

Read More

To What Extent Was The Northwest Ordinance Of 1787

995 Words | 4 Pages

We cannot say that this decision was bad or unfair for both camps either. 1830 was the year when a Protective Tariff was enacted that wanted to protect Northern products by making British products high in price. Once it was enacted, it became a number one sectional issue for the South. They had financial interest with Britain and threatened to leave the Union. This was resolved by gradually decreasing this Tariff every year until well into the 1840s, but it created a situation that had been remembered for years to come and might have contributed to the secession in 1861.

Read More

Apush Chapter 4 Key Terms

1081 Words | 5 Pages

Calhoun drafted south carolina exposition and protest responding to the tariff, saying Congress shouldn’t favor one state/ region over another. Calhoun using protest advancing states’ rights doctrine, saying since states had formed national government, that state power was greater than federal power. Believing state's right to nullify, or to reject any federal law that judging to be

Read More

Why John C. Calhoun Supported States Rights

171 Words | 1 Pages

JOHN CALHOUN: John C. Calhoun served as Adams vice president, Calhoun supported states rights. Calhoun to prevent the federal government from weakening states rights. John C. Calhoun was a very significant individual in the South and in our country. John C. Calhoun was a young war hawk that got elected to Congress. He favored going to war with Great Britain.

Read More

Analysis Of Apostles Of Disunion By Charles Dew

463 Words | 2 Pages

Dew states that this was not only about racism and different classes; which is known throughout the history educated world but it is about different ways of life. The southerners of this time did not want to lose their property which was not only their

Read More

Who Is Andrew Jackson Democratic Dbq

918 Words | 4 Pages

John C. Calhoun was Vice President under Andrew Jackson, and wrote this paper, although his name did not appear on it. He used Thomas Jefferson and James Madison Kentucky Resolves as a source. The Kentucky Resolves stated that states had the authority to determine whether the federal government had passed a bill into law that exceeded their power. If that were the case, individual states could declare said law null and void in their jurisdiction. John C. Calhoun used this document to explain South Carolina’s grievances with the tariffs.

Read More

Differences Between Virginia And Kentucky Resolutions

856 Words | 4 Pages

The resolution made it clear that it was wrong to allow the exercise of power by “Alien and Sedation Acts." In this case, the powers in these acts were not delegated to the federal government . It can be argued that the nullification proclamation was misguided. It declared that the people of South Carolina shall consider all acts developed by the Federal Government to abolish or shut its ports, or block free entry of vessels to the ports. This was inconsistent with the long-term continuance of the state with the union.

Read More

Differences Between North And South Dbq

868 Words | 4 Pages

In the early nineteenth century, American politicians chose to avoid the growing sectionalism between the industrial, free North and the agricultural, slave-driven South. They came up with all sorts of treaties and compromises to stall the rising conflict. Unfortunately, during the 1820s-1860s, Americans were no longer able to prevent conflict due to ideological differences between the North and South and the threat of secession in the South. Ever since the North started industrializing, the North and South have had divided ideological beliefs and cultures.

Read More

Northern And Southern Interpretation Of Constitution

1406 Words | 6 Pages

They had a more strict interpretation of the constitution. In other words, they believed that the only way the government could do something is if the Constitution explicitly allowed it. Each side argued how the Constitution proved their beliefs, however neither side got very far in the effort to resolve these issues, as it was many of these problems that ultimately led to the Civil War. Throughout the Antebellum Era, Northerners and Southerners greatly disagreed on many issues due to their respective viewpoints of the Constitution. The North tried to fight off the tariff and the national bank through their loose interpretation of the Constitution, while the South used their strict interpretation to say that both the tariff and national bank were constitutional.

Read More

Why Did The South Break The Primary Cause Of The Civil War Essay

828 Words | 4 Pages

The Union wanted to keep the country together, while the South wanted to become independent, just as they had from Britain. Due to legality

Read More

Civil War South Vs North

386 Words | 2 Pages

South vs North The south thought they could do what they wanted .Before the Civil War the South depended on slavery and the North was more of a Industrial. Then there were arguments about slavery should not be in the new states .People came up with compromises to fix all the fuss of which state is free and which state is a slave one.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1652 Words | 7 Pages

The reality was that because of regional differences that formed between them no true solution existed. The North wanted to limit the spread of slavery and perhaps one day eliminate it while the South refused to accept anything that threatened the expansion of slavery or the institution itself. When the Republican Party rose to power and elected Abraham Lincoln as their candidate, he knew that this issue would tear America apart as evidenced by his speech, “A House Divided Could Not Stand” and his inaugural address. Lincoln had said, “One section of our country believes slavery is right, and ought to be extended, while the other believes it is wrong, and ought not to be extended. This is the only substantial dispute.”

Read More

John C Calhoun Character Traits

1419 Words | 6 Pages

In this essay he claimed original sovereignty for the people acting through the states and advocated state veto or nullification of any national law that was held to impinge on minority interests. He later developed the argument in his two essays Disquisition on Government and Discourse on the Constitution, presenting the classic case for minority rights within the framework of majority rule. A moderate during the nullification crisis of 1832-1833, Calhoun joined with Henry Clay in working out the Compromise

Read More

Civil War Dbq Essay

880 Words | 4 Pages

This feeling of unhappiness stemmed from the government's perceived favoritism towards Northern states' interests. Document 2, Declaration of Causes of Seceding States, 1861: South Carolina, shows their letter of withdrawal from the federal union. "But in deference to the opinions and wishes of the other slaveholding states, she forbored at that time to exercise this right"(document 2). To better explain, it touches upon how many seceding states wanted to keep slavery. Another example of how South Carolina felt that their rights were not being protected is shown in document entitled Senator John C. Calhoun (D-SC) "Slavery a Positive Good".

Read More

More about Nullification Dbq Essay

Related Topics

Open Document